Literally. Roughead. Irrespective of his capabilities. Sure he was supposed to be Grundy’s relief in Ruck from time to time. Can’t be any worse than when Maxy used to be pinch Ruck when Jolly was still with us too.Please explain?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Literally. Roughead. Irrespective of his capabilities. Sure he was supposed to be Grundy’s relief in Ruck from time to time. Can’t be any worse than when Maxy used to be pinch Ruck when Jolly was still with us too.Please explain?
Literally. Roughead. Irrespective of his capabilities. Sure he was supposed to be Grundy’s relief in Ruck from time to time. Can’t be any worse than when Maxy used to be pinch Ruck when Jolly was still with us too.
Agree with you there. Could we go Howe as a forward for last two weeks?Fair point......but Roughead has been our best defender this year IMO and I think it is wrong to change that.
Last week proved that for me.
Agree with you there. Could we go Howe as a forward for last two weeks?
If Moore trained with the forwards today, l would throw him in this week against Adelaide. The longer they leave him out, the less confidence he will have in his body, then the doubt grows.As I said last week let’s not mess with our defense.
Send Madgen forward this week......Moore takes over against the Dons.
As I said last week let’s not mess with our defense.
Send Madgen forward this week......Moore takes over against the Dons.
If Moore trained with the forwards today, l would throw him in this week against Adelaide. The longer they leave him out, the less confidence he will have in his body, then the doubt grows.
I think you leave Roughead fwd, and if they are belting us, you make the switch- otherwise we have no chance if Madgen starts fwd given his lack of experience.
Let Madgen start where he is most comfortable.
I would rather it this week. Option of between a 95% Moore or Madgen, take Moore every time.Unlike most I have full faith in Moore.
He isn’t the same Moore from last year.
Whether it is this week or next week I am not fussed.
You always want players that are basically unattainable.
11 disposals 3 marks........I am sure Madgen can manage close to that.
Roughead beating Walker is more important IMO.
We all like classy players, but as it stands we don’t have the currency for either of them unless we start offloading required players.No Cogs, Whitfield etc are unattainable I'm sorry I like class that makes our team better hopefully we pick up Jenkins that make you happy?
So what? They’re both contracted and required players at this point. Until either of them declares they want to leave, which is frankly unlikely, you can’t really use them as currency can you?No guarantees that Grundy and Moore stay.
It makes no sense to play Madgen fwd IMO.
May as well drop him and play Lynch and let Grundy play fwd while Lynch rucks for substantial parts of the game.
At least we have some potency with Grundy fwd - Madgen offers nothing fwd.
It made no sense playing Roughead forward but we still did it.....and failed.
I think Lynch is cooked this year by the way.
I've done my homework, would you like me to include the chronically injured too?:
Forwards - Mihocek, Cox, Reid (Broken), Goldsack (Broken)
Defenders - Moore (borderline Broken), Roughead, Dunn (32 years old coming off 2 ACL's in 12 months), Madgen (26 years old, has played 6 games and has had 9 marks and 6 goals kicked on him twice, barely a tall).
Just thought I'd confirm, are we suggesting we include 30-year-olds coming off multiple injuries or are we actually going to discuss genuine KKP stocks going forward?
Dunno if pre-season helps you not be afraid of your own shadow. Bloke is an absolute pea-heart.
Footy forum too champ, not a fan club. You and Will could both doing with a bit of toughening up.
Scodog10 where would you play Tomlinson if we had him?
Whilst we have an need for KPP, looking through our list, I still think we need some future A grade mids as well from the draft to help eventually replace Penldes, Beams in due course.
Need Hine to start getting creative and start identifying some quality young talent ASAP.
Remember we have a good looking NGA big bodied mid in 2020 and Daicos in 2021 who look like rippers.Whilst we have an need for KPP, looking through our list, I still think we need some future A grade mids as well from the draft to help eventually replace Penldes, Beams in due course.
Need Hine to start getting creative and start identifying some quality young talent ASAP.
We seem to have our wires crossed. I am saying he was primarily delisted because he was not good enough... the shoulder issues stamped his papers early. Nothing he has done since makes me want to recruit him back to the club. We should never recruit for depth. Recruit for talent and best 22 impact. Ccover your depth by getting experience into your young draft talent.
Sorry, I was under the impression we were discussing legitimate KKP stocks.So... just here to confirm what you said stated earlier was in fact bulls**t?
Because you literally just said we only have 2 KPD and 2 KPF on our list.
Im reading a total of 8 KPP players pointed out there. With some capable others not being mentioned - Howe, Murphy.
Also, we drafted Kelly.
Cheers. Try again next time