Will also be interesting if Kolo does a fantastic job, we win well and he stays in the team too.
Lots of interesting possibilities for sure.
On the balance of probabilities that’s the least likely outcome.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Will also be interesting if Kolo does a fantastic job, we win well and he stays in the team too.
Lots of interesting possibilities for sure.
JK the defender is an asset - he's really solid in terms of his defensive jobs and gets beaten a lot less than some would give him credit forLook im not sure why all the hate on kolo... look I understand his disposal of the ball when under pressure can be shocking... but as a defender he does a good job... especially if he went down and the have Joe and Hipworth, were getting a little stretch for height..
We can still match up good with Collingwood without him.
Id be very concerned if we play Sydney... Reid, Buddy, McDonald that in Sydney is very concerning in defence is not good if Kolo isn't playing...
I know that's next week, that if we get over Brisbane first
On the balance of probabilities that’s the least likely outcome.
Wouldn't that make it more interesting then?On the balance of probabilities that’s the least likely outcome.
Well make it happen then !!!!- get out the Rosary beads or whatever - but make it happenI’m sensing a massive Dangerfield game.
Wouldn't that make it more interesting then?
Or are you just living out worst case scenario possibilities so that you can already feel correct about your assertions?
Parfitt in for Kolo to take on Hipwood, McStay or Daniher seemed most logical to me. WTF is the MC thinking?
I think they are going with what has worked this year. They are backing the players and the system in to get it done.You think that’s the logic? You’re missing the point if that’s the case.
Okay so in the hypothetical, bring Parfitt in. Keep in mind Blicavs has been a permanent midfielder all season besides a couple of times Stewart wasn't available.You think that’s the logic? You’re missing the point if that’s the case.
How does it drain so well
I just feel like he gunna make a statement. He obviously not happy starting on the bench, it just feels like it’s set up for a huge Dangerfield special.Well make it happen then !!!!- get out the Rosary beads or whatever - but make it happen
Im yet to see him really play a blinder in a final but id take 2 in the next 2 weeks, pity he will start on the bench more than likely tomorrow night, would be good to see him go crash bash into the first contest and set the tone.I’m sensing a massive Dangerfield game.
Okay so in the hypothetical, bring Parfitt in. Keep in mind Blicavs has been a permanent midfielder all season besides a couple of times Stewart wasn't available.
Who takes Daniher, Hipwood and McStay?
Midfield rotations are currently Blicavs, Atkins, Danger, Selwood, Guthrie and at times Holmes or Duncan. 7 guys for 3 rotations. How many defenders do we have to take their three key forwards if Kolo isn't in?
I think they are going with what has worked this year. They are backing the players and the system in to get it done.
Whether we win or not I don’t know.
However it looks like they are putting belief in what has worked for them instead of making panicked changes.
Don’t think we’ll lose this week regardless but it concerns me that in a further week we should be playing Parfitt against either the Swans or Pies and he hasn’t had a game in a month.
If that's the structure they wanted to go with, don't you think they'd have tried it out during the season when Kolo was available?For a start it’s likely to be wet. Secondly we’ve got De Koning, Stewart and Henry who play a team defense game. Every contest isn’t one on one! Based on your logic, if Bris picked 6 tall forwards, we’d have to pick 6 tall defenders. It’s a nonsense. If anything by having one less tall gives us more run out of def 50.
Duncan has been playing at half back rather than as a mid. So that’s one less from your rotations.
For what it’s worth, I’d be comfortable if O’Connor was named - he provides far more flexibility than Kolo if you are looking for a player to be able to play multiple roles.
JK the defender is an asset - he's really solid in terms of his defensive jobs and gets beaten a lot less than some would give him credit for
The bigger concern is JK with ball in hand, especially in open play deep in the opposition's forward line - that's when one almost covers their eyes and peeps out between their fingers to see what eventuates
I honestly thought the day before last match that Gary Rohan would have a blinder. Today, Dangerfield's name came to mind. Say as you will, but let's see. I think he just has to make at statement, and you'd suspect Berry would take time on him, whenever on ball.I’m sensing a massive Dangerfield game.
I just feel like he gunna make a statement. He obviously not happy starting on the bench, it just feels like it’s set up for a huge Dangerfield special.
For a start it’s likely to be wet. Secondly we’ve got De Koning, Stewart and Henry who play a team defense game. Every contest isn’t one on one! Based on your logic, if Bris picked 6 tall forwards, we’d have to pick 6 tall defenders. It’s a nonsense. If anything by having one less tall gives us more run out of def 50.
Duncan has been playing at half back rather than as a mid. So that’s one less from your rotations.
For what it’s worth, I’d be comfortable if O’Connor was named - he provides far more flexibility than Kolo if you are looking for a player to be able to play multiple roles.