HoneyBadger35
The Big Kahuna
- Aug 11, 2011
- 26,526
- 72,152
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Moderator
- #676
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The B sample won't play into it as the inference is not one of a "positive drug test". The inference is the tampering of a sample, doesn't matter if it's A or B. They are separate issues
Almost certainty spat into the cup, no doubt accidentally but it's enough to for them to report it. You only two goes at giving a test, both have to be free of anything. Spit included
Is this like having a fake willy to put clean pee in the cup?
Oh ok, I guess in that case we would expect similar results.Decant from one jar to another. (Split the sample)
Oh ok, I guess in that case we would expect similar results.
I usually don't care who posts on our board but I just checked out some of the drivel you have been spreading over on your board.
So it gives me great pleasure to extend the same hospitalities as your own board to our posters to say fu** Off Back To Your Hole You Wierd campaigner.......
How did they even let him have that in his hand? I just dont get it they lock you down.Herald Sun just posted this article......View attachment 744964
Herald Sun just posted this article......View attachment 744964
Herald Sun just posted this article......View attachment 744964
The whole thing makes no sense
So he isn't a drug cheat at least that much is clear as of the info we have right now
The inference is that a liquid from a drink got into drug sample during or after testing.
The ASADA tester would have been right there watching him, theres just no possible way anything could have gone into the sample from Willie if they are monitoring it. The whole thing is absolutley bizzare
Either he accidentally spat into the cup, or he's somehow poured something in it, or perhaps even something added afterwards during transit or even testing, contamination?
Very strange.
Unless it all hangs on the B sample but i would have thought that trying to alter the sample is an immediate ban?You'd think that they would just ban him on the spot then surely. Bit of a s**t system if they let something like that slide for several weeks while still allowing him to play.
Oh well he is done ...no getting off really unless the second B sample is clear ,
Herald Sun just posted this article......View attachment 744964
I am betting its clear of beverages.
And clear of performance enhancing drugs.
Herald Sun just posted this article......View attachment 744964
If he was then forced to provide a legitimate sample then surely he knew then he was in trouble, and he hasn't looked like that the last couple of weeks. Also, wouldn't ASADA have punished at the time?Herald Sun just posted this article......View attachment 744964
Spilt some Gatorade in it.