Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is that actually a serious question? You're actually asking if a home elimination final is better than a potential home prelim after a week off or at worse a home semi final.Srs question which is better - that we make the top 4 and get a second chance should we lose - or to finish 5th or 6th which means we get a home final in the 1st week of the finals and hope like mad we win. Also should we be lucky enough to make the top 4 and we lose that first game, would we get a home final the 2nd week of the finals as would be playing the winner of one of the teams placed 5th to 8th.
TBH i thought that was barrass' fault not mastens.
Kicked to a stationary Barrass. I'd say the kicker is generally to blame.
Playing devils advocate, its usually a good idea to come towards the kicker
That's what I was trying to ascertain - was not sure we would get a home final in the event we make the top 4 (unlikely now) and lost the 1st week of the finals. That is all. As in my opinion getting a home final is the key to going any further (but no guarantee of course). Anyway after the weekend results can't see that we will have a hope in hell of making the top 4 now. Richmond didn't do us any favours, however we only have ourselves to blame. The losses against Adelaide at home and the Pies away will come home to roost as the saying goes.Is that actually a serious question? You're actually asking if a home elimination final is better than a potential home prelim after a week off or at worse a home semi final.
Flat trajectory kicks you always go to meet the ball.I think 20m kicks to a stationary, flat footed player with an opposition player in the vicinity is pretty unforgiveable.
Masten had to be the player adjudging how close the opposition player was and whether he can make the distance in time.
Barrass cannot know the proximity of players directly behind him.
Yeah this. Gov has been doing that once a game recently and considering the standard we hold him to its giving me the irrits.- Gov's kicking. The the second best kick above 40m but he gets way too lazy at times. As defender the last thing you want is to have a lazy kick turned over and i think because of his lazy kicks coming out of defence, the opposition have a kicked a handful of goals. Hurns kicking last night was on fire and if those two could really set us alight against the hawks.
It's his job to take marks and kick goals, and he's only just started to be competent at that. Nic is a top 3 ruck in the comp, and he still kicked more goals than Watts. Probably the right call? Definitely the right call.Can anyone else picture David Swartz saying that Nic Nat is really just a highlight real and doesn't get enough possessions to influence matches? I mean Jack Watts had nearly as many possessions and only one less goal and Watts took heaps more marks. Probably still the right call to take Watts over Naitainui if you think about it.
He was just around the area at the time.why was masten even given the ball?
I'm so glad I benched him in favour of Touk MillerOnly negative from the game is thanks to Lycetts Supercoach score of two I lost my final...
Kicked to a stationary Barrass. I'd say the kicker is generally to blame.
There are GWS fans to actually harp on about it? Could have fooled me.Can't believe that GWS fans are going on about the umpiring.
Even in the dying minutes Lachie Whitfield got spun, touched the ball on the ground and then the umpire called ball up.
Then a moment later he was spoiling LeCras and chopping the arm, play on.
Thought we were hard done by more than them.