We do play bad football in the wet Dan, because the players do not adjust their game to the conditions. They handpass too much and try to put pinpoint passes onto the chests of our leading forwards. They did it on ANZAC day '02, they did it against Melbourne last year (even though we scraped in with the win i was nowhere near as impressed with that effort as you were) and they did it against Port in the final. Did you notice that in the 1st qtr of the Port final that the Power kicked 3 goals off the ground? THAT'S what you do in wet weather footy. No stuffing around, just take whatever opportunity you get to move the ball forward. Our boys don't seem to realise that.Originally posted by Dan26
I don't think we play badly in the wet, as a rule. I just think, by coincidence, that a few of our poorer games in recent years have been in the wet. It's only really that one Anzac day game in 2002 that people refer to anyway, when regrading our wet weather play. We had a pretty gutsy win in the wet late last year over Melbourne at the 'G, that was an underrated performance.
A club trains outdoors all during the summer, and all during the season. It's only 2 hours of football 9 times a year at the Dome that we are indoors (18 hours) and I fail to see how 18 hours of football, compared to hundreds of hours of outdoor training is somehow going to make us worse in the wet.
I think it's a bit of a myth. I think we're as capable of playing in thr wet as any other team. Collingwood nearly play as many matches at the Dome as us. We play 9 and I think they play 7. Why should we be worse in the wet than them? Under what logic?





