grizzlym
Premium Platinum
And the teams are out.
Preview Hawthorn vs Essendon - The Teams
- Thread starter grizzlym
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Jun 21, 2009
- 26,776
- 33,452
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Followers: Renouf, Hodge, Sewell
Interchange: Ellis, Muston, Skipper, Young
Emergencies: Peterson, Shiels, Whitecross
In: Bateman, Young
Out: Peterson (omitted), Whitecross (omitted)
Followers: Renouf, Hodge, Sewell
Interchange: Ellis, Muston, Skipper, Young
Emergencies: Peterson, Shiels, Whitecross
In: Bateman, Young
Out: Peterson (omitted), Whitecross (omitted)
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Hawthorn
B: Brent Guerra, Stephen Gilham, Thomas Murphy
HB: Grant Birchall, Ben Stratton, Rick Ladson
C: Jordan Lewis, Sam Mitchell, Chance Bateman
HF: Michael Osborne, Lance Franklin, Shaun Burgoyne
F: Cyril Rioli, Jarryd Roughead, Ryan Schoenmakers
Foll: Brent Renouf, Luke Hodge, Brad Sewell
I/C: Xavier Ellis, Beau Muston, Wayde Skipper, Clinton Young
Emg: Carl Peterson, Liam Shiels, Brendan Whitecross
In: Bateman, Young
Out: Brendan Whitecross, Carl Peterson
edit: sorry, team already posted
Hawthorn
B: Brent Guerra, Stephen Gilham, Thomas Murphy
HB: Grant Birchall, Ben Stratton, Rick Ladson
C: Jordan Lewis, Sam Mitchell, Chance Bateman
HF: Michael Osborne, Lance Franklin, Shaun Burgoyne
F: Cyril Rioli, Jarryd Roughead, Ryan Schoenmakers
Foll: Brent Renouf, Luke Hodge, Brad Sewell
I/C: Xavier Ellis, Beau Muston, Wayde Skipper, Clinton Young
Emg: Carl Peterson, Liam Shiels, Brendan Whitecross
In: Bateman, Young
Out: Brendan Whitecross, Carl Peterson
edit: sorry, team already posted
- Jun 21, 2009
- 26,776
- 33,452
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Peterson VERY VERY unlucky
Peterson VERY VERY unlucky
Cyril the Squirrel
All Australian
- Mar 26, 2009
- 774
- 638
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
WTF? Why is Peterson out?
WTF? Why is Peterson out?
- Jun 21, 2009
- 26,776
- 33,452
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Schoenmakers taken Peterson's spot. We need pace and we go with a slower tall defender up forward.
He was really bad last time against the Bombers, so maybe they remembered that.
Schoenmakers taken Peterson's spot. We need pace and we go with a slower tall defender up forward.
He was really bad last time against the Bombers, so maybe they remembered that.
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
maybe Young will not play and Chubbs will come in??
maybe Young will not play and Chubbs will come in??
georgetown2
Draftee
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
unlucky for CP but the team is now looking very solid!!
unlucky for CP but the team is now looking very solid!!
- Jun 21, 2009
- 26,776
- 33,452
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
This.
I just thought about it and Youngy is obviously not going to come up.
This.
I just thought about it and Youngy is obviously not going to come up.
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Add Gibson & Browny in there and we are at 100%
Petersen is unlucky but someone had to get dropped!!, and Bateman should be put on notice!
Best looking team on paper so far in 2010
Add Gibson & Browny in there and we are at 100%
Petersen is unlucky but someone had to get dropped!!, and Bateman should be put on notice!
Best looking team on paper so far in 2010
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
They must have a role designated for Ryan Schoenmakers against the Bombers. I can't think of any other reason he'd be kept in ahead of Peterson. He hasn't impressed me at all this year.
They must have a role designated for Ryan Schoenmakers against the Bombers. I can't think of any other reason he'd be kept in ahead of Peterson. He hasn't impressed me at all this year.
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Peterson and Whitecross both kick there 2&3 goals every week and apply forward pressure..................CP should not have been omitted he offers an X factor up forward for us.
Peterson and Whitecross both kick there 2&3 goals every week and apply forward pressure..................CP should not have been omitted he offers an X factor up forward for us.
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Not sure i like that either, but gues some one has to go, Bit worried about Shoemakers playing againts the Bombers i remember him turning it over at crucial stages againts them last game, Is it posible to keep both Young and Peterson and Drop Shoey?
Not sure i like that either, but gues some one has to go, Bit worried about Shoemakers playing againts the Bombers i remember him turning it over at crucial stages againts them last game, Is it posible to keep both Young and Peterson and Drop Shoey?
- Jun 21, 2009
- 26,776
- 33,452
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Depending on weather, they'll probably twist Schoey's ankle late tomorrow and bring Peterson in.
Depending on weather, they'll probably twist Schoey's ankle late tomorrow and bring Peterson in.
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
maybe the wanted the height md? not sure....the scum selections were a bit bewildering as well...drop 3 defenders and bring up 3 defenders
maybe the wanted the height md? not sure....the scum selections were a bit bewildering as well...drop 3 defenders and bring up 3 defenders
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Dont like the twisted ankle part but like the Peterson in Shoey out part, He really hasnt impressed me this year, last year he looked the part but seems to be turning it over as much if not more the Murphy.
Dont like the twisted ankle part but like the Peterson in Shoey out part, He really hasnt impressed me this year, last year he looked the part but seems to be turning it over as much if not more the Murphy.
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
I just looked up at the last team we fielded againts the Scum and no Peterson?
Why dont they like playing him againts the Scum?
I just looked up at the last team we fielded againts the Scum and no Peterson?
Why dont they like playing him againts the Scum?
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
I can not understand the reasoning behind keeping Schoey and dropping Peterson.
Surely Peterson would have a lot more to offer than Schoey does on a cold wet Melbourne night??
I can not understand the reasoning behind keeping Schoey and dropping Peterson.
Surely Peterson would have a lot more to offer than Schoey does on a cold wet Melbourne night??
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Regardless of changes, on paper we should smash them!!!
Regardless of changes, on paper we should smash them!!!
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Schoenmakers did a pretty good job on Taylor Walker last week, perhaps we're mindful of having decent cover for Hurley and Gumby while still being able to cover their ruckmen resting forward.
And has Peterson been a bit quiet the last few weeks? Perhaps just a rest for him. Although I agree it's concerning we've dropped a couple of guys who bag a few goals each week.
Schoenmakers did a pretty good job on Taylor Walker last week, perhaps we're mindful of having decent cover for Hurley and Gumby while still being able to cover their ruckmen resting forward.
And has Peterson been a bit quiet the last few weeks? Perhaps just a rest for him. Although I agree it's concerning we've dropped a couple of guys who bag a few goals each week.
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
very very tough on peterson...
but i'm happy to give beau muston some more time... so yeah... i guess the ins are pretty big too... but... it does hurt our forward line a bit
very very tough on peterson...
but i'm happy to give beau muston some more time... so yeah... i guess the ins are pretty big too... but... it does hurt our forward line a bit
spudmaster
Brownlow Medallist
Re: Hawks vs Dons - Changes and Discussion Here
Re Peterson:
My guess is that it's to do with the fast paced gamestyle that the bombers play and peterson isn't the best endurance player just yet.
Further, he will get a rest occasionally as we have already seen, and resting him this week gives him effectively a 3 week break (adelaide match - bulldogs match) and will assist him in being well rested and hopefully right to play a number of consecutive matches against top notch sides after the break.
Re Peterson:
My guess is that it's to do with the fast paced gamestyle that the bombers play and peterson isn't the best endurance player just yet.
Further, he will get a rest occasionally as we have already seen, and resting him this week gives him effectively a 3 week break (adelaide match - bulldogs match) and will assist him in being well rested and hopefully right to play a number of consecutive matches against top notch sides after the break.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Sticky
