Current Julian Assange arrested. * Priti Patel approves US extradition 17/6/2022

[petedavo]

Swedish prosecutor applies to Court for an arrest warrant to begin extradition request

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[sprockets]

https://www.news.com.au/world/break...s/news-story/d0b581126c59c6cf1cbd20f36249ecf4

"WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has suffered psychological torture from a defamation campaign and should not be extradited to the United States where he would face a "politicised show trial", a UN human rights investigator says. ..."

I wonder if he'd be suffering from that if he faced up to his alleged sins.

 

[Procrastinator35]

https://www.news.com.au/world/break...s/news-story/d0b581126c59c6cf1cbd20f36249ecf4

"WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has suffered psychological torture from a defamation campaign and should not be extradited to the United States where he would face a "politicised show trial", a UN human rights investigator says. ..."

I wonder if he'd be suffering from that if he faced up to his alleged sins.

7 years of incarceration; & all for exposing our western establishment for the criminal rat-bags that they are.....And you still don't get it.

 

[HTPunter]

This bit is interesting and possibly at the heart of the problem.

"Assange in an August 2010 interview called it "regrettable" sources disclosed by WikiLeaks could be harmed, but said WikiLeaks was "not obligated to protect other people's sources," according to the indictment."

https://www.news.com.au/world/break...s/news-story/9e0a327a249111345507735b3788b07c

The problem is he's supposedly an ally of the US given he's an Aussie (was he living in the US at the time?). He may not have a legal obligation (he may) but surely he has a moral one. It's kind of like saying "That girl across the road was being beaten but I had no obligation to help her because she's someone else's child".

If you believe in the Aussie/US way of life you have an obligation to abide by its rules. If you don't believe then you're the enemy.

I'm not going to pretend to know the Assange situation itself in and out, but in general, the Aussie/US way of life should surely be transparent governments...which we clearly don't have in the wake of Afghanistan/Iraq etc. If wanting corrupt officials exposed means I don't believe in the 'Aussie' way of life, then so be it.

 

[HTPunter]

Here are some interesting articles.

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/...schilds-groomed-assange-as-a-bankster-hitman/

Although Wikileaks may now be separated from Julian Assange, this claims Wikileaks was used in 2011 as a Rothschild operation to discredit their Swiss banking rival, after JA was groomed from 2008 when Wikileaks was awarded The Economist’s New Media Award.

The Rothschilds began grooming Julian Assange in 2008, when Wikileaks was awarded The Economist’s New Media Award. The Economist is the voice of Britain’s establishment (led by the British Rothschilds) which has, for example, on balance, supported Britain’s involvement in the Iraq war. Sir Evelyn Robert Adrian de Rothschild was chairman of The Economist from 1972 to 1989. His wife Lynn Forester de Rothschild currently sits on The Economist’s board. The Rothschild family also has a large shareholder interest in The Economist.

At first blush, it is incredulous that the The Economist, the pinnacle of the establishment, would give their award to Assange knowing full well that he was releasing classified government documents and being overly aware of the havoc this will create in the world. The Rothschilds’ oft- stated goal (over the centuries) is for a One World Government (i.e. The New World Order). To this end they engineer conflict between nations, to create crises that will then be utilized to increase the power of international entities – the UN, World Bank, IMF, etc. For example, they (and other closely-related families like the Schiffs) financed the Bolsheviks. In the past, the Rothschild empire have profited by bankrolling both sides of war.

US senator Joe Lieberman is the Rothschild’s point man in America. During the last presidential election, he took his friend, Republican candidate John McCain to Jacob Rothschild’s house for a fund-raiser for McCain. Lieberman is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (a Rothschild cabal which is essentially the shadow government of the US). Lieberman’s recent actions resulted in cutting off the money supply of Wikileaks: Paypal, Mastercard, Visa, stopped accepting donations for Wikileaks. Lieberman publicly took credit for censoring Wikileaks’ website by pressuring Amazon to stop hosting the website. The result was that Anonymous hactivists launched attacks on the websites of companies (above) which had discontinued service to Wikileaks. Lieberman’s campaign against Wikileaks had the effect of increasing the martyrdom and hence the popularity of Assange and Wikileaks. Lieberman made Assange a star, nearly becoming Time magazine’s Man of The Year.

Julian Assange’s lawyer is Mark Stephens of Finers Stephens Innocent, a major London elite law firm. They are the legal adviser to the Rothschild’s prestigious Waddesdon Trust.

Assange’s main media partner is The Guardian. The Guardian has been infiltrated by Rothschilds. The Guardian is controlled by Guardian Media Group whose chairman is Paul Myners a past employee of N. M. Rothschild Limited & Sons Limited. Guardian Media Group is owned by Scott Trust which became a limited private company in 2008 with all trustees becoming directors of the Scott Trust. Anthony Salz was appointed as a trustee of Scott Trust in 2009: He is currently executive vice-chairman of the investment Bank Rothschild.

The Guardian gave the US cables to the current New York Times. The chairman of the NYT is Arthur Sulzberger Jr., a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is the son of Arthur Ochs Sulzberger and grandson of Arthur Hays Sulzberger who served as a Trustee for the Rockefeller Foundation (in cahoots with Rothschilds for One World Government).

After a time in a real prison, Assange was “imprisoned” in a countryside mansion at the home of Vaughan Smith, the owner of Frontline Trust, a news organization that seeks to influence TV journalists. Frontline is funded by George Soros’ organization, Open Society Institute, and George Soros is intimately intertwined with the Rothschilds. George Soros has been a frequent business partner with James Goldsmith (father of Jemima Khan and cousin of the Rothschilds). The director of Soros’ Open Society Institute, Richard Katz was director of N M Rothschild & Sons for 16 years. Other board members like Nils Taube also hold positions in Rothschild banks, etcetera. On October 25 and July 27 this year, Assange was a speaker at Vaughan Smith’s Frontline Trust.

Very little trust in that article I'll be honest.

 

[BlueE]

Very little trust in that article I'll be honest.

I'm sitting on the fence to see how this develops and like to consider all that's being written. The ownerships of the news papers mentioned does check out but it's possible JA and wikileaks aren't connected now as they were.

However its concerning that reports are saying JA has been moved to the hospital wing of the Belmarsh prison in the UK, and its unclear what's wrong with him, but it sounds serious.

 

[BlueE]

It also may be of interest to the Assange case that the US Office of Inspector General Finds Top FBI Official Illegally Leaked to Media – Including Sensitive Info Sealed by Fed Courts – DOJ DECLINES PROSECUTION!

https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2019/f190529.pdf

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ealed-by-fed-courts-doj-declines-prosecution/

 

[sprockets]

I'm not going to pretend to know the Assange situation itself in and out, but in general, the Aussie/US way of life should surely be transparent governments...which we clearly don't have in the wake of Afghanistan/Iraq etc. If wanting corrupt officials exposed means I don't believe in the 'Aussie' way of life, then so be it.

We don't need to know every little detail though, for stated reasons. Is 'our side' guilty of war crimes? We ALL know it is, but so is the other side. Is Assange publishing as much info about them as he is about us and putting lives of the enemy at risk by doing so, or is most of the published stuff simply aimed at 'our side'?

 

[Kurve]

We don't need to know every little detail though, for stated reasons. Is 'our side' guilty of war crimes? We ALL know it is, but so is the other side. Is Assange publishing as much info about them as he is about us and putting lives of the enemy at risk by doing so, or is most of the published stuff simply aimed at 'our side'?

I think it's just that the biggest cache he got that was authentic happened to come from 'our side'.

On media and propaganda.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Here is the 4 corners episode on the sexual assault allegations against Assange .
She did not seem to disturbed with him the day after the event. You do wonder if the girls have been convinced they were wronged.

https://www.abc.net.au/4corners/sex-lies-and-julian-assange/4156420

 

[Procrastinator35]

Just an interesting little aside, by the by....Assange's call-name on the part of the criminal elite is 'Spartacus'.....Make of that what you will.

 

[sprockets]

I think it's just that the biggest cache he got that was authentic happened to come from 'our side'.

On media and propaganda.

Calls himself a journalist and Wikileaks media yet says the media can't be trusted...

EDIT: Do you think it's ok to just publish one side of the argument then?

 

[sprockets]

Here is the 4 corners episode on the sexual assault allegations against Assange .
She did not seem to disturbed with him the day after the event. You do wonder if the girls have been convinced they were wronged.

https://www.abc.net.au/4corners/sex-lies-and-julian-assange/4156420

Nice to see 4 Corners gave equal time to the 'other side' in the debate... Absolute rubbish from them as usual.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Nice to see 4 Corners gave equal time to the 'other side' in the debate... Absolute rubbish from them as usual.

Nice to see that 4 corners did allow the 2 girls lawyer to respond.

 

[Kurve]

Here is the 4 corners episode on the sexual assault allegations against Assange .
She did not seem to disturbed with him the day after the event. You do wonder if the girls have been convinced they were wronged.

https://www.abc.net.au/4corners/sex-lies-and-julian-assange/4156420

We're conditioned to not question allegations of sexual assault and in most circumstances of course we don't but there just might be something else going on here so I agree, this is not clear cut by any means. IMO.

 

[petedavo]

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[petedavo]

How being extradited to Sweden, might well thwart any chance of being extradited to the USA.

https://spinninghugo.wordpress.com/2019/04/12/assange-extradition-and-human-rights

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[petedavo]

The District Court in Upsala, Sweden has decided against issuing an Arrest Warrant.
It believes that Mr Assange will cooperate with the Swedish investigators of his own volition.

"Swedish court rejects request to detain Julian Assange over suspected rape case" https://twitter.com/i/events/1135552990125838341


Statement from the Prosecutor below


Statement from the Lawyer for the complainant below


Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[petedavo]

Court Decision Published

http://www.uppsalatingsratt.domstol...tion-for-a-detention-order-in-Case-B-3167-19/

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[petedavo]

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[Iworkthecircus]

I read mr a is in hospital unable to speak anyone else read this ?

 

[petedavo]

I read mr a is in hospital unable to speak anyone else read this ?

This is where the story originated from.
https://mobil.unt.se/nyheter/uppsala/advokaten-assange-intagen-pa-sjukavdelning-5319198.aspx

Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk

 

[sprockets]

I read mr a is in hospital unable to speak anyone else read this ?

Doing an Alan Bond?

 

[Kurve]

The AFP are raiding the home of News Corp Australia journalist Annika Smethurst over a story about a secret government plan to spy on Australians. The story went to press last year and the govt at the time declined to comment, three weeks after the election she's raided.

Journalists in Australia might now be a bit more sympathetic to Assange's plight but he can probably expect no help from our government.

The story, published in April 2018, said the Defence and Home Affairs ministries were discussing radical new espionage powers that would see Australia’s cyber spy agency, the Australian Signals Directorate, monitor Australian citizens for the first time.

Under the plan, emails, bank accounts and text messages of Australians could be secretly accessed by digital spies without a trace, provided the Defence and Home Affairs ministers approved.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/f...lFlow&utm_medium=Twitter&utm_source=HeraldSun

“Police will allege the unauthorised disclosure of these specific documents undermines Australia’s national security ..."

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/n...y/news-story/f42c2e9ab7e1269503428deb6a5f668f

 

[sprockets]

The AFP are raiding the home of News Corp Australia journalist Annika Smethurst over a story about a secret government plan to spy on Australians. The story went to press last year and the govt at the time declined to comment, three weeks after the election she's raided.

Journalists in Australia might now be a bit more sympathetic to Assange's plight but he can probably expect no help from our government.

The story, published in April 2018, said the Defence and Home Affairs ministries were discussing radical new espionage powers that would see Australia’s cyber spy agency, the Australian Signals Directorate, monitor Australian citizens for the first time.

Under the plan, emails, bank accounts and text messages of Australians could be secretly accessed by digital spies without a trace, provided the Defence and Home Affairs ministers approved.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/f...lFlow&utm_medium=Twitter&utm_source=HeraldSun

“Police will allege the unauthorised disclosure of these specific documents undermines Australia’s national security ..."

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/n...y/news-story/f42c2e9ab7e1269503428deb6a5f668f

In other words it's normal for governments to take action against people who publish secret government info.