Remove this Banner Ad

Do Richmond get a pass mark if they fail to win a final?

Straight Sets for Richmond is a

  • Pass

    Votes: 38 20.4%
  • Fail

    Votes: 148 79.6%

  • Total voters
    186

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

They're my tip for the flag.*


Play an awesome brand of high pressure footy that reminds me of my mob in 2010-11. Backline with Grimes, Rance and Astbury has been one of the best performed this year though most folks seem to focus on what the small forward pressure brings.

Have 15 blokes in career best form I reckon. And momentum. The Tigers are a huge chance and it's great for footy.

But would failing to win a final spell failure? Depends who they play and how they lose them.


*I tipped 110 in the H&A.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

richmonds game wont hold them up in finals IMO, ive seen it so many times...
too many inexperienced players, and they cant handle pressure, too small forward line also

its 50:50 imo, its a pass and a fail if the lose both
FWIW I somewhat agree, but surprised how many Dogs fans are giving us none.

You'd think they'd know a thing or two about being written off.
 
the good thing for Richmond is that Menegola plays one solid game every month. He will shit himself over the next couple of weeks so it's all left to Dangerfield and maybe Selwood.
Taylor isn't kicking a bag on Rance again so Richmond is going to beat us at the MCG in a fortnight.
They play that ground better than us and they won't lose a player early on in the game like they did last time these two teams met.

I think the question should be, do Geelong get a pass mark if they go out in straight sets.
 
WelloffThirdGlowworm-size_restricted.gif
If you take the Trump approach of 'winning', you'll be out in straight sets without scoring a single point
 
I think the question should be, do Geelong get a pass mark if they go out in straight sets.

I'm sure the media love in and I guess ans of both teams won't be too harsh on them. But any top 4 team that loses the first final..... and.or goes out in straight sets should feel very silly (like Hawthorn letting a golden opportunity slip last year).
 

Remove this Banner Ad

FWIW I somewhat agree, but surprised how many Dogs fans are giving us none.

You'd think they'd know a thing or two about being written off.

Our game style last year was built for finals. And we were the kings of winning close games. Unlike the dogs 08-10.

I'm just not sold on Richmond just yet
 
Because we made top 4.
Because the club looks at the last 2 years as the start of a new team.
Because we just finished with equal most wins for a season with 9 or 10 under 50 game players each week.
I expect to win at least one final.Lets leave it at that.For the time being.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You also said we would not even make finals. Do not filter this thread with your bottom 4 tears
You keep track of everyone who predicted the Tigers wouldn't make finals? What an exciting life you lead.

You'll be the one in tears when Dusty leaves for a bottom 4 team.
 
Have done very well to finish 3rd at the end of the H&A season, who would've thought they'd be within a win of top spot at the end of the year going into the season? But with the finals looming, this is where Richmond are really going to be judged. Like most on here have said, going out in straight sets would be a fail. Playing Geelong first up is going to be interesting. Haven't beaten them since 2006, so what an opportunity for Richmond to break the streak against Geelong as well as winning their first final since 2001. I'm leaning towards Geelong however. Going to be a big finals series for the Tigers, they need to win a final but I have my doubts.
 
I don't think so. I give them a good chance of rolling Sydney if you beat them first up.
Yeah? I certainly would be happy with that scenario - do you feel playing at the G would make the difference? Or simply the tigers match up well?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom