- Oct 2, 2022
- 4,555
- 6,013
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Really? I had no idea.Sydney picked Hayward six picks after we took Gallucci.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? I had no idea.Sydney picked Hayward six picks after we took Gallucci.
I've often wondered what would be a good way to measure recruiters ... it's not a level playing field but surely we can get an indication from the right stats?Yep and to keep Mutineer happy, just say it is true that Hamish wanted English but was overruled because Pyke wanted a mid, Pyke sure isn’t saying you must pick Gallucci. If Hamish didn’t rate Gallucci we are not picking him, it’s that simple.
I can’t believe that dud has kept his job for this long.
I reckon simple measure is how many mids have you drafted in 12 years with your first round picks. How many of your first round picks are good players and still playing.I've often wondered what would be a good way to measure recruiters ... it's not a level playing field but surely we can get an indication from the right stats?
Would something like the number of games / brownlow votes / finals for players drafted 1-10 / 11-20 etc... give an indication? Would have to be only players that are outside of academy / fs / nga ... or at least have the "special" cases separated?
I suppose the trading up / trading down count would tell a part of the story too?
Scorpus do you have this in a spreadsheet somewhere
Well right now ...I reckon simple measure is how many mids have you drafted in 12 years with your first round picks. How many of your first round picks are good players and still playing.
Many on here at the time were desperately hoping that we wouldn't pick Galluci.That’s ****ed, we picked the one dud
I've often wondered what would be a good way to measure recruiters ... it's not a level playing field but surely we can get an indication from the right stats?
Would something like the number of games / brownlow votes / finals for players drafted 1-10 / 11-20 etc... give an indication? Would have to be only players that are outside of academy / fs / nga ... or at least have the "special" cases separated?
I suppose the trading up / trading down count would tell a part of the story too?
Scorpus do you have this in a spreadsheet somewhere
How about the 2019 draft?Really? I had no idea.
I've often wondered what would be a good way to measure recruiters ... it's not a level playing field but surely we can get an indication from the right stats?
Would something like the number of games / brownlow votes / finals for players drafted 1-10 / 11-20 etc... give an indication? Would have to be only players that are outside of academy / fs / nga ... or at least have the "special" cases separated?
I suppose the trading up / trading down count would tell a part of the story too?
Scorpus do you have this in a spreadsheet somewhere
Obviously you're just having a go at Ogilvie but these criteria make no sense, and would imply that Lance Franklin was a bad draft pick, since Hawthorn could have picked a mid instead, increasing the number of mids picked in the last 12 years.I reckon simple measure is how many mids have you drafted in 12 years with your first round picks. How many of your first round picks are good players and still playing.
Carlton were 13th with 8 wins when Saad and Cerra went there.
7 wins when Williams went there.
Did I say you couldn’t pick a gun forward with a first round pick? Hawks had a decent midfield didn’t they?Obviously you're just having a go at Ogilvie but these criteria make no sense, and would imply that Lance Franklin was a bad draft pick, since Hawthorn could have picked a mid instead, increasing the number of mids picked in the last 12 years.
Team performance has to be the primary criteria, though looking at the range of hits vs misses with some weighting to earlier picks/overall player quality would get you somewhere.
Yeah - but ladder position doesn't just come down to the recruiters. Even the list can be pulled apart by a terrible culture and all your gems go to better options.Ladder position. Eventually everything comes down to that
He saw McHenry and Murphy and realised he would be playing SANFLHayward saw we are playing McHenry and Murphy this week and realised we are a long way from being a contender still.
We've sorely lacked in Forward Pressure since Charlie and Eddie left, Fog/Tex/TT aren't exactly pressure machines, Hayward applies it in spades
Would tend to agree with this. Besides, doesnt look like Hayward will leave now, particularly with a premiership a real possibility this year. Think we would be better going hard on LDU..North is one of the few clubs we can realistically say we are a better alternative to. Wouldnt be against also going after Luko..but only if he plays like he did Thursday night.Hayward is an average to good player and to me money isn’t the big issue but the length of the contract is. We should only be offering top line players 5 plus years, not players like him. Crows said they’d be aggressive, I hope they aren’t stupid.
McCluggage or DLU are 5 plus years contract players.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Hayward is an average to good player and to me money isn’t the big issue but the length of the contract is. We should only be offering top line players 5 plus years, not players like him. Crows said they’d be aggressive, I hope they aren’t stupid.
McCluggage or DLU are 5 plus years contract players.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
LDU under contract though, I can’t see North letting him go. If he leaves next year he will trigger rd 1 compo which is going to be a top 3 pickWould tend to agree with this. Besides, doesnt look like Hayward will leave now, particularly with a premiership a real possibility this year. Think we would be better going hard on LDU..North is one of the few clubs we can realistically say we are a better alternative to. Wouldnt be against also going after Luko..but only if he plays like he did Thursday night.
Surely he has a third cousin twice removed in regional SA and we can just play the same “family” card every Victorian club playsLDU under contract though, I can’t see North letting him go. If he leaves next year he will trigger rd 1 compo which is going to be a top 3 pick
I dunno..can we fail upwards by picking the wrong players in the draft and somehow still perform ok?Ladder position. Eventually everything comes down to that
Saad left Essendon at the end of 2020, who had just finished 13th at 6-1-10. Carlton finished 11th that year.Carlton were 13th with 8 wins when Saad and Cerra went there.
7 wins when Williams went there.
It's one you give to someone who doesn't have other strings to their bow, like a Petrenko or Murphy. Cameron may have started that way, but he quickly developed his skills beyond that and Betts defensive work was always his a part of his game, never the main or only feature.Forward pressure comes from players that get or just miss getting the ball. Assigning a role to 'create forward pressure' is only for morons.
But Adelaide costs of living (housing particularly) would be significantly lower than Sydney. The excess cash of the deal plus the savings in that "comfortable lifestyle" put the Adelaide offer miles ahead from a pure wealth creation view.Unless you are absolutely terrible with money, either number should set you up and give you a very comfortable lifestyle
If you're failing upwards while picking the wrong players the players you picked can't be that bad. At some point you must have selected the good players that are helping you win - you could obviously have poor drafting for a period of time or something.I dunno..can we fail upwards by picking the wrong players in the draft and somehow still perform ok?
So, McAsey and Gallucci were bad picks? Why hasn't anyone raised this until now?How about the 2019 draft?
After we took Fischer McAsey at pick 6.
Hayden Young
Caleb Serong
Liam Henry
Tom Green
Sam Flanders
Kysaiah Pickett
Will Day
Miles Bergman
Mitch Georgiades
Sam De Koning
Chad Warner