Play Nice Scott Morrison - How Long? Part 6 - Prosperity Theology, The Coal Man + His Bootlickers

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
A Liberal party donor.
Corruption is essentially hidden.. therefore it is hard to know who benefits from the corruption as it is HIDDEN. That is the reason we need to get rid of corruption.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Corruption is essentially hidden.. therefore it is hard to know who benefits from the corruption as it is HIDDEN. That is the reason we need to get rid of corruption.

Proof is what sorts out those calling wolf, who get exposed as avid enthusiasts & dont do anything to attract the swinging vote that delivers Government.

A couple of examples of corruption were gaoled last week.
 
Only those who dont like the conclusions. One nutter thought reality disenfranchised them, go figure.
... we don't like the conclusions because it demonstrates a corrupt system. You, who are supposedly balanced, 'up the guts', continuously seem to find yourself defending the government's corruption or deflecting to a 'both sides' argument.

Have you never wondered why your arguments don't seem to track all that well?
 
So it made no difference to the regular claims that far surpass the oft claimed offence. Boys calling wolf get ignored.
You asked a question, when the answer was in the tweet concerned.

Then you reply with this.

You have to be trolling. Or are you being paid to post this stuff?
 
Even the LNP simps have backed off, they know it's rotten but they wouldn't dare speak out about it

Gutless

Are you the full quid, so smart that anyone with a different view is frightened, hell there is a thread for those afraid of a 90 year old. Is it catching or limited to the other mob, simps, well hello sailor.

People are rotten across the board. Is it just one side of politics that are afraid to speak out .... the other mob.
 
... we don't like the conclusions because it demonstrates a corrupt system. You, who are supposedly balanced, 'up the guts', continuously seem to find yourself defending the government's corruption or deflecting to a 'both sides' argument.

Have you never wondered why your arguments don't seem to track all that well?

I'm well aware many people see politics as they do their footy team.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'm well aware many people see politics as they do their footy team.
That's not wonder, that's deciding on a reason without inquiry.

You're not interested in changing their minds or even listening to why they think the way they do. You're precisely as insulated from other opinion as you think others are.
 
Proof is what sorts out those calling wolf, who get exposed as avid enthusiasts & dont do anything to attract the swinging vote that delivers Government.

A couple of examples of corruption were gaoled last week.
So why not subject Porter's donation to parliamentary process and scrutiny?
 
So why not subject Porter's donation to parliamentary process and scrutiny?

If it is the law to do so, I have no objection.
Whomever made the donation is entitled to expect the law of the day applies to that donation.
See the treatment of elected officials who dare to have an opinion the loud mouth boors get, even their kids ... gutless wonders.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top