Recommitted Lachie Whitfield [re-signed]

Remove this Banner Ad

You didn't say he was a topic?
The thread on the drafts board is called Lachie Whitfield. But Lachie Whitfield isnt a topic of that thread.


You make a no sense.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Lachie would look good in brown a gold. A future 1st for lachie and a future 2nd should do it

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Yeah i dont think draft picks will be involved sadly. Most likely will be for a player.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Ummm are you ok?

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 
Here is a thread on the trade board. If you dont like the speculation dont read.

No point coming here and having a sook because he is a topic.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

The thread on the drafts board is called Lachie Whitfield. But Lachie Whitfield isnt a topic of that thread.


You make a no sense.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
Ummm are you ok?

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Yeah the 1st suggestuon should get it done trade value wise.

The second was reflection on what might be more realistic taking hawthorn and gws situation into account.

Not hard to follow.
 
This guy is delusional. Best leave him to his own devices.
Which would probably be crayons and blank paper by the looks of things, General.
Stop the QQ.

You need to wake up to reality.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Stop the QQ.

You need to wake up to reality.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Here's some reality.

1) Contracted.
2) Does not want to return to Melbourne.

And QQ doesn't mean what you think it means hahahahahaha
 
And that of your doctor im sure.

Still havent said why you think a star contracted player, who is happy up here, after going through the building stages would want to leave to a team who are just about to start all over again.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Its conjecture, Lachie is a player i would like to see at the hawks and i think a trade could get done if it comes to that.

Hypotheticals are at home here, its the drafts and trade board.
 
Its conjecture, Lachie is a player i would like to see at the hawks and i think a trade could get done if it comes to that.

Hypotheticals are at home here, its the drafts and trade board.
I create a thread about a Vic superstar with no actual credentials id be called a troll and itd be deleted in 10 mins.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 
Here's some reality.

1) Contracted.
2) Does not want to return to Melbourne.

And QQ doesn't mean what you think it means hahahahahaha
I have a little idea and im playing on both of its misconceptions.

You really should QQ though.
 
I create a thread about a Vic superstar with no actual credentials id be called a troll and itd be deleted in 10 mins.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Maybe, i dont have a strong opinon on that. I myself wouldnt though

But if a thread exists posters should be allowed to post on it with out this mob mentality going on.

Not you but the other guy is just sooking for the sake of it.
 
I have no idea as I just looked it up Urban Dictionary and im pretending to be playing on both of its misconceptions.

You really should QQ though.

Fixed that one up for you so it is truthful.

You're welcome.
 
Maybe, i dont have a strong opinon on that. I myself wouldnt though

But if a thread exists posters should be allowed to post on it with out this mob mentality going on.

Not you but the other guy is just sooking for the sake of it.
Lol Of course you dont. Youre in a thread about a Giant heading to vic.
1 who is contracted and has said often he isnt going anywhere.


I disagree. He has put forward his view point on the subject.

You may not like his viewpoint but if expect to have yours allowed to be put across he should have that same right.


Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 
Lol Of course you dont. Youre in a thread about a Giant heading to vic.
1 who is contracted and has said often he isnt going anywhere.


I disagree. He has put forward his view point on the subject.

You may not like his viewpoint but if expect to have yours allowed to be put across he should have that same right.


Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
I didnt mind his view point, it had merit. I just suggested it was misdirected. I didnt create this thread and thats where his concers lie.
 
Bruest is always the player that gets brought up in threads like this.

In the past GWS have offered alot but he is a few years older now.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

It would have been good if GWS made the trade, maybe they dodge the bullets of Picket and Ahern and just go for Marchbank. Now that GWS aren't up the wazoo in draft picks as before it would be a different story. Looking back on it that trade might have been a win/win, reckon Hawks would have flagged in 15 without Breust.

Breust's currency has deteriorated quite a bit since then. In such a trade he'd be steak knives. Breust and a future first for Whitfield might be the go.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top