- Jul 11, 2007
- 10,821
- 82
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
In 2008 and so far this year, I honestly have no idea what suspensions may be given out for certain acts.
In my opinion, it has become far too unpredictable (acts could get anything from 0 to say a relatively high number of weeks), and inconsistent (how many times have you seen a player go for x weeks, where as another player got off or went for less, after doing a similar thing?).
I'm interested in your opinion.
From 2008 onwards, has the tribunal become too inconsistent, such that it is generally now unpredictable?
Over to you.
edit: and no this isn't a whinge based on my team's 4 reports this year, as in hindsight, I think fair enough on most of them. This thread comes as a result of reading thread after thread, week after week, regarding suspensions.
In my opinion, it has become far too unpredictable (acts could get anything from 0 to say a relatively high number of weeks), and inconsistent (how many times have you seen a player go for x weeks, where as another player got off or went for less, after doing a similar thing?).
I'm interested in your opinion.
From 2008 onwards, has the tribunal become too inconsistent, such that it is generally now unpredictable?
Over to you.
edit: and no this isn't a whinge based on my team's 4 reports this year, as in hindsight, I think fair enough on most of them. This thread comes as a result of reading thread after thread, week after week, regarding suspensions.