- Oct 30, 2010
- 5,547
- 4,365
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Solved Martin Bryant and Port Arthur
- Thread starter wally funk
- Start date
- Tagged users None
^brilliant
GreyCrow
TheBrownDog
- Mar 21, 2016
- 74,531
- 118,317
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, White Sox
You only had to watch his police interview to know Bryant did what was alleged. Why this wasn't made available 20 years ago baffles me
- Banned
- #179
Spot on. It's the elephant in the room that the CT'ers refuse to address.
He admitted it, when he thought he was off camera, because he thought he was so smart in so doing. But the CT'ers response is "let's ignore that, and focus on BUT EXPERT MARKSMAN!!!"
It's so ******* deluded.
- Oct 3, 2008
- 7,403
- 7,882
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
People that seriously think Martyn Bryant is innocent aren't normal.
- Dec 21, 2005
- 23,638
- 14,964
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
I did.
Quadzilla
Brownlow Medallist
- May 21, 2005
- 17,792
- 14,019
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Power, Magpies, Swamprats, Whales
I saw it ... it was when Bryant thought camera was off
- Dec 21, 2005
- 23,638
- 14,964
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
So when is it admitting if saying it was me isnt...?
- Banned
- #188
Exactly. You'll not find this addressed by the CT'ers though. It's all about BUT ESPERT MARKS MAN MATE!!!
- Oct 20, 2014
- 18,407
- 19,537
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
I wonder why?
- Banned
- #192
Do you?
Probably because we had been a federation for such a long time...
- Jun 14, 2015
- 17,773
- 38,765
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Power
Half the stuff posted by CT's isn't even "evidence".
Some Chinese copywriter cobbles together an article based on another newspaper's report and a twitter feed, gets a few facts wrong, misspells a word, and all of a sudden illuminati.
I love a good conspiracy theory but it's obvious as soon as ANYTHING happens in the world there's a large group of people with an internet connection looking for typos so they can be the first to publish their "analysis", which will end up being copy and pasted verbatim on forums like this.
The ironic thing being people will LITERALLY copy and paste another website yet call someone a "sheep" if they don't agree with 100% of it.
conspiracy theory and internet is awesome
- Oct 30, 2010
- 5,547
- 4,365
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Half the stuff posted by CT's isn't even "evidence".
Some Chinese copywriter cobbles together an article based on another newspaper's report and a twitter feed, gets a few facts wrong, misspells a word, and all of a sudden illuminati.
I love a good conspiracy theory but it's obvious as soon as ANYTHING happens in the world there's a large group of people with an internet connection looking for typos so they can be the first to publish their "analysis", which will end up being copy and pasted verbatim on forums like this.
The ironic thing being people will LITERALLY copy and paste another website yet call someone a "sheep" if they don't agree with 100% of it.
conspiracy theory and internet is awesome
i think i'm in love!
agree wholeheartedly, except for the part about them being awesome. honestly, i'm just too much of an intolerant prick. these faux intellectuals with their conceited arrogance s**t me to tears. which is why you won't be surprised i'm banned from that part of the BF forums
it's fine to question accepted narratives etc, but * off if you barely graduated high school and are lecturing/dismissing huge numbers of credentialed professionals because you saw some dumb-as-* youtube video. most of them are harmless of course (by virtue of being lazy campaigners who couldn't organise to change a bumper sticker) but some go on to hurt others. "fun" fact: i once mocked a CT tool on a skeptics forum, and about 18 months later IIRC, he and his girlfriend were involved in an attempted mass shooting. i think he killed a cop and maybe an employee/customer in a shopping center.
No he didn't: it was a set up
- Dec 21, 2005
- 23,638
- 14,964
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Yeah I heard about that one. Definite government involvement.
- Oct 30, 2010
- 5,547
- 4,365
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
haha! that's the sad hilariousness of it all. take the boston bombers. big alex jones fans from all reports. they go on to kill a bunch of people, in part due to their warped CT ideology => "false flag" are the cries from the cheap seats. i'm not sure if that's irony or justice or what.
_Mike_
Super Moderator
- Aug 10, 2009
- 33,275
- 32,085
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Tottenham, Montreal Canadiens
- Moderator
- #199
For now on the basis of the evidence presented, physical, eye witness accounts - it's safe to say that Bryant was the shooter found guilty. Until such time that there can be any evidence which beyond doubt states otherwise, there is nothing really to discuss on the matter of whether or not he did it.
- Banned
- #200
You're right. The question for this board is not "did he?" but "why did he?" and "how did he?", etc.
There's another very well thought out thread on the matter, for those who wish to discuss his guilt or innocence, on another very reputable part of bigfooty:
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/martin-bryant-and-port-arthur-conspiracy-or-cheddar.983512/
#duritzformod
