He'd be pretty gutted id imagine, more so if we miss finalsDidn't get to watch today's game because of work but I wonder how Tom feels about the decision to move his family here to play finals football?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He'd be pretty gutted id imagine, more so if we miss finalsDidn't get to watch today's game because of work but I wonder how Tom feels about the decision to move his family here to play finals football?
Ebert should have tried standing upright.Ebert should have tagged Mitchell. Let Rockliff go for the ball.
Ebert should have turned up. In as much of a rut as Wingard.Ebert should have tried standing upright.
Stopped Mitchell in the second half, was actually not that bad today. The other leaders (Ollie, Boak, Ebert, Dixon, Wingard) are more to blame the Rocky
He moved for a bigger/longer contract btw, to think otherwise is silly
Well him and his mates need to lift then.. cry me a riverHe'd be pretty gutted id imagine, more so if we miss finals
Carlton offers BAZILLION-dollar contracts every off-season, but no one goes there...Thanks for that. It he's only here for the money then I'm sure he's having the time of his life.
To suggest players don't consider where a team is at when then sign a contract is either very cynical or very silly
Reasonable first half as a hunter and gatherer.Ebert should have tagged Mitchell. Let Rockliff go for the ball.
You're thinking of North Melbourne.Carlton offers BAZILLION-dollar contracts every off-season, but no one goes there...
How many free kicks did Mitchell end up with?Did a great job on Mitchell even though looking at him incurred a free kick. Genuinely professional footballer.
I have given only one example. North is another...You're thinking of North Melbourne.
How many free kicks did Mitchell end up with?
There’s a surprise, most frees for, none against.... gotta look after Clarkos number one midfielder5 frees for, more than any
player on the ground. 0 against.
5 frees for, more than any player on the ground. 0 against.
Must have been Mitchell he was showing to Gill on his laptop. The campaignerThere’s a surprise, most frees for, none against.... gotta look after Clarkos number one midfielder
Did a great job on Mitchell even though looking at him incurred a free kick. Genuinely professional footballer.
Do you reckon? I thought we bought Rockliff as a clearance specialist not a tagger. Mitchell had 28 possessions and Rockliff 10, I do not see that as a great job. Rockliff was apparently happy with his effort and you were happy so I guess I must be misreading Rockliff. I remember the days when Kornes and Carr would tag the opposition and pick up 20 possessions themselves. Rockliff lead the AFL in clearances a few years back and that was what i though we were getting.
And ended up coping a $1000 fine .. did his job too well ..Mitchell had 21 possessions to half time with SPP on him most of that time and was cutting us to pieces. Rockliff held him to 7 after half time. You can argue the point whether another player should have gone to Mitchell, but Rockliff did the job he was asked to do.
And ended up coping a $1000 fine .. did his job too well ..
Mitchell had 21 possessions to half time with SPP on him most of that time and was cutting us to pieces. Rockliff held him to 7 after half time. You can argue the point whether another player should have gone to Mitchell, but Rockliff did the job he was asked to do.
Rockys move to Mitchell was a great one. Rocky was quiet in the first half and Mitchell was racking them up
Rock kept mitchell to just 7 second half possessions (2 of them were free kicks)
Not sure why the angst against this move