- Apr 10, 2014
- 1,203
- 1,381
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
You can and need to play injured players. Walker was managing foot injuries for the best part of two years and made the AA squad during that time, despite not being at his best. I am sure that you are not suggesting that he shouldn't have been playing for that entire time. The key is to manage players so that the injuries don't get worse by playing. That might mean resting players at certain times, it might mean limiting training at other times. In some cases you will be trying to fix the injury, in other cases will being trying to manage the player through the season. Every player and every injury is different so it is understandable that sometimes the club gets it wrong and a player plays who in hindsight shouldn't have.Yeah OK, absolutely technically 100% is not the right term to use. Nobody is 100% fit ie as fit as they can be. More is always possible, but jeez, pedantic.
Re: Tex, I wasn't saying he should've been dropped for the GF. I was saying that his foot injury:
--- might have been better managed if he'd been rested earlier, and
--- (where we are in agreement) we have a better idea of how/where our depth players will play, now. IF Tex was unavailable for the GF, we'd probably play Fogarty (if uninjured) because he'll have some AFL under his belt by then and we know what we'll get out of him ie at least solid, contested effort.
As for his being "underdone", well, 15 goals in 5 games is very handy (even with a bad game against Collingwood), no complaints at all there. All players without a full pre-season or coming back from injury are underdone. Crouch was underdone last week. Betts will be underdone if he plays this week, too.
Underdone is not the same as uninjured.
I'm sure you'd agree we have to stop playing injured players, senior or not. Our (now proven) depth allows us that.





