Sloane is cookedHa ha some things never change! Wait until Talia, Sloane and Fog all request out!! We are the club that keeps on giving
Talia wont leave bookmark it
Fog..... he will play 200 games for us
On SM-G973F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Sloane is cookedHa ha some things never change! Wait until Talia, Sloane and Fog all request out!! We are the club that keeps on giving
Vader - you'll know better than most, was there some issue about not matching and then finding out you got crappy compensation? as in we have to choose to match or not before we find out compo? i seem to remember that being a problem with selwood going from wce to cats?
Not directly. We could agree to trade for one of their lesser players, freeing up space in their salary cap, thereby allowing them to increase their offer.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Will be interesting what we do with picks 1 and 2.
Hollands and Thilthorpe/McDonald.
Reckon it will be McDonald.
Then somehow get O'Driscoll with Dogs first rounder.
Upgrade our GWS pick to get Thilthorpe?
Thank you for the clarificationNothing trigger or performance related is included, only the base line guaranteed payment.
Yay, pick 25.
Oh well, he never lived up to the hype. Laird has already shown as much as an inside mid.
If St Kilda make an official offer, which Brad accepts, and Adelaide chooses not to match, then that's it - he departs via FA and there is no trade.So that rules out a trade then if you won’t be matching?
A consistent year for Brad in a Victorian side should surely get him up into Brownlow contention.Injuries have stopped him being a Brownlow medalist. I still firmly believe that.
Even 'Fully Fit' now he'll never have the physical ability he looked to have when younger.
I'm not sure how they could ping us for draft tampering, provided the side trade is seen as fair and we don't leave any ****ing paper trail for them to follow and use as evidence against us.Absolutely could - however, I feel that's bordering on draft tampering. Genuine question - has any club successfully done this?
It's great how many people have just assumed we'll get pick 2. I'm sure that won't backfire and lead to disappointment or anything
A consistent year for Brad in a Victorian side should surely get him up into Brownlow contention.
I wish I shared your confidence. Right now I'm struggling to see Fog getting to 100 AFL games in his entire career, unless he pulls his finger out and quickly.Fog..... he will play 200 games for us
Sorry for another intrusion. But yes, that’s the official policy. Although no doubt the AFL would be telling the crows if it’s band 1 or band 2 even if it shouldn’t technically happen until after.
If St Kilda make an official offer, which Brad accepts, and Adelaide chooses not to match, then that's it - he departs via FA and there is no trade.
There are two ways in which this could turn into a trade:
- Adelaide matches St Kilda's offer, and Brad still decides that he wants to leave.
- St Kilda choose to trade, rather than make an official FA offer (e.g. Dangerfield trade to Geelong).
If we'd finished 1st, Band 2 would be the same as Band 1. Not in the 40sIf we finished first this year we'd be complaining that the band 1 compensation isn't enough (pick 20-26) and no one would be even questioning if he was band 1 or not. Band 2 would be a pick in the 40s which isn't realistic. Luckily Adelaides finishing position has no impact on determining band status.
I'm fairly sure they're happy to match anything which doesn't net us the Band 1 compensation pick. $$$ certainly wouldn't be an issue - contract length could, however, be a sticking point.Yes that’s true. But both those trade scenarios rely on Adelaide being willing to pay brad what the saints have offered. Which may or may not be the case.
I'm fairly sure they're happy to match anything which doesn't net us the Band 1 compensation pick. $$$ certainly wouldn't be an issue - contract length could, however, be a sticking point.
Aware of that. My point is that this is the only unknown part of the equation. We know that the club will match the $$$ side of things, if the offer isn't high enough for Band 1.You have to match contract length though.
Compensation picks aren't announced until after the final paperwork is lodged. We won't know what compensation we'll receive until it's too late to do anything about it.