it's official, great news!!!
Bloody fantastic
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it's official, great news!!!
INFLAMMATORY COMMENT:
To be honest, OMAC's form this year as a genuine FB has been better than any form down back that TMAC has had over the journey purely as a defender*
*TMAC's intercept play is of course better, but OMAC's defense first play and his surety of disposal by foot makes him a better defender
Omac is also playing in a far better team than Tmac did for the majority of his time down back . I think you are selling Tmac very short there.
Without a doubt if his name was Lynch, Darling, Riewoldt ect ATM he would be worth 1M if he can average 3 goals a game for the year.In all honesty, that’s a massive bargain for the club. Especially when weighed up against the crazy money being thrown around for Lynch and McGovern
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Without a doubt if his name was Lynch, Darling, Riewoldt ect ATM he would be worth 1M if he can average 3 goals a game for the year.
This post will do me too...Well done Tommy, you did the right thing mate!!!
Can't wait to watch you win a B & F, cop a handful of AA jumpers and get them PREMIERSHIP medals!!!
I never doubted you MacDonald!! WHOOO HOOOO!!! GO DEES!!!
In the old days it was called making them earn it .Omac needs to develop his game for us to climb the table. He's a decent stopper but to be next level he needs to best his opponents not just stop them. At the moment he is more Astbury than Rance.
In the AFL pre the mid 2000s spoiling was a win, but now with forward pressure and the way sides want forward stoppages you need to mark on every opportunity.
As an aside I'm fine with the 2 50s he gave away, not sure wtf he is supposed to do. If he avoids contact the bloke plays on and Omac looks like an idiot.
Omac needs to develop his game for us to climb the table. He's a decent stopper but to be next level he needs to best his opponents not just stop them. At the moment he is more Astbury than Rance.
In the AFL pre the mid 2000s spoiling was a win, but now with forward pressure and the way sides want forward stoppages you need to mark on every opportunity.
As an aside I'm fine with the 2 50s he gave away, not sure wtf he is supposed to do. If he avoids contact the bloke plays on and Omac looks like an idiot.
Last night was game 50, if he was more Rance than Astbury at this point it would be incredible.Omac needs to develop his game for us to climb the table. He's a decent stopper but to be next level he needs to best his opponents not just stop them. At the moment he is more Astbury than Rance.
In the AFL pre the mid 2000s spoiling was a win, but now with forward pressure and the way sides want forward stoppages you need to mark on every opportunity.
As an aside I'm fine with the 2 50s he gave away, not sure wtf he is supposed to do. If he avoids contact the bloke plays on and Omac looks like an idiot.
Last night was game 50, if he was more Rance than Astbury at this point it would be incredible.
As for the 50's ... no real issue for me, the first one flat out wasn't a 50, minimal and unavoidable contact, and Marshal hadn't even taken the mark ... it should have been a free kick alone. The second was there, but there wasn't much he could do about it.
And If lever was out there, he would be the one being more rance than astbury.That's not true. Lever, Doedee, Sicily etc are more Rance than Sicily.
It wasn't a slight on Astbury. Astbury is the stopper but it's Rance that intercepts and does the damage.
They're different players ... Lever, Doedee and Sicily don't defend as well as OMacThat's not true. Lever, Doedee, Sicily etc are more Rance than Sicily.
It wasn't a slight on Astbury. Astbury is the stopper but it's Rance that intercepts and does the damage.
Last night was game 50, if he was more Rance than Astbury at this point it would be incredible.
As for the 50's ... no real issue for me, the first one flat out wasn't a 50, minimal and unavoidable contact, and Marshal hadn't even taken the mark ... it should have been a free kick alone. The second was there, but there wasn't much he could do about it.
They're different players ... Lever, Doedee and Sicily don't defend as well as OMac
Yeah I get that, I'm just saying that he's 50 games in, to expect him to be the complete defender is unrealistic and unfair ... the three players you mentioned aren't complete players eitherRight and what I'm saying is pure stopper defence can be exploited in the modern game. It hurts the opposition much more to mark it and rebound rather than just punch it out for a stoppage. That's what the forwards are trying to do these days.
Yeah I get that, I'm just saying that he's 50 games in, to expect him to be the complete defender is unrealistic and unfair ... the three players you mentioned aren't complete players either
Omac needs to develop his game for us to climb the table. He's a decent stopper but to be next level he needs to best his
opponents not just stop them.
In the AFL pre the mid 2000s spoiling was a win, but now with forward pressure and the way sides want forward stoppages you need to mark on every