Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Maybe. I wouldn't know. But I would certainly think it likely that the Alan Joneses and the Andrew Bolts and their fellow travellers have far greater sway over public opinion than "officialdom".
Throwing eggs at people who aren't Adam Goodes is fine?I think you missed something...
Then said it wasn't her fault, that she should not be harassed.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Goodes is a saint. The crowd is scum. The AFL have made their view on this very clear.Throwing eggs at people who aren't Adam Goodes is fine?
You've missed my point thenYou're repeating his sentiments.
Can we have a filter for pillock?Can we have a filter for SJW please?
What pillock came up with this abbreviation?
It's good for my business, not gonna lie.Throwing eggs at people who aren't Adam Goodes is fine?
Social justice warriorWhat is sjw?


It is used by bigots of every flavour to shout down anyone with the opinion that the world would be a better place if bigots kept their views to themselves. It is apparently the worst insult one person can say to another.
First the minutes applauseRunning through the same banner?
Over the top.
Well the all encompassing moral police, the A F LThrowing eggs at people who aren't Adam Goodes is fine?
Caged or free range eggs?It's good for my business, not gonna lie.
I've got some sitting out in the sun - they'll be nice and ripe by the next time we play SydneyCaged or free range eggs?
A piece of eggshell in somebody's eye never hurt anybody.Well the all encompassing moral police, the A F L
, haven't said its not ok have they ?
I can hear my mothers voiceA piece of eggshell in somebody's eye never hurt anybody.
False metric. Just because Bolt and his ilk are criticizing Goodes, just because they are framing booing as a pivotal free speech issue, doesn't mean they are only vindicated by the booing continuing.Let's see. If the booing stops I'd say you're wrong. If it continues, you may be right.
Close thread?That leaves me very confused.![]()
As you would in his position.You've missed my point then
Unlike me , he made no allowance for the fact that she may NOT have meant it to be racist
He immediately presumed she meant it in a racial context.
Yep.No investigation - no contact with her - very happy to run with " call racism where I see it " story straight after the game
What were his exact words about it the next day? I know they've been posted but I don't have the links.Had all night and the best he could do was maintain that she was racist the next day to a full press conference
False metric. Just because Bolt and his ilk are criticizing Goodes, just because they are framing booing as a pivotal free speech issue, doesn't mean they are only vindicated by the booing continuing.
The important thing for them is to get enough people pigeonholing Goodes as opinionated and self-important, and as jumping in with what they want seen as the human rights "industry".
Best we first establish who the "permanently outraged" are. I see plenty on both sides of this discussion.Oh come on. You're a bigot if you're sick of the perpetually outraged? SJW is fine.
Lots of morons go to the footy and therefore he will get booed.I'm actually anxious about the Geelong v Sydney match. If he gets booed all game with every touch again this will be all over the media more than ever.