Remove this Banner Ad

No Oppo Supporters Re-signing Tex, Danger and Sloane *** Crows Only ***

  • Thread starter Thread starter Allefgib
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Your thoughts on Dangerfield?


  • Total voters
    684

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Player agents do make sure that the clubs play ball if their high profile client wants a trade.

If danger chooses the cats, Connors will keep the cats honest that they offer Afc something reasonable. Sure it will be unders, but won't be a complete rip off like the rfa compensation pick.

We will get ripped off. Conners won't care.
 
tippett - nothing in return/sanctions
gunston - late second rounder
davis - nothing
bock - nothing

no club has ever been bent over and lost as many players as us, yet victorian media make it out as if we should bend over once again to geelong because the player wants to leave. we would pretty much be hawthorn had those players not left. the arrogance of geelong is disgusting
We got compensation picks for both bock & Davis. Bock we wasted on tambling. Davis we spent wiser as part of the b crouch & Brown deal.
 
Do you seriously believe that????
A player agent is not going to agree to trade a high profile player to a club who does not take the trading seriously.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

We already have said we will. ;)

Why do you think these Vic media types like Jay are now running with their poor Geelong agenda where afc should just do the right thing & handover danger for free...

Sells newspapers. SA v VIC. We've got a 'Vic boy' and we are the evil interstate team who will try and stop 'their boy' from coming home.
 
A player agent is not going to agree to trade a high profile player to a club who does not take the trading seriously.

Absolute ****ing bollocks. If Danger says he wants to go to club x, his one and only concern is to get his client to club x. That's it. He won't give a flying **** if we only get a bag of lollies for Danger. We don't pay his wages, Danger does.
 
We will get ripped off. Conners won't care.
Connors cares that his client gets what he wants which means ensuring the trade is reasonsable for all parties.
 
We got compensation picks for both bock & Davis. Bock we wasted on tambling. Davis we spent wiser as part of the b crouch & Brown deal.
ok but with dangerfield we will get absolutely bent over in the biggest possible way. henderson will sign first and their first rounder will be gone. motlop will not want to leave if both henderson and dangerfield come. they have no one else on their list gettable that we would want. how could they accomodate us fairly in a trade? they cant. he will go to PSD and f*ck us over once again with the backing of all the victorian media to make it seem like a fair deal
 
Absolute ******* bollocks. If Danger says he wants to go to club x, his one and only concern is to get his client to club x. That's it. He won't give a flying **** if we only get a bag of lollies for Danger. We don't pay his wages, Danger does.
So you reckon danger & Connors would prefer he end up at a bottom side via the psd?

You have much to learn!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

tippett - nothing in return/sanctions
gunston - late second rounder
davis - nothing
bock - nothing

Gunston + 53 (Woodward) + 71 (Sutcliffe) for 24 + 46 (Joyce) + 64 (Ellis-Yolmen)
24 went to 27 (Kerridge) + 31 (Jenkins) + 41 (Grigg) + 68 (part of the trade for Johnston)

So we traded out Gunston and some late picks for Kerridge, Jenkins, Ellis-Yolmen and Grigg

Davis + 10 for Brad Crouch and Luke Brown

Bock for Tambling
 
ok but with dangerfield we will get absolutely bent over in the biggest possible way. henderson will sign first and their first rounder will be gone. motlop will not want to leave if both henderson and dangerfield come. they have no one else on their list gettable that we would want. how could they accomodate us fairly in a trade? they cant. he will go to PSD and f*ck us over once again with the backing of all the victorian media to make it seem like a fair deal
I will disappear for all pre-season if danger goes into the psd.

Will not happen!
 
Connors cares that his client gets what he wants which means ensuring the trade is reasonsable for all parties.

You're way off on this one. The first part of your sentence is right but then next is fairy land. You're saying that Connors would say to Danger, nah sorry mate Geelong want you but are only offering their first and a spud and that's not a fair trade. Adelaide said yes because they've been threatened with the PSD and have no choice to accept. I don't agree to the trade. We can do the trade and get you home as you asked me to do, but it's not a fair trade so sorry not willing to approve it.

Mate seriously. Just no.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You're way off on this one. The first part of your sentence is right but then next is fairy land. You're saying that Connors would say to Danger, nah sorry mate Geelong want you but are only offering their first and a spud and that's not a fair trade. Adelaide said yes because they've been threatened with the PSD and have no choice to accept. I don't agree to the trade. We can do the trade and get you home as you asked me to do, but it's not a fair trade so sorry not willing to approve it.

Mate seriously. Just no.
No, what I have been saying is that if Dangerfield agrees to go to Geelong, Connors will ensure that the cats offer up decent value, which will still be unders but more than fa compensation. He will not allow the cats to trade out their 1st rounder for another deal as it will jeopardise his client.
 
You're way off on this one. The first part of your sentence is right but then next is fairy land. You're saying that Connors would say to Danger, nah sorry mate Geelong want you but are only offering their first and a spud and that's not a fair trade. Adelaide said yes because they've been threatened with the PSD and have no choice to accept. I don't agree to the trade. We can do the trade and get you home as you asked me to do, but it's not a fair trade so sorry not willing to approve it.

Mate seriously. Just no.
His argument was not as you've framed it but effectively this.. If not reasonable, Crows dont sign-off, so his client doesn't get what he wants.

Also, consider this - player managers are paid a % of player's wages. Incentive to convince client to go to the highest bidder... Might not be Geelong.
 
Lets not forget - double digits and dud player is no acceptable as a trade. This is what Geelong will offer and Conners will push for.
I agree.

1st rounder & decent player like a motlop is the value.
 
No, what I have been saying is that if Dangerfield agrees to go to Geelong, Connors will ensure that the cats offer up decent value, which will still be unders but more than fa compensation. He will not allow the cats to trade out their 1st rounder for another deal as it will jeopardise his client.

Who cares.

We should not be greatful to receive anything better than the AFL compensation. That is a crap attitude.

We have to stick to our guns and not budge until we get fair compensation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom