- Joined
- Sep 13, 2011
- Posts
- 9,668
- Reaction score
- 15,134
- Location
- The Riff
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Other Teams
- Raiders, Brumbies
CLUB 1
Hopper is from St Pats and it goes on and on.”
No, he's from Leeton. He joined the academy as a thirteen year old and continued doing academy stuff right through his 2 years at St Pats. His father is also on record as saying that the decision to send him to St Pats had nothing to do with Football and everything to do with the educational, and more importantly the spiritual/religious values of the school.
= Fail
Oh and Setterfield (and the school coaches) are in regular contact with the head academy coach Jason Saddington and he still does some academy stuff when he's not at school.
CLUB 2
“They (GWS) can get up to nine players (out of NSW) this year, which may be the equivalent to WA and SA’s draft talent combined.
Do they not teach maths in school any more? Seriously? 9 players. We don't have the list space or the points to take 9 players in a draft. And you know what that means? It means your club, or any other club for that matter, can get the kids for themselves.
=Fail
CLUB 3
“It’s a joke, it it’s embarrassing and very frustrating. They’ve got about 10 kids they (GWS) will get and there might be only six kids coming out of South Australia this year.
So 9 has become 10 and you argument looks even more stupid than it did with "club 2"
=Fail
CLUB 4
“They have heaps this year — and they’re guns. A few of them are A-graders, too — first-rounders.
“Macreadie, Setterfield ... they’re in a very, very good position. The depth of talent, geez.”
There are a couple of good ones, but they're hardly all top 10, in fact they're hardly all even first rounders. Hopper went 7 last year, none of them are as good as him, and certainly not all of them. You overestimate because it suits you to do so. Saw one draft watch list the other week that had only 2 of our kids in the top 30.
=Fail
CLUB 5
“The Giants have just rubbed it in everyone’s faces by doing so little work, putting in so little effort and then taking all the rewards.
650 kids across a dozen different centres with three full time and 50 part time coaches, fitness and support staff. Fortnightly training and skills sessions, injury rehab and recovery programs, etc. etc. Nowhere even close to "so little effort" that your post is becoming more pathetic by the "club"
=Fail
CLUB 6
“(Todd) Marshall was overseas playing cricket, comes home, starts playing footy, looks like an absolute star and they can just get him for nothing. It’s ridiculous.
Marshall hasn't spent enough time in the Academy to qualify. We don't have access to him through the system. He's in the open draft. We don't get him for nothing - we don't even get him for market rates. It's not just about geography, it's about development. Learn the facts before opening your mouth.
=Fail
CLUB 7
“They’re not putting enough into those kids because they know they’re natural football kids.
“All they have to do now is show development plans for them and in the past they didn’t even have to talk to them until their draft year.”
Just a pale rehash of "Club 5". And an ill informed one at that - most of these kids have been in the academy since they were 13 - hardly waiting to draft year to talk to them. And they don't just have to show development plans they have to implement them. And as for the past, there is ample evidence of development plans and constant contact even before it was all formalised into the rules. The rules have been updated to reflect the reality of what has happened for the past five years.
=Fail
So basically your post is rubbish - 0 from 7 - swing and a miss.
Last edited:








