Once, for one game, after a really bad game. Safe to say that he didn't meet the coaches' expectations for that game. Not safe to extrapolate that over the rest of the season.Except he was dropped.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Once, for one game, after a really bad game. Safe to say that he didn't meet the coaches' expectations for that game. Not safe to extrapolate that over the rest of the season.Except he was dropped.
Once, for one game, after a really bad game. Safe to say that he didn't meet the coaches' expectations for that game. Not safe to extrapolate that over the rest of the season.
How am I supposed to knowThe truth is that basically every measure we have states that he shouldn't be in the side, and his contribution when he is, isn't rated.
That's the truth, the fact that he's selected regardless, is what leads to conspiracy theories.
So you would carry passengers?I'd take an 80% Knight, Menzel or Hampton over Mackay come finals.
His second best season?To put this into context, he started 2015 really well and his votes reflected that. His form then evaporated completely, and once again, his votes reflected that too. Eventually, he was dropped, as you'd expect. What I still don't understand is why he was brought back for the finals, but this isn't the time or place for that discussion. That was 2015.
What we don't know is how he's polling in the club B&F voting this year. We know his performances have been much, much better than they were in 2015. Last year he averaged a pitiful 13.8 disposals per game. This year, he's increased that by roughly 50% to 19.8. Statistically, this is his 2nd best season (2009 being his PB). There is no reason to think that the coaches are unhappy with him this year, the way they were last year.
Your argument states that he "isn't" playing his role and doing his part. You don't know that. You can't know that, unless you've spoken to the coaches or seen their votes for 2016. I'm assuming that neither of these is true, so your argument has no basis.
Except that his form in the preceding games wasn't bad at all - he played OK against Carlton, Melbourne and North Melbourne.When have we dropped an established player for a single bad game? Douglas has played 2 or 3 stinkers, we didn't drop him.
It's a very reasonable assumption that he was finally dropped due to a run of sub-standard performances, culminating in the shocker against Collingwood.
Crap really. NikkiNoo ranging it.I am more arguing for the selection policy and not the selection of Mackay. I would ( like to think ) argue the same if another player was getting continually selected
People DO say this though - they'll say that all teams have weak links or that the Crows had some duds in 97 and 98.
As though it's desirable to have some weak links and duds.
The irony!So you would carry passengers?
Yep, and remember, people have considered this a good year for Mackay.
Take in how low that bar is.
Except that his form in the preceding games wasn't bad at all - he played OK against Carlton, Melbourne and North Melbourne.
He's close to the last man picked right now. No argument there. The week we played Geelong he dropped out of the bottom of the 22. He came back the following week, when we had 2 players drop out with injury.
His second best season?
Mackay has been dropped this year and has less coaches votes than nearly every player that has suited up.
They can't be that happy with him - I guess expectations are very low
Never said this. If people think coaches select a player , in a game as important as a GF , just to troll BigFooty then it shows how stupid some posters are. Mackay for all his faults must have something the coaches like over another player. When they stop liking what he has he will be dropped.
Mackay was woeful against Carlton. Don't you remember the turnover goal, the soft push over in the goalsquare and the ball knocking him over?Except that his form in the preceding games wasn't bad at all - he played OK against Carlton, Melbourne and North Melbourne.
He's close to the last man picked right now. No argument there. The week we played Geelong he dropped out of the bottom of the 22. He came back the following week, when we had 2 players drop out with injury.
I'd bring Jaensch backI'd take an 80% Knight, Menzel or Hampton over Mackay come finals.
It's laughable that the Mackay supporters can't even admit he would not have been dropped after one game. It's unheard of that we would do that to a senior player.Mackay was woeful against Carlton. Don't you remember the turnover goal, the soft push over in the goalsquare and the ball knocking him over?
The first implies the second.They do say the 1st part.
They do not imply the 2nd at all.
I'd bring in a 40yo McLeod before DMac, I'd say he'd still perform better barely trained due to his knees anyway, still keeps fit regardless.I'd bring Jaensch back
Don't focus on the voting. Focus on why he continues to get selected DESPITE this lack of voting
You keep getting your tenses confused. This is 2016. You need to move on from 2015.
Dropped 2 years in a row, 3 out of 4. To be dropped those 3 times he just didn't just play 3 bad games. It was a build up of poor form. Actually it's worse than that, his occasional on games have saved his bacon on more than one occasion.Don't focus on the voting. Focus on why he continues to get selected DESPITE this lack of voting