Remove this Banner Ad

Preview R4: Changes vs. Gold Coast Suns (Match of the Round!!!)

Will Murphy replace Rachele in the 23?


  • Total voters
    85
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Just imagine if Nicks plays Draper as a forward and Murphy as a centre square mid to replace Crouch

There is no doubt in my mind we played Murphy in the centre in the SANFL to pump up his numbers and justify his selection to the fans. Could you imagine us picking him as the next best guy if he was racking up 12 touches in our SANFL forward line? They've literally done everything to parachute him in
 
Just imagine if Nicks plays Draper as a forward and Murphy as a centre square mid to replace Crouch
John Goodman Lol GIF by Roseanne
 
The language around Crouch being "managed" is strange. Like they are covering the mismanagement of something last week. Surely either "omitted" or out due to injury is more accurate.

I wouldn't have picked Murphy with just Rachele out. But he seems an obvious pick at least as the sub with Crouch out too, and the option to use him as a tagger.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The language around Crouch being "managed" is strange. Like they are covering the mismanagement of something last week. Surely either "omitted" or out due to injury is more accurate.

I wouldn't have picked Murphy with just Rachele out. But he seems an obvious pick at least as the sub with Crouch out too, and the option to use him as a tagger.
We’ve never used Murphy as a tagger.

He is not the obvious pick as sub. Play Schoenberg as the sub who is in form and can rack up the possessions or Milera who is lucky to hold his spot
 
OMFG. Is Nix on here and just gets amused by all the melts or something?

How is it possible that Murphy is our next best waiting in the wings to cover for an injury or a rest? Surely 100+ games is enough to see what he has, or more importantly doesn't have. I'm just dumbfounded.

But at least we have a vote of confidence from inside the 4 walls......"He is one of a number of players with AFL experience that has been performing as well as they ever have in their careers, while the opportunity hasn’t been there for them at AFL level in the opening three rounds"

FMD......
 
Surely the Murphy IN is an April fool's joke. Nicks must really rate our seconds if Murphy is the next man up. FFS.
 
What’s the issue? Murphy had a very good SANFL game, Pedlar didn’t. When Draper came on he went to take Rachele’s forward role. We’re looking for a forward replacement for Rachele, and Pedlar is realistically the only other option. Pedlar is long long past being given ‘senior minutes’ to prove himself, I just don’t think he’s up to standard. Cook is maybe the other one and was a dogs breakfast against probably the worst SANFL team going round.

I really don’t know why people are scratching their heads, Murphy played himself into selection.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
That's as bewildering a comment as your namesake's Umpiring.

Murphy has proven himself to be a spud --- SPUD MURPHY --- at AFL level.
It's Nicks' job to find out who ELSE can stand up at the level, but none will if not given the chance.
Nicks had a chance to make a statement tonight, but he failed.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The love child is back, and Nicks as predictable as ever is back baby!!!

WTF these morons can't help themselves.l. Murphy shouldn't be allowed to bring out the oranges let alone play

Only hope is that Murphy or Sholl is sub, Nank to wing.
 
That's as bewildering a comment as your namesake's Umpiring.

Murphy has proven himself to be a spud --- SPUD MURPHY --- at AFL level.
It's Nicks' job to find out who ELSE can stand up at the level, but none will if not given the chance.
Nicks had a chance to make a statement tonight, but he failed.
He voted no to Murphy replacing Pedlar, oops
 
What’s the issue? Murphy had a very good SANFL game, Pedlar didn’t. When Draper came on he went to take Rachele’s forward role. We’re looking for a forward replacement for Rachele, and Pedlar is realistically the only other option. Pedlar is long long past being given ‘senior minutes’ to prove himself, I just don’t think he’s up to standard. Cook is maybe the other one and was a dogs breakfast against probably the worst SANFL team going round.

I really don’t know why people are scratching their heads, Murphy played himself into selection.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Is that you Nix?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Just imagine if Nicks plays Draper as a forward and Murphy as a centre square mid to replace Crouch

There is no doubt in my mind we played Murphy in the centre in the SANFL to pump up his numbers and justify his selection to the fans. Could you imagine us picking him as the next best guy if he was racking up 12 touches in our SANFL forward line? They've literally done everything to parachute him in

3 weeks ago.

He plays as a full time mid so that when he returns ahead of players like Dowling or Taylor, he hasn’t had 12 touches. Playing midfield he can get 20 and it looks like he’s in cracking form down there.

Re the emergency list, we always name a backup ruck or KPF/ruck, there’s nothing to be read into it. Bond is next defender up, not sure why he’s ahead of Nank and The Spud is small fwd/mid cover. If we lose a mid, it can be covered by greater minutes from existing 22 and Spudley plays forward.

The emergencies seem very logical to me. And they’re not necessarily set in stone, there’s a fine for bringing in a player not listed. So if ROB misses, we might play McAndrew and wear the fine.
 
What’s the issue? Murphy had a very good SANFL game, Pedlar didn’t. When Draper came on he went to take Rachele’s forward role. We’re looking for a forward replacement for Rachele, and Pedlar is realistically the only other option. Pedlar is long long past being given ‘senior minutes’ to prove himself, I just don’t think he’s up to standard. Cook is maybe the other one and was a dogs breakfast against probably the worst SANFL team going round.

I really don’t know why people are scratching their heads, Murphy played himself into selection.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Fail Charlie Brown GIF by Peanuts
 
No. We should have, but that would involve leaving Tex and a few others out.
This is the worst thing, we are setting ourselves up to lose 2 in a row by not managing the likes of Tex in hot conditions.
 
What’s the issue? Murphy had a very good SANFL game, Pedlar didn’t. When Draper came on he went to take Rachele’s forward role. We’re looking for a forward replacement for Rachele, and Pedlar is realistically the only other option. Pedlar is long long past being given ‘senior minutes’ to prove himself, I just don’t think he’s up to standard. Cook is maybe the other one and was a dogs breakfast against probably the worst SANFL team going round.

I really don’t know why people are scratching their heads, Murphy played himself into selection.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Imagine posting this after voting Murphy wouldn’t replace Rach 🤪😂
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Preview R4: Changes vs. Gold Coast Suns (Match of the Round!!!)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top