Ok, so this thread has gone from bad to worse.
I could understand people trying to compare Nick with GAJ and a couple of other past champions and then the haters pick on the lack of contested marks, hit outs, or any other bottom feeding stat that can be found to attempt to bring him down.
Now people are trying to make an argument, that a player has had a better half a game, or a couple of quarters better than Nick
.
Please stop comparing Max Holmes to Nick because it is embarrassing.
At 22yo, Nick is a three-time AA and Premiership player and is widely considered the best player in the game.
Not only by those in the know but by his peers.
Max has had zero AA and the closest Max has had to a win on Grand Final day is in the sprint.
Nick accumulated the same amount of Brownlow votes in his final 5 games last year, as what Homes has had in his career.
Max Holmes is a decent enough player but I'm sorry, he isn't even in the same discussion as Nick Daicos and all the BS farfetched stats won't change that.
Seriously "Max Holmes was the best player on the ground at the 20 minute mark"
Give it a rest.
Mr Meow, I have had your back in some of the discussions you have had with a few of our Richmond loving nuffies over the years but in this instance, you are scraping the bottom of the barrel and looking desperate.
At least with GAJ, there was something to compare.
Also, on a side note. In that final against Adelaide, although Moore was BOG, anyone with a set of eyes could see as far as skill goes, Nick was on a different level to any player on the ground.
How about we all just let the kid play and cut it with all this bullshit back and forth.
I could understand people trying to compare Nick with GAJ and a couple of other past champions and then the haters pick on the lack of contested marks, hit outs, or any other bottom feeding stat that can be found to attempt to bring him down.
Now people are trying to make an argument, that a player has had a better half a game, or a couple of quarters better than Nick
Please stop comparing Max Holmes to Nick because it is embarrassing.
At 22yo, Nick is a three-time AA and Premiership player and is widely considered the best player in the game.
Not only by those in the know but by his peers.
Max has had zero AA and the closest Max has had to a win on Grand Final day is in the sprint.
Nick accumulated the same amount of Brownlow votes in his final 5 games last year, as what Homes has had in his career.
Max Holmes is a decent enough player but I'm sorry, he isn't even in the same discussion as Nick Daicos and all the BS farfetched stats won't change that.
Seriously "Max Holmes was the best player on the ground at the 20 minute mark"
Mr Meow, I have had your back in some of the discussions you have had with a few of our Richmond loving nuffies over the years but in this instance, you are scraping the bottom of the barrel and looking desperate.
At least with GAJ, there was something to compare.
Also, on a side note. In that final against Adelaide, although Moore was BOG, anyone with a set of eyes could see as far as skill goes, Nick was on a different level to any player on the ground.
How about we all just let the kid play and cut it with all this bullshit back and forth.





