Play Nice Scott Morrison - How Long? Part 7 - Prosperity Theology, The Coal Man + His Bootlickers

[BigTacoBandit]

So in the statement Djokovic makes the point that kicking him out jeopardises the viability of continuing to host the AO. Hawke just dismisses it.

Almost like they taunting them to leave. Like they did to Holden.

 

[Festerz]

More gems from Morrison's MH/Age interview:

So paraphrasing:

- getting the disgraced NSW Premier into Federal Parliament was Morrison's attempt at getting equal representation for women.

- this noble gesture was foiled by the misogynists.

- But he'll keep trying to fight for the right for women to be treated fairly.


I mean he actually believes this cr@p??

 

[Opine]

I don’t understand the contradiction by some. On one hand there is disapproval of those who refuse to be vaccinated. On the other, there is disapproval of a minister not permitting a high profile unvaccinated non-Australian from remaining in AU.

 

[kirky]

He lies about lying in there too.



I see the point but it goes soft. Should have linked and referenced to

-backgrounding Brittney Higgens

• his office lying about his Hawaiian holiday
• stating his pedo mate trying to get into the Whitehouse was “gossip”
• voting against a RC into banks - 26 times

No vision for the country, not 2 years down the track and certainly not 20-30 years

The article confirms that he actually isn’t a strategist or visionary. Everything is in the moment.

And the saying - “you can’t soar like an eagle when you surround yourself with turkeys” is apt.

 

[Crankyhawk]

I don’t understand the contradiction by some. On one hand there is disapproval of those who refuse to be vaccinated. On the other, there is disapproval of a minister not permitting a high profile unvaccinated non-Australian from remaining in AU.

thought the issue with the feds re Novaxx was more around the confusing way it occurred, failure of Border force to enforce the law if the law was unvaxxed aren't allowed in, the delay until 5:55 pm on a Friday to make the decision to overrule court (which cynically appears an attempt to avoid scrutiny) when it doesn't appear that there needed to be much to consider (ie the decision likely predetermined and timed for media effect)

 

[QuietB]

Did you read this article? Because I strongly recommend you look past the headline and do just that.

As Mike Carlton puts it:

It is an entire essay on Scott Morrison “rejecting the premise” and shape shifting his image into something else.

If they published it without Morrison’s lies and rebuttals maybe it would mean something

 

[Festerz]

I don’t understand the contradiction by some. On one hand there is disapproval of those who refuse to be vaccinated. On the other, there is disapproval of a minister not permitting a high profile unvaccinated non-Australian from remaining in AU.

You're misrepresenting the issue.

The disapproval (for the most part) is of the utterly botched up way in which this Government handled the cancellation of the Visa. Done purely for polical reasons just days after the PM said it was not a matter for his government. A process thrown out of court for the lack of proper process and attention given to Djokovic's rights.

And the hypocrisy behind the reason now given in court by the Federal Government for cancelling Djokovic's visa (exciting anti vaxxers) given this government holds on to minority government entirely due to the support of the two most vocal anti vaxxers in Australia.

 

[Stan_Darsh72]

View attachment 1311119
ok mete

CHAD AlBROnese vs fat virgin scotty

 

[carltonchelsea]

It is an entire essay on Scott Morrison “rejecting the premise” and shape shifting his image into something else.

If they published it without Morrison’s lies and rebuttals maybe it would mean something

Yep, the greatest problem that Scott Morrison faces, is that he “is” Scott Morrison.

 

[Pessimistic]

You lefties can cry all you want. He’ll romp in the next election regardless as the ALP has no balls and the fat bullfrog leading them is as inspiring as dishwater

As we all get visibly and actually collectively dumber, let’s celebrate ey?

 

[Festerz]

It is an entire essay on Scott Morrison “rejecting the premise” and shape shifting his image into something else.

If they published it without Morrison’s lies and rebuttals maybe it would mean something

You miss the point. Intelligent people can read the article and see it for the utter BS Morrison is pedalling - they don't need someone to spoon feed them how to think.

As the journo says in her first paragraph:

The interview opportunity has come with a promise: nothing will be off-limits.

Despite this, I know from previous interactions with him that he’s skilled in the arts of deflection and circumlocution, and unvarnished candour from any politician is unlikely with an unofficial election campaign already in full swing.

So to get the interview she does what honest thing - asks the right questions and publishes the answers in full for us to judge, without editing them to suit a pre determined position. And in doing so Morrison is hoisted on his own petard of BS.

That to me is honest journalism.

People are capable of reading and forming their own opinion, you know.

 

[Pessimistic]

More gems from Morrison's MH/Age interview:

So paraphrasing:

- getting the disgraced NSW Premier into Federal Parliament was Morrison's attempt at getting equal representation for women.

- this noble gesture was foiled by the misogynists.

- But he'll keep trying to fight for the right for women to be treated fairly.


I mean he actually believes this cr@p??

So nothing to do with a person with an image problem already thought being associated with scomo was a step too far?

I don’t think Gladys became NSW premier on a quota so why even discuss it at a federal level?

Apart from the fact his govt is literally making the federal level irrelevant. Just outsource the whole shebang

 

[Maddo11]

You lefties can cry all you want. He’ll romp in the next election regardless as the ALP has no balls and the fat bullfrog leading them is as inspiring as dishwater

Obviously bait, but very telling that anyone not in the LNP camp is a "leftie" despite there being quite a lot of space between the now RW LNP and the "centre"

 

[Opine]

thought the issue with the feds re Novaxx was more around the confusing way it occurred, failure of Border force to enforce the law if the law was unvaxxed aren't allowed in, the delay until 5:55 pm on a Friday to make the decision to overrule court (which cynically appears an attempt to avoid scrutiny) when it doesn't appear that there needed to be much to consider (ie the decision likely predetermined and timed for media effect)

It may well very have been handled better, but, regardless, AH’s main responsibility is to act in the interests of AU public.

 

[Pessimistic]

thought the issue with the feds re Novaxx was more around the confusing way it occurred, failure of Border force to enforce the law if the law was unvaxxed aren't allowed in, the delay until 5:55 pm on a Friday to make the decision to overrule court (which cynically appears an attempt to avoid scrutiny) when it doesn't appear that there needed to be much to consider (ie the decision likely predetermined and timed for media effect)

They apparently let two people in under the same circumstances, but blinked when it was someone high profile?

Based on him being a figurehead for anti vaxxers? What is the proof of that, apart from their own sandman argument?


We all have skin in the game in getting our officialdom as accountable as possible, without non legal interests being included.

What next? No atheists? Not as fanciful a call as before scomos time.

 

[Pessimistic]

It may well very have been handled better, but, regardless, AH’s main responsibility is to act in the interests of AU public.

Based on what provable threat exactly?

 

[Gough]

If this government acted in the best interests of the Australian public it would be breaking the habit of a lifetime.

 

[Pessimistic]

But let’s not pretend inviting in then turning on overseas celebs isn’t somewhat of a national pastime

 

[Opine]

Based on what provable threat exactly?

I don’t think they need to prove any actual threat. Only that a threat of the kind they’ve outlined is a reasonable possibility.

 

[CakeEater]

Company part-owned by Angus Taylor challenges ‘critically endangered’ listing of grasslands it poisoned

Jam Land was found to have illegally cleared protected grassland in Corrowong but says the original listing was invalid

www.theguardian.com

Great job Angus, well done

 

[Festerz]

Based on what provable threat exactly?

This is the argument as I understand it (as summarised in yesterday's Federal Court directions hearing yesterday):

Australia, as with the rest of the world is in the midst of a global pandemic that threatens the lives and/or livelihoods of a large percentage of the population.

In response to this threat, the Australian government, as with most of the rests of the world, has a nation wide vaccination program underway that, while not mandated for all, requires high level compliance across the community to be successful.

Vaccinations ARE mandated by law for certain occupations and situations. And that includes foreign visitors except under very limited circumstances.

Djokovic's visa was cancelled yesterday because the government believes Djokovic's position regarding vaccines poses a threat to the government's community wide vaccination program, specifically that he will 'excite' the local anti vaccination agitators who threaten the success of their campaign against the pandemic.

Note that yesterday's visa cancellation is an entirely new process from the previous process and will be assessed in Federal Court tomorrow as a specific and stand alone set of circumstances.

 

[Pessimistic]

I don’t think they need to prove any actual threat. Only that a threat of the kind they’ve outlined is a reasonable possibility.

They haven’t described, yet alone proven a threat, from the person who performed admirably at the last and many previous Australian opens

Is not outspoken that much on anti vax apart from discussing his reasons.

He would tell porkies at 1% the rate of our average politician here

 

[campbell]

So in the statement Djokovic makes the point that kicking him out jeopardises the viability of continuing to host the AO. Hawke just dismisses it.

Almost like they taunting them to leave. Like they did to Holden.

Yep, obviously hasnt a strategic bone in his body.

 

[campbell]

I don’t think they need to prove any actual threat. Only that a threat of the kind they’ve outlined is a reasonable possibility.

Gawd, whats worse than a banana republic? We are officially at that level.

 

[Pessimistic]

Australia, as with the rest of the world is in the midst of a global pandemic that threatens the lives and/or livelihoods of a large percentage of the population.

In response to this threat, the Australian government, as with most of the rests of the world, has a nation wide vaccination program underway that, while not mandated for all, requires high level compliance across the community to be successful.

Vaccinations ARE mandated by law for certain occupations and situations. And that includes foreign visitors except under very limited circumstances.

Djokovic's visa was cancelled yesterday because the government believes Djokovic's position regarding vaccines poses a threat to the government's community wide vaccination program, specifically that he will 'excite' the local anti vaccination agitators who threaten the success of their campaign against the pandemic.

It’s going to be fun seeing them justify in court. A real court