- May 18, 2016
- 13,030
- 24,903
- AFL Club
- Geelong
It’s inevitable. But he has speed to burn so it won’t be an issue like it was for jimmy.Well he will, he's not going to keep his speed. Like it or not he will slow down with age.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s inevitable. But he has speed to burn so it won’t be an issue like it was for jimmy.Well he will, he's not going to keep his speed. Like it or not he will slow down with age.
Jimmy was a better user of the ball, though. Speed wasn't a major asset like it is for Dangerfield. Becomes a far more limited player when he slows down because that takes a lot of his game away.Probably not. Just pointing out jimmy was so slow as he got older and it finished him. Danger won’t have that issue of losing a step making him slow.
Have ever seen another player hunt the ball better than Dangerfield though?Jimmy was a better user of the ball, though. Speed wasn't a major asset like it is for Dangerfield. Becomes a far more limited player when he slows down because that takes a lot of his game away.
Becomes harder for him to hunt the ball like that if he loses that bust speed, however. That's why I say it would take a lot of his game away.Have ever seen another player hunt the ball better than Dangerfield though?
His ability to play inside and outside is as good as I've ever seen and the only blight on his game is his kicking and that's because IMO he rushes his ball drop.
I think his spread from the contest will deminish over time, but his ability to win the contested ball is pure animalistic attitude.Becomes harder for him to hunt the ball like that if he loses that bust speed, however. That's why I say it would take a lot of his game away.
So he will be 34 by the time his contract ends.
Boys club.
It's always difficult to work out until you see the clauses in the contract. Dangers last two seasons could have game requirements or triggers similar to bartel.
Anyway though Danger took a considerable cut in money to come to Geelong. When in the premiership heyday that was a staple of geelong players taking unders and getting fixed up on the back end. Didn't happen for all but danger deserves his whack for sure. I think he could of got an extra 600k if he really wanted it in Melbourne and still live in moggs creek
Well probably not because like the others he would have to come 'home' eg to the GFC. Even St Kilda is not close enough apparently.It's always difficult to work out until you see the clauses in the contract. Dangers last two seasons could have game requirements or triggers similar to bartel.
Anyway though Danger took a considerable cut in money to come to Geelong. When in the premiership heyday that was a staple of geelong players taking unders and getting fixed up on the back end. Didn't happen for all but danger deserves his whack for sure. I think he could of got an extra 600k if he really wanted it in Melbourne and still live in moggs creek
Well probably not because like the others he would have to come 'home' eg to the GFC. Even St Kilda is not close enough apparently.
WE had space to offer Kelly a big whack... so its plausible that they have loaded that into a Danger contract and allow room down the track for another addition. So front more than rear load ...