Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Essentially, we used Brisbane’s first on Croft, and our 2023 and 2024 firsts on Sanders. Had we not made that trade, our best case scenario would be getting Darcy Wilson with our first and matching Croft with Brisbane’s first. Wilson, Croft, and our 2024 first in place would have been good.
Another possibility would be a team like Essendon spite bidding on Croft, we pay our first for him, and Brisbane’s first comes somewhere around pick 28. We end up with Croft, whatever midfielder we can find at that fairly barren stage of the draft , and our 2024 first rounder. Less good a deal.
i didn’t like the future first trade at the time. Let’s hope Sanders is worth it.
The bid for Croft came after pick 10, unless your saying someone would have bid on him earlier to force our hand which was certainly a possibility.This isn’t correct at all.
Picks 10 and 17 would have been swallowed up by the Croft bid.
In reality, we gave up the F1 at the time (this year’s pick) to jump up and pick Sanders.
Croft was bid at by Sydney at pick 15.This isn’t correct at all.
Picks 10 and 17 would have been swallowed up by the Croft bid.
In reality, we gave up the F1 at the time (this year’s pick) to jump up and pick Sanders.
Croft was bid at by Sydney at pick 15.
We would have given up pick 17. After Academy picks this blows out to 20.
Our pick 10 blows out to 12-13.
So we would have pick 12-13. Plus all our picks next year.
Am I reading this wrong ?
Bevo's last 8 games, 3 and 5 with an incredibly easy draw, this is clearly a bottom 4 team
lost to Hawks
lost to West Coast
beat Geelong (tanking with half a side in)
lost to Melbourne (belted)
beat Gold Coast
beat West Coast
lost to Geelong
lost to Bombers (injury hit)
But also no Sanders. Let's say we finish 12th, I guess that means we paid pick 12/13 (2023) and pick 7ish (2024) for him + some Croft points.Croft was bid at by Sydney at pick 15.
We would have given up pick 17. After Academy picks this blows out to 20.
Our pick 10 blows out to 12-13.
So we would have pick 12-13. Plus all our picks next year.
Am I reading this wrong ?
After bids etc it would be something like 12/13 (2023), 21 (2023) & 7 (2024) for Sanders & Croft.But also no Sanders. Let's say we finish 12th, I guess that means we paid pick 12/13 (2023) and pick 7ish (2024) for him + some Croft points.
Sanders ended up being pick 6. So we gave up pick 12 + pick 7(2024) for pick 6 (Sanders) in that scenario.But also no Sanders. Let's say we finish 12th, I guess that means we paid pick 12/13 (2023) and pick 7ish (2024) for him + some Croft points.
Sanders ended up being pick 6. So we gave up pick 12 + pick 7(2024) for pick 6 (Sanders) in that scenario.
On paper it doesn't look that good a deal.
Fake Tom Browne Twitter account said dogs board held crisis talks this morning with Beveridge maybe sacked this Monday.
Got excited even though it was Browne.... until I realised it was the fake one so even less likely than zero
I don’t include Melbourne in that list.Consistently good teams like Geelong, Melbourne, Collingwood for example have strong systems and belief in those systems.
When things are not going well, the majority of times it is them going away from those systems. They rarely change things, they merely go back and double down on executing their system.
We will not become a genuine top 4 challenger until we have systems that stand up under pressure that we can go back to if we go away from the system that we know works well and we trust.
There is a change in our system this year. Too early to just whether it is one that can stand up be trusted, we will not know this until the second half of the year and in the meantime it will be tweaked. The next 6 weeks are critical for our season in bedding down the system whilst winning games
Clarko, Bevo, Kingsley and even Chris Scott more or less came from nowhere to be appointed. I’d cast a wide net and keep a very open mind.Who are the next ones in line?
Port will get Carr.
Gia?
The Eagles will eventually get Cox.
Caracella?
Mcqualter?
Graham?
Are you the Tom Browne twitter profileMy intel as of 10 minutes ago is a board meeting has been called for early this week.
I don't even have twitter, but no lolAre you the Tom Browne twitter profile
I don't even have twitter, but no lol
Two, actually.It's one bad loss.
We are stuck with Beveridge until HE decides he wants to go
It's not looking quite so good now, with us a chance of finishing bottom four and facing a likely rebuild (which takes the urgency out of getting a good one in 2023).I mean if we don’t do this trade we don’t have Sanders.
We desperately needed a young midfielder and we got a good one by the looks of it.
I’d still do that trade at this point.