- Thread starter
- #8,001
Well when Player A has outperformed Player B in every season over the past 3 seasons, it's a decent stretch to argue that Player B has been better.Oh it's "only because" of that - yes, in your objective and unbiased opinion. People couldn't simply rate Bontempelli's body of work at the same level or higher. I'll have to trust the most one-eyed Collingwood supporter on the site's appraisal of that.
Instead of the giant whinge and deflection above, you could simply argue Daicos' case in a fair manner and accept alternative opinions supported by their own facts. It shouldn't deeply offend you when people point out the level any other peer has been at. It doesn't mean anybody is saying your boy is shit.
Of course Bontempelli's 'body of work' is higher - he's been on the scene for three times as long. But it doesn't change the fact his past 3 seasons have been inferior to Daicos.







