I wouldn't. Petrevski Seton> Pickett and we'll get McCarthy another way.I'd be happy with McCarthy and Pickett for our first pick and hopefully get a 2nd rounder (20-24) for Mayne's compo, which should land us a decent KPP player.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

I wouldn't. Petrevski Seton> Pickett and we'll get McCarthy another way.I'd be happy with McCarthy and Pickett for our first pick and hopefully get a 2nd rounder (20-24) for Mayne's compo, which should land us a decent KPP player.
The assault charge combined with the fact his form has declined from a couple of years ago probably means he wouldn't be of interest to us IMO, certainly not for a decent draft pick. He's out of contract in 2017. We'll talk in a year. Until then he can stay at Hawthorn.
I wouldn't. Petrevski Seton> Pickett and we'll get McCarthy another way.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'd be happy with McCarthy and Pickett for our first pick and hopefully get a 2nd rounder (20-24) for Mayne's compo, which should land us a decent KPP player.
I feel like Brad Hill is the type of player who looks good in a Hawthorn side but will look crap in ours. The Hill brothers might enjoy playing together though. But then again, Brad has just been charged with assault so I'm not sure I wanna go there...
How's his job security with you blokes? Likely to be part of the furniture for years to come or...?
That's was an excuse to get out Brisbane, he was playing neafl and never looked much chance of playing in front of Martin and Luenburger at the time. As I said I don't really rate him but just throwing up names who might be approachable, tradeable. Saints could use a hard mid, deboer, Barlow, Suban type.
Brisbane promised longer game time
As for deboer barlow and suban. Barlow doesnt meet the age demographic and deboer and suban are foot soldiers which we already have enough of in spades.
If we lost longer we'd be wanting something significant. The way you guys value someone like pearce or weller is how we value longer. Longer is still a baby in ruck terms and is seen as our best luck prospect given hes a pick 8 selection
Apparently they see longer as a better prospect long term. Longer wasnt ready come round 1 due to rehab from injury. Since then hickey has been very good bar the wce game, so he has kept longer out of the side.Hickey not better?
Saints would be mad to let go of any of them tbh.Apparently they see longer as a better prospect long term. Longer wasnt ready come round 1 due to rehab from injury. Since then hickey has been very good bar the wce game, so he has kept longer out of the side.
I think they want hickey and longer to be pushing each other and fighting for spots
Lewis pierce is one to watch. Developing nicely as a project player
Spot on. Emma quayle explained really well our ruck situation in her book. They had an emphasis on developing their own ruck stocks which is something we hadnt done for a whileSaints would be mad to let go of any of them tbh.
There's no way we're getting Longer.
Looks good when everything is going well for the team. When the going gets tough, he is missing.
B Hill wouldn't work hard enough under Ross.
You think Clarkson carries a guy for 3 premierships who doesn't work hard enough?
Running is his strength.
He's a touch physically soft, but he runs his guts out. Both ways.
I actually reckon Brad Hill is a down hill skier. Looks a million bucks when the team is going well, but unsited when there is a hard ball to be won. Josh Hill esque.You think Clarkson carries a guy for 3 premierships who doesn't work hard enough?
beat me to it by 1 min!Well camouflaged. I haven't seen it.
When Hawks are on so is Brad. When they need a call to arms, Brad goes missing.
Therein is the problem that makes it difficult to assess his value, they usually are dominating games.
Having said that, he isn't flying this year.
Maybe another Headland ( Kerr ) , good in a great team not so much in a team that is not so great.Well camouflaged. I haven't seen it.
When Hawks are on so is Brad. When they need a call to arms, Brad goes missing.
Therein is the problem that makes it difficult to assess his value, they usually are dominating games.
Having said that, he isn't flying this year.
That an interesting way to put it.
He is OOC. I think he only signed short term last time to see if we would utilise him , the faith shown this year one would think that he now feels a part of the side, not a door knocker. Of course anything and everything is up for adjustment as time goes on. On our board were trying to work out what he be worth, so I was interested what you would try to entice him with.
Well camouflaged. I haven't seen it.
When Hawks are on so is Brad. When they need a call to arms, Brad goes missing.
Therein is the problem that makes it difficult to assess his value, they usually are dominating games.
Having said that, he isn't flying this year.
Well camouflaged? It couldn't be more obvious. You need your eyes checked if you haven't seen the power of running that comes from Hill, Smith and now Hartung.
And it's a chicken/egg scenario. You could argue Hawks dominate because of Hill/Smith. Two of their most important players. Obviously they need the team to help them out, but the hard work done by the tough nuts needs to be complemented by players on the outside. It's a group effort, you need players of all types.


