Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I remember reading a study a few years back that 6 day breaks were negligible, but back to back 6 day breaks when they occurred were quite significantIs there any evidence that sides with longer breaks perform better?
You are wrong. Surely you remember 2018.
Because they’re playing Collingwood, that’s why.
Top side have been given the Friday game for yonks. Many people don't realise or mind that it could be construed as an advantage ....... until its awarded to Collingwood.
I for one think that all finals should be played simultaneously at 2pm Saturday.
Completely fair.
No one is going to have a problem with that right......
Until such time the lower finishing team can suck a 6 day break up.
If it was 5 days you would have an argument but a 6 day break is a standard break across a season and they had a bye like two weeks ago ffs.
It was the League pandering to Melbourne & Carlton for a big Friday night Semi that got things out of kilter.Do you think it would be different if the positions were reversed?
No chance.
while your at it look at the 1913,1991 and 1997 final series(2 grand finals 3 v 4 and 5 v 6 elimination finals & crows home final against higher ranked team,then the colbert mark,well that was an umpire,but the rest afl clusterfxxx all going against the saints & in 1997 case geelong and the bulldogs)AFL isn't about fairness. Look at this year StKilda get a home final on a ground they've played less games on than the oppistion.
It was the League pandering to Melbourne & Carlton for a big Friday night Semi that got things out of kilter.
They should have played Saturday and all would then be fine.
But 96,000 turned up, so the League is delighted.
while your at it look at the 1913,1991 and 1997 final series(2 grand finals 3 v 4 and 5 v 6 elimination finals & crows home final against higher ranked team,then the colbert mark,well that was an umpire,but the rest afl clusterfxxx all going against the saints & in 1997 case geelong and the bulldogs)
Because the bookies want Collingwood to win and they have the best draw money can buy.Why do giants get only a six day break?
while your at it look at the 1913,1991 and 1997 final series(2 grand finals 3 v 4 and 5 v 6 elimination finals & crows home final against higher ranked team,then the colbert mark,well that was an umpire,but the rest afl clusterfxxx all going against the saints & in 1997 case geelong and the bulldogs)
To be fair on GWS, I haven’t heard anything from them complaining about the short break. It’s other supporters.Imagine saying you are the form team of the comp in finals, finish 7th but whinge about a shorter break.
Awaiting the tears when GWS get toweled up on Friday night...morons will blame the 6 day break.
Not the fact that Collingwood are a better team and that GWS Bradbury'd a finals spot.
How did GWS Bradbury anything?
They've gone 10-2 since the bye (including finals) and have beaten Melbourne, Carlton, St Kilda and now Port all in away games.
They've simply been a good football side playing good football and getting the wins they needed after a slow start to the season.
lucky they only started rigging it after the Tigers won three eh?Because the AFL wants Collingwood to win the flag.