Q&A 2022

[Gough]

Sisonke Msimang’s defence of Winnie Mandela tonight is a disgrace. Basically shrugged off her atrocities because “oThEr PeOpLe WeRe KiLlInG tOo” and said the murders and violation of human rights shouldn’t define her.

What an absolute disgrace of a panelist.

Winners write history. Its the mechanism by which Churchill didn't have his neck stretched. Nobody says it's right.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

funny thing is the same peopme who will be lauding her would be the same who would be out to get someone like neil erickson if he made similar comments.

Go and donate to one of Erikson's gofundmes.

 

[Fagan Pride]

Cmon now. All you can show is a deep desire to not see black woman in political discussions.

She has acknowledged that Winnie has endorsed violence and needs to be held accountable, but she doesn't want scumbags like De Clerk to be lionised.

Barnsey acknowledged he's a socialist tonight. Have a crack at him. No?

No. If she didn’t acknowledge the killings it’d be a bit like when you’re faced with facts that don’t suit your narrative and you choose not to acknowledge them. Pretty hard not for her not to acknowledge them without looking like a delusional fool.

Every time she was asked to make comment on the atrocities Winnie committed, she attempted to deflect by pointing out the actions of others in that period. She then suggested that none of her atrocities she was responsible for should define her.

Disgusting.

 

[Socrates2]

you bitch about him abusing people and you call him a dolt...

What's that mate? Timmy, where are you? It's against the rules to misquote someone.

 

[Socrates2]

No. If she didn’t acknowledge the killings it’d be a bit like when you’re faced with facts that don’t suit your narrative and you choose not to acknowledge them. Pretty hard not for her not to acknowledge them without looking like a delusional fool.

Every time she was asked to make comment on the atrocities Winnie committed, she attempted to deflect by pointing out the actions of others in that period. She then suggested that none of her atrocities she was responsible for should define her.

Disgusting.

Your obsessed with hatred. Do you have a girlfriend?

 

[Fagan Pride]

Your obsessed with hatred. Do you have a girlfriend?

Are you hitting on me? I don’t swing that way.

 

[Socrates2]

Are you hitting on me? I don’t swing that way.

No, I was just tipping you don't. If your nice to them they might go out with you.

 

[Fagan Pride]

No, I was just tipping you don't. If your nice to them they might go out with you.

Thanks for the sound advice Casanova. But I’m quite content being single.

 

[FredLeDeux]

Thanks for the sound advice Casanova. But I’m quite content being single.

You're happy, the human race is happy, win win.

 

[Fagan Pride]

You're happy, the human race is happy, win win.

Female demographic in particular are ecstatic too given my availability. 7’s and above though.
I’ll leave the battlers for yourself and sookrates.

 

[GoldenSky]

Why is the people’s panelists almost always a person of colour and more often than not a female too?

Yep. Everything is given a left-wing identity politics slant on this show.

Much better for your health just to switch off, as most normal people in Australia now have - I don't consider Q&A to have been a "thing" since like 2013 or something. Just far-left trash these days.

In the last 7 months of watching, 6 of the last 7 people’s panelists have been women of colour. But yeah, it’s just a bunch of racist feels that I’ve plucked out of my ass


29OCT18 - Nakiah Lui
26NOV18 - Yasmin Poole
03DEC18 - Martin Mathews
10DEC18 - No people’s panelist
04FEB19 - No people’s panelist
11FEB19 - Zola Patel
18FEB19 - No people’s panelist
25FEB19 - No people’s panelist
04MAR19 - No people’s panelist
11MAR19 - No people’s panelist
18MAR19 - No people’s panelist
25MAR19 - No people’s panelist
01APR19 - Lakshmi Logathassan
08APR19 - No people’s panelist
15APR19 - No people’s panelist
29APR19 - No people’s panelist
06MAY19 - No people’s panelist
13MAY19 - No people’s panelist
20MAY19 - No people’s panelist
27MAY19 - Rachael Jacobs
03JUN19 - Sisonke Msimang

Haha, how embarrassing for Soft Downhill Skier, being so comprehensively proved wrong in this instance.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Yep. Everything is given a left-wing identity politics slant on this show.

Much better for your health just to switch off, as most normal people in Australia now have - I don't consider Q&A to have been a "thing" since like 2013 or something. Just far-left trash these days.




Haha, how embarrassing for Soft Downhill Skier, being so comprehensively proved wrong in this instance.

Aren’t you the one who thinks having an indigenous focus on news stories is pandering?

 

[TimmeT]

Aren’t you the one who thinks having an indigenous focus on news stories is pandering?

gets shown to be wrong so attacks the user.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

gets shown to be wrong so attacks the user.

Stop playing the man timme.

Do you have any data about over representation of black women in Australian media?

Because the last few arguments of overrepresentation have focused on black women. It’s racist identity politics.

 

[its free real estate]

Winners write history. Its the mechanism by which Churchill didn't have his neck stretched. Nobody says it's right.

Ragnar Redbeard did.

 

[TimmeT]

Stop playing the man timme.

Do you have any data about over representation of black women in Australian media?

Because the last few arguments of overrepresentation have focused on black women. It’s racist identity politics.

lol i had posted a fact while you had just attacked a user.

you seem very focused on using the clearly emotive line about racist identity politics rather than looking at the facts posted by Fagan Pride

 

[HairyO]

Why, because 6 out of hundreds of panelists are non-white women?

You have no concern when white men are over-represented. It's identity politics you're playing.

Wait. Are you saying the ABC are only putting women of colour on the show when they are selected as People's panellists, and no women of colour ever get chosen otherwise?

Sounds like we need an investigation !

 

[HairyO]

Winners write history. Its the mechanism by which Churchill didn't have his neck stretched. Nobody says it's right.

Winners write the history. Then decades or centuries later left wing academics rewrite the bits they dont like.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

lol i had posted a fact while you had just attacked a user.

you seem very focused on using the clearly emotive line about racist identity politics rather than looking at the facts posted by Fagan Pride

What fact did you post?

Yes that poster is offering only conservative identity politics. His last 3 complaints are focused on non white women being featured in the show.

 

[Gough]

Winners write the history. Then decades or centuries later left wing academics rewrite the bits they dont like.

I'm not sure the real history of the Anzacs would have been quite as compelling and nation defining as the version we've been force fed.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

I'm not sure the real history of the Anzacs would have been quite as compelling and nation defining as the version we've been force fed.

It’s very different.

 

[HairyO]

I'm not sure the real history of the Anzacs would have been quite as compelling and nation defining as the version we've been force fed.

Im not sure the version you have read has been absorbed and understood, given your propensity to leap at shadows.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Anzac stuff should probably go in the PC is a scourge thread.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[TimmeT]

What fact did you post?

Yes that poster is offering only conservative identity politics. His last 3 complaints are focused on non white women being featured in the show.

The fact that you were playing the man.

 

[Fagan Pride]

I'm not sure the real history of the Anzacs would have been quite as compelling and nation defining as the version we've been force fed.

Well duh. If we had have lost the world wars, we’d be speaking German, or Japanese, and celebrating the brave final assault of Kokoda where we squashed the enemy and pushed on to claiming Australia as rightfully ours.

Irrespective of if you hate your country or not. Some of the most defining and compelling moments regarding the ANZACS came when we got our arses handed to us. Sort of goes against your fanciful leftist theory of being the beneficiary of winning, and able to tell the tale whichever way we like.

The radical left will do anything to tear its country down. Even if it means attacking national treasure.