Oh yes just like McCarthy was the saviour of your forward line too.
I’d have more faith in Hogan and Lobb delivering than Hanneberry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh yes just like McCarthy was the saviour of your forward line too.
That’s a cool story.I’d have more faith in Hogan and Lobb delivering than Hanneberry.
That’s a cool story.
You're coming across as a highly intelligent lad right now.That’s a cool story.
No way, a new recruit killing it in preseason. Stop the pressers.You think it’s even debatable?
27 y.o. banged up midfielder versus
23 y.o. key position forward and a 25 y.o 207cm ruck / forward.
I think it will be a line ball who delivers more in 2019, Conca or Hanneberry. How’s your players preseason going? Conca fit as ****, hasn’t missed a session. First full preseason in half a decade. Now I’m not saying Conca is a gun, quite the opposite. But that’s the level you might get out of Hanneberry this year.
No way, a new recruit killing it in preseason. Stop the pressers.
Obviously our preseason is going great, as is 17 other clubs.
To even suggest Conca in the same breath as Hannebery is laughable.
No way, a new recruit killing it in preseason. Stop the pressers.
Obviously our preseason is going great, as is 17 other clubs.
You judge players output on their SuperCoach scores?How bout some sort of friendly bet on that? Some arbitrary measure like average super coach points per game for the year. A bonus for playing more games, say a 5 game differential gives you a 15% bonus...what you say?
In the past Hanneberry >>>> Conca. But I’m talking 2019 onwards.
Haha yeh cant really argue with that.16 other clubs.
Carlton certainly not having a great pre-season. That is something we can all agree on.
You judge players output on their SuperCoach scores?
As I said previously, Hannebery isn’t likely to get back to his old form, his leadership is something we lacked and that will be invaluable for our very young list.
I don’t think you can compare, Hanners coming in is A LOT more valuable to our team then Conca is to yours.Nah super coach is rubbish. But couldn’t think of an easier objective method of comparing them.
I don’t think you can compare, Hanners coming in is A LOT more valuable to our team then Conca is to yours.
What about Conca makes you think he’ll be a good player for you?Maybe. On leadership though, interesting that Conca has been added to ours. We clearly lacked in this area.
What about Conca makes you think he’ll be a good player for you?
that wasnt my questionI think he’ll play as well as Hanneberry, over the next 3-4 years.
that wasnt my question
What? You're talking up Conca so I'm asking what about his game do you like and think will be good for your team?You can extrapolate...how good do you think Hanneberry will be?
What? You're talking up Conca so I'm asking what about his game do you like and think will be good for your team?
I get that everyone (or at least most) who don't barrack for St Kilda- or perhaps Sydney) is hoping that Dan's body continues to trouble him, and that he won't play good footy again, but the fact is that he's only 27yo (about to turn 28), not 32 going-on 33, so only time will tell whether he's able to get his body going well again or not.I think Conca will average around 20 possessions a game and play 15+ games.
Hopefully for your sake that happens, it would be a career best year for him.I think Conca will average around 20 possessions a game and play 15+ games.
Oh really?I’m not sure bastardisation means what you think it means