Macclure is entering Newman dinosaur territory these days-younger ex players needed and she is perfect fit. Plenty of merit in her appointment-her analysis of the game is good. I heard Maclure's analysis of why the crows would win the flag-it was because Richmond were getting bigheads and that gave him the irates. He was having a joke but quite a bit of his commentary is pretty shallow lately. Silly thread.So in summary of the last 7 pages.
1. If I had a stab at a Maclure and Wallace in OP as well It would have been considered PC (apparently, i'm not buying it though) AND (I did say down the bottom of the OP "not the best panel" referring to the whole panel, just because I chose to hone in on 1 of those members means nothing.
2. PC patrol with their pitchforks and torches are in good numbers
3. People just waiting to be offended, it's almost like you all want to be offended.
4. People love reading between the lines, some bloke even had the guts to spill that I was inferring she was having sex with someone (what a load of nonsense). The original content of the OP warped into "her having sex with someone" without me even posting anything of content again. Thats unreal.
The point is, She didn't have the required merit to vote on the Norm Smith, not because she's a woman, but because she's not f****** qualified.
Yes Wallace and Maclure have more merit being on the voting panel ahead of her and anyone saying otherwise IS ANTI-MALE! HOW DARE THEY, SO SEXIST.
See how ******ed that argument is? Wallace and Maclure although both media peanuts both had long successful AFL careers and have the necessary merit to be on that panel.