Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If only the club was established a year earlier...we could've been the 69ers.Unpopular opinion time - 1870 by itself is not a logo. Establishment dates are good as a part of something bigger but not as the main focal point.
And the Birkenhead Bridge.The lighthouse.
What if 1870 was swapped with "PAFC" and right above or below it in the black area you have a small "1870" in white?
If only the club was established a year earlier...we could've been the 69ers.
If nothing else, the lines of the diamond are a pretty good representation of how we move the ball around the field when in possession of it.Doesn't really do it for me tbh. Just looks a bit basic and the diamond is a kind of obscure reference which we haven't seen before.
Agree with this.The unique part of our identity is the word PORT. I'd like to see that word used as the main part of the logo with a small amount of teal and possibly the prison bars in there somewhere. You see the word PORT, you know exactly who it means.
View attachment 674792
Unpopular opinion time - 1870 by itself is not a logo. Establishment dates are good as a part of something bigger but not as the main focal point.
If you were starting a new football team in Port Adelaide, it had never had one, what would be the image that represents the Port today?
Why? Is Jack Watts designing it?anyone else legitimately worried about this. could go **** up quite easily!
Why? Is Jack Watts designing it?
I understand the admin sucks, but the logo of 2 logos put together is only a short term thing. We need a singular logo that represents the whole club.
Port Adelaide is stronger than Port IMO.Agree with this.
As an SA expat living in Melbourne, I've noticed the change from our early AFL days.
In the beginning, I used to have to tell people I support Port Adelaide. Now, you just have to say Port and everyone knows what you mean. The word/name Port was always a great brand by itself and now it's an established part of the national football consciousness.
It's one of the few advantages we have - we should push it hard.
Yes YESS YESS
PORD ADELAIDE BUCANEERS!!!!!
Yes YESS YESS
PORD ADELAIDE BUCANEERS!!!!!
Port Adelaide is stronger than Port IMO.
If you say you go for Port, do you get the you support Port Power back from them?
I hate that we had to run with Port Power for 3 years to differentiate ourselves from Port Magpies. Both should have been Port Adelaide. In the AFL we should have been Port Adelaide or just Port, but not Port Power. But nobody in the history of a national sporting competition in the world that I'm aware of was forced to split into 2 and go thru the his BS, so we learnt on the job and made a few errors in the early days.