Interloper
Club Legend
Yeah I get your reasoning DW. So I think it's a combination of factors. The possibility that they see enough in training etc that we don't to make them think they're worth persevering with and the possibility that no-one else took their fancy. I also think that a big list turnover, rookie or main list, may not be the preferred option in Footscrays first year for reasons of stability and continuity while Footscray is established.Still doesn't make sense to me. Why not just list them for Footscray then?
I am OK with retaining Jong and am prepared to give some benefit of doubt to Redpath (though not convinced yet). However Greenwood I don't get at all.
The great and proven value of the rookie system is that you can bring low cost players into the system without sacrificing a high pick. If you try enough of them you will occasionally unearth a star (eg Morris, Boyd, Dahlhaus, etc). To make this work you have to be prepared to turn rookies over fairly promptly if they aren't showing much. Why aren't we doing that?
I just hope J Mac knows something we don't wrt Greenwood and Redpath.
For all the questions, and possibly like you, the recruiting team and coaches of the last couple of years have enough credit in the bank for me to run with it.
Edit: the new strength and conditioning guy also seems particularly impressive and the results of his input from the beginning of this past season may be very influential across the two teams this coming season