
Missing a D.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Carlton v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Lions at 64% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
Supercoach Rd 18 Rd18 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - BigFooty Cup – Round 2 - Last Coach Standing ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 18 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Bye Round Summary ,//, AFLW Fantasy 2025!
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Missing a D.
Jeff and Bicks seem to have morphed into the same person.Do you know why I disliked your post? It's because you come on after wins and act like an obnoxious little fanboi. The poster you were belittling had gone to the effort of providing his thoughts in a comprehensive post, and you use words like "moronic" to counter it.
Did it occur to you that the game may not have been close if Ranks and co didn't get torched in the midfield? Sure, his class up forward in the last was elite, but he struggled (again) defensively all night with a top class midfield opponent.
It's hardly moronic to point that out. One might say it's simple-minded (ie moronic) to have such a one dimensional view as yours.
I beg your pardon?Jeff and Bicks seem to have morphed into the same person.
His TOG was 69% and 64% in the past few weeks so it isn't due to him having less rotation because of a tall forward line.Anybody suggested that our tall forward line might be a contributing factor in mids like Soli looking pretty buggered?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I can just see Nicks going "WHOA, I hadn't thought of that!"
''Ok great idea - take down the '' try not to lose '' sign ''I can just see Nicks going "WHOA, I hadn't thought of that!"
Nicks: "We probably dodged a few bullets... but when we had our chances, we took them."
Probably his most accurate, succinct appraisal of a game ever. Usually speaks in lengthy gibberish
We tried to lose it... but Port weren't good enough to win.The somewhat more accurate version would be to say that we didn't win that game, Port lost it.
We tried to lose it... but Port weren't good enough to win.
Actually, that needs re-phrasing too. The coaching staff tried to lose the game, but Port weren't good enough to win. The players, with the possible exception of Laird, were actually trying to win - contrary to the intent of the coaches' instructions.
At the end of each season, each club should release an explainer for the signs of that year.Maybe "T-bicep" means "think of the draft pick we're losing if we win!"
The Crows walk off having somehow won, to the glares of Ogilvie and Reid.
How about a sign with a fly...We should have a poop emoji sign.
She’s got it upside down NIM
I thought at the time it meant Team Strong DefenceI interpreted T-strong
I felt similar.Just on this, I've heard a bunch of commentary around how it was a "fantastic" game, or a "real showcase" of footy. Obviously, it was close and still alive as a contest until the very end, which helps. And there were a couple of big moments, such as Rankine's goal or Keane's mark. But my impression on the night was that it was a pretty poor contest overall. Is that just me being a grumpy supporter and wanting a better showing?
I noticed in the commentary they said we had something like only 6x interchanges left with 10 min to go.we had energy/adrenalin and best of all, momentum. Why not ride that wave to a 6 or 7 goal win??
Telling them to slow down, protect the lead, chip-chip etc and nearly get done was wasteful and anti-climactic.
I felt flat after the game; still feel pissed off that PA nearly stole the win.
Pretty sure we had more interchanges left than port though.I noticed in the commentary they said we had something like only 6x interchanges left with 10 min to go.
I don't agree with it, but I can't help thinking that may have been a possible reason we tried to shut up shop early. I was also pissed off with how the game panned out, but thinking back to the game against the Roos, I was looking over to the benches in the last quarter after seeing how many times we had made our changes up to then and thinking, how many do we have left? It can't be that many? (and it wasn't, which was why Fog was basically left out there to run himself into the ground).
I'm not sure if it's a deliberate gamble that we are taking? It almost (should have) cost us the game, even after that massive surge after Berry came on, and that burst for what ended up (luckily) being the winning lead.
Interesting.I noticed in the commentary they said we had something like only 6x interchanges left with 10 min to go.
I don't agree with it, but I can't help thinking that may have been a possible reason we tried to shut up shop early. I was also pissed off with how the game panned out, but thinking back to the game against the Roos, I was looking over to the benches in the last quarter after seeing how many times we had made our changes up to then and thinking, how many do we have left? It can't be that many? (and it wasn't, which was why Fog was basically left out there to run himself into the ground).
I'm not sure if it's a deliberate gamble that we are taking? It almost (should have) cost us the game, even after that massive surge after Berry came on, and that burst for what ended up (luckily) being the winning lead.
Yeah, I think they only had two left.Pretty sure we had more interchanges left than port though.