Could care less about his tackling. $1000 for every goal + assist over 50 for the season. Minus 200 for every point, just to keep him honest.$1,000 per tackle
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could care less about his tackling. $1000 for every goal + assist over 50 for the season. Minus 200 for every point, just to keep him honest.$1,000 per tackle
That there would be a point of departure from the CS view and every other coach worth his salt.Could care less about his tackling. $1000 for every goal + assist over 50 for the season. Minus 200 for every point, just to keep him honest.
I know. One coach has success with it (Malthouse 2010), and every other coach copies. A few work it out - at a price. see the Bulldogs - and they all want to do it. There has to be a better way, and I also cannot wait until they put big limits on the interchange bench turnovers.That there would be a point of departure from the CS view and every other coach worth his salt.
Applying pressure on the ball carrier has been a fundamental coaching requirement almost since Adam was a boy. It's just that its importance has grown along with tackling techniques.I know. One coach has success with it (Malthouse 2010), and every other coach copies. A few work it out - at a price. see the Bulldogs - and they all want to do it. There has to be a better way, and I also cannot wait until they put big limits on the interchange bench turnovers.
Agree. But with the advent of continuous interchange turnovers over the past decade or so, coaches have upped that to the point where we have a 36 man glorified rugby scrum for large portions of games. Ball up after ball up.Applying pressure on the ball carrier has been a fundamental coaching requirement almost since Adam was a boy. It's just that its importance has grown along with tackling techniques.
The GFC dont need to do anything for him. They pay him to play footy. They have supported his recovery and, with an unbeforeseen level of work from himself, made it back ti play quality AFL footy.He is a young man of 26. The GFC need to also put a career path in front of him that is not dependent his knees breaking down on him.
Ah ok. Phrasing of the article I read made it seem like noone offered him a contract but makes more sense that he just didn't sign anything.
what should we do with all the spare salary cap space we look like having? we have clearly gone after ablett and another name and will end up most likely with none. that is going to be a spare 700-1million we have right there.Don’t think we will be upping the offer now Daz. He has tested the market and has no suitors for a better deal.
Credit to Geelong for getting the offer right and not overpaying.
what? he kicked 40 goals which is up on last year. we would of sacked sj and chapman at there peak with all this over the top emphasis on defensive pressure for forwards. both of them sucked at it. but it doesnt matter when the ball is going through the sticks.Personally I think Dan rested on his laurels this season & after everything he's been through I'm willing to let it slide assuming that no other club wanting him is the reminder he needed that getting back to being an AFL footballer was only the beginning.
Ablett is coming. The rest can be banked.what should we do with all the spare salary cap space we look like having? we have clearly gone after ablett and another name and will end up most likely with none. that is going to be a spare 700-1million we have right there.
Also skill is becoming less of a feature over grunt and commitment.Agree. But with the advent of continuous interchange turnovers over the past decade or so, coaches have upped that to the point where we have a 36 man glorified rugby scrum for large portions of games. Ball up after ball up.
And yet our best player against a fanatic Adelaide was Motlop. Maybe skilling the boys up will make a bigger difference than any new expensive imports.Also skill is becoming less of a feature over grunt and commitment.
Goodbye spectacle....especially in finals.
(Special shout out to umpires)
Kicks 40 but the opposition run off him these days and score eazy goals on the quick rebound,if we are to keep him which seem likely then the forward coaching group need to devise and set a plan with the personal in place to negate that.That's the challenge as I see it.what? he kicked 40 goals which is up on last year. we would of sacked sj and chapman at there peak with all this over the top emphasis on defensive pressure for forwards. both of them sucked at it. but it doesnt matter when the ball is going through the sticks.
Also skill is becoming less of a feature over grunt and commitment.
Goodbye spectacle....especially in finals.
(Special shout out to umpires)
lexicographers consider launguage as things people continue to say.
If I and 50,000 others decided to use "grarp" instead of hello they would recognise it as genuine and official language.
Doesn't mean it's correct or right though does it..
The fact people use that saying incorrectly (not as yiddish humour or sarcasm as I assume you are trying to make out) shows a complete lack of understanding and logic, "intensive purposes" is in the same mold.
No, not good for the game. Even if we won the premiership I wouldn't be thinking that.Not directed at you, but couldn't disagree more. We're just bitter because we were on the receiving end of two finals beltings, and a side we've enjoyed humiliating won the flag. If we'd won we'd be telling the world how awesome and incredible we are, and how it's good for the game.
what should we do with all the spare salary cap space we look like having? we have clearly gone after ablett and another name and will end up most likely with none. that is going to be a spare 700-1million we have right there.