Not true on AFL exposure how many AFL players drafted don't get to play 10 AFL games if anyExposure to the AFL is the only thing that will determine that and that comes down to development of our list, it’s been poor and we have so many players we don’t know about.
But of the player you mentioned.
Gallucci - bust, so far Hamish first mistake in first round but he wanted English anyway
Pohohkle- pick in the 40s. Showed more yesterday than he has in his previous games because he played in the middle, not up forward, a point Dunstall made.
Stengle- I reckon will, but we used a pick in the 60s on him, so not a big investment and odds making it would be low.
Murphy - rookie. Don’t like him up forward, wouldn’t mind him down back, the position he played in the sanfl where we upgraded him
Wilson- rookie. No.
So of the players you mentioned, only one was a decent pick and that was in the teens. Hamish hasn’t had a lot to work with and that’s where your consistent harping on about him falls down, you fail to take into account anything else about the state of our list besides Hamish. No mention of the picks we’ve lost, the players we couldn’t retain, the lack of quality picks, the s**t conservative selection philosophy and the club culture that strives for scraping into the 8 which breeds mediocrity.
The biggest success we have in drafting recently are the crouches and they are good players but not elite and as midfielders they are being compared to fyfe danger Selwood bonts pendles dusty cotchin as they are the top teams and who we have to beat to win a flag
Yes Rendell did draft danger but he left
On SM-G965F using BigFooty.com mobile app