In hindsight. He was comfortably best 22 in 2021 though.Declined rapidly early in 2021 ... 2022 should not have happened.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In hindsight. He was comfortably best 22 in 2021 though.Declined rapidly early in 2021 ... 2022 should not have happened.
McClure still believes that Martin can't be at Richmond in 2024. So I'd be taking this news with a whole heap of salt, instead of a pinchMcClure reckons we're leading the race for HH ahead of Swans and Pies.
McClure still believes that Martin can't be at Richmond in 2024. So I'd be taking this news with a whole heap of salt, instead of a pinch
Pretty costly draft pick if you ask me.Money isnt the issue. Salary cap is well covered. After the end of next season we won't be paying Dusty $1.4 mill a season, even if he decides to play on. You bring an established player like HH in who can play his role well. It doesn't cost us in draft picks.
It's a no brainer to me.
You throw enough darts at a dart board your bound to get 1 to hit. This could be the one that hits.
Pretty costly draft pick if you ask me.
In fairness, and I don't like the guy - that was an opinion, rather than a scoop. He generally has good mail.McClure still believes that Martin can't be at Richmond in 2024. So I'd be taking this news with a whole heap of salt, instead of a pinch
His constant harping on about Martin is heading elsewhere, hurts any credibility he had left.In fairness, and I don't like the guy - that was an opinion, rather than a scoop. He generally has good mail.
I reckon it was a legitimate chance last year, I don't think he made it up.His constant harping on about Martin is heading elsewhere, hurts any credibility he had left.
I have already spoken with MattyLike my post if you want HH
Disagree with my post if you don't want HH
I will forward my findings to the club LOL
McClure just gets his info from bigfooty since he got cut off at his LocalMcClure reckons we're leading the race for HH ahead of Swans and Pies.
I have already spoken with Matty
HH changed his mind after Dimma left and he is staying
I caught up with Matty today and he says is HH is back on after Kingsley played him in the backline and didn't give him any coaches votes on the weekendI have already spoken with Matty
HH changed his mind after Dimma left and he is staying
Yep, that's pretty much all the stuff you wrote in your original post, right?
Do you want me to repeat myself too?
Just in case ... The optics look bad right now mate.
Van Rooyen raises roof with speccy and double
Melbourne young gun Jacob van Rooyen rocks the 'G with two consecutive marks and goalswww.afl.com.au
Hmm not sure of his cred However I find it hard to believe we wouldn’t be considering he’s FA , the links to TT and Hopp will help no endMcClure reckons we're leading the race for HH ahead of Swans and Pies.
I know.What draft pick? He is a free agent.
Thats all part of the Free Agency makeupI know.
But because he's a FA somehow he's worth it.
If we had too trade is he still worth it?
Don’t have an issue with Blair as an individual, but I am kinda getting over the unit as a whole since 2018. I’ve noticed in the past few years that they’re reactive more than proactive.We got a list manager that compiled a list that won three flags , he’s done it once and can do it again . Blair is one bloke I wanna keep
For all this talk about HH being free and not having to trade for him.
Let me ask you all this.
What happens if we offer HH a deal of 3 x $800k and GWS decide to match?
Now before you all jump on and say that won't happen, so it's not worth discussing, let me remind you that GWS matched for Cameron when Geelong put forward a deal that everyone thought they wouldn't match because the deal was too big for them to match and they were going to get a first round pick for him & it would help free up cap space for them moving forward.
However GWS were more than happy to match for force Geelong to trade, so there is a good reason to believe that GWS couldn't look at our offer and think that matching and forcing a trade could net them a deal that better suits their list build strategy.
As it stands they already have 2 R1 picks this year as we know, with our pick and their own. They could very well decide that having another 2 x R1 picks in 2024 could be more valuable to them than having 3 picks in this years draft. They can then add 2 of the best available kids this year and then be in the market in 2024 for someone to bring in via trade in 2024 or they could then add another 1-2 highly rated kids in 2024 as they take the gamble that we have another year like this year and they end up with another top 10 pick anyway, all they've done is spread their picks across 2 years instead of having to take 3 this year.
With that in mind, would you HH fans still:
Want Richmond to follow through and complete the trade? Thus trading away yet another first round pick.
Or
Would you want them to look foolish and back away from the deal and hurt their reputation as a club that gets deals done once they commit to them?
Saying Dusty should go to the Suns on $500k over 3 years to clear $1.4 of our salary cap shows how much of an idea he has, love how Hutchy shuts him down lolYou throw enough darts at a dart board your bound to get 1 to hit. This could be the one that hits.
I'd say losing Taranto Hopper Bruhn & Hill last year, plus they may well have Ward retire and Preuss could be moved on having only play 10 games in 3 seasons since joining the Giants, would have helped ease their cap pressure.I believe and correct me if I’m wrong their Salary cap is still stretched to capacity with some more players to resign. I’d doubt we would put our offer in front of him if there was any hope of them matching. We just wouldn’t do it. The due diligence would be done well in advance