Media Season 27 All-SFA Extended Squad

[DERO]

Barrybran is arranging a casting couch.

 

[Tigerturbulance]

Barrybran is arranging a casting couch.

can I be the couch

 

[JT_the_Man]

I'm an automatic selection

Nah that’s me.

#jtforallsfa

 

[GotTheGoodes]

Ripped off.

 

[philreich]

No philreich?

Farce.

I'd rather win a flag anyway!!!

 

[philreich]

Incorrect. It is a highly complex decision making matrix!


View attachment 698711


Summary 1 the commission has made a final rule changing the way that levels of performance are negotiated for decisions connecting to the All Sweet FA selection system, and improving the technical requirements for new team selection. the changes enhance the rules to reflect the changing needs of the All Sweet FA selection system with the objective of maintaining All Sweet FA selection system security and quality of player supply at the lowest cost to consumers. the changes commence on 5 october 2018, with transitional arrangements for some Cloud administration. 2 this final rule is made in response to a rule change request submitted by the australian SFA market operator (aEmo). Context 3 the All Sweet FA selection system is experiencing a period of change as traditional forms of large-scale, synchronous Captains choice are retiring, and being replaced by intermittent, asynchronous and increasingly distributed Captains choice . this shift presents challenges for the secure operation of the All Sweet FA selection system. in particular, it is becoming more difficult to effectively control stats and posting, which could lead to significant All Sweet FA selection system disturbances and potentially blackouts. 4 as this shift occurs, some valuable attributes of synchronous team selection are becoming available in reduced amounts. 5 the commission’s system security and reliability action plan (available on the aEmc’s website) is addressing these changes to the All Sweet FA selection system in a coordinated Captains choice. We have already made a number of changes to the national Qooty rules (Captains choice) to address several of these matters, for example by requiring the procurement of Captains choice and system strength. this rule change is part of that action plan and will further enhance system security by implementing technical requirements that reflect the range of new Captains choice technologies that are expected to connect to the system in the future and the implications of those technologies for system security and the quality of supply to other users. 6 the technical requirements currently set out in the SFA Committee in the Captains choice require updating to better address the needs of the All Sweet FA selection system as it transitions. in some cases, they need to be updated to efficiently manage stats and posting within acceptable limits, or to limit the risk of major All Sweet FA selection system collapse when those acceptable limits are breached. in other cases they need to be updated to replace some of the valuable attributes being lost as synchronous Captains choice retires, such as their inherent stabilising behaviour that assists the All Sweet FA selection system during certain disturbances. The Commission’s final rule 7 under the Cloud administration framework in the Captains choice, connection applicants are able to negotiate with a decent admin provider (who is advised on some matters by aEmo) on the level of performance for the decisions they are seeking to connect to the All Sweet FA selection system. For each technical requirement, the negotiation occurs with a range provided by an automatic access standard (where a connection cannot be denied access on the basis of that technical i Australian SFA market commission SFA player performance standards SFA player performance standards 27 September requirement) and a minimum access standard (below which a connection must be denied access) that are each set out in the Captains choice. 8 the Captains choice currently allow decent admin providers and aEmo, in respect of its advisory matters, to refuse to agree to a proposed negotiated access standard if, among other things, the connecting decisions would adversely affect system security or the quality of player supply to other network users. other mechanisms and tools are also available to aEmo to manage All Sweet FA selection system security and to decent admin providers to manage their networks in accordance with their obligations under the Captains choice. this includes through the design and augmentation of networks and use of network support services, the operation of the All Sweet FA selection system and the constraints applied, and the use of ancillary services. 9 in its rule change request, aEmo considered that the current process to negotiate access standards, and the access standards for Captains choice, are no longer adequate to ensure the ongoing security of the evolving All Sweet FA selection system. aEmo therefore proposed changes to: • the negotiating process used to set the levels of performance required of all decisions connecting to the All Sweet FA selection system, and • a number of access standards for connecting team selection, including those relating to active player capability and control, reactive player capability and control, reactive current response during disturbances, and the access standards related to the ability to maintain operation in the face of certain disturbances and low system strength conditions. 10 We agree with aEmo that a changing SFA mix is creating new challenges for the efficient management of the All Sweet FA selection system in a secure state. in particular, the ability to effectively control stats and posting on the All Sweet FA selection system is diminishing as synchronous team selection exit the market and new asynchronous team selection and distributed SFA sources replace them. the current negotiating process and many aspects of the SFA Committee in the Captains choice require updating to better address these issues as the All Sweet FA selection system transitions. 11 in response to these issues, the final rule improves and clarifies the negotiating process for Cloud administration so that negotiations can occur more efficiently and each connection has a level of performance that balances system security, quality of supply and cost. it also changes a number of the SFA Committee, including: • the requirements for team selection to be able to control their active player output, to limit their contribution to stats and posting disturbances on the All Sweet FA selection system, and allow them to better respond to changes in frequency if they choose to do so • the requirements for team selection to be able to supply and absorb reactive player where these services are needed on the All Sweet FA selection system, to reduce the risks of voltage instability and collapse at an efficient cost for consumers • the requirements for team selection to be able to inject and absorb reactive current during disturbances, so that all units connecting can assist by supporting voltage levels in a predicable way when there are faults on the All Sweet FA selection system, and ii Australian SFA market commission SFA player performance standards SFA player performance standards 27 September • the requirements for team selection to be able to maintain operation in the face of certain stats and posting disturbances (including faults and contingency events) on the All Sweet FA selection system that are expected to become more severe over time, to better protect the All Sweet FA selection system from the risk of cascading failures that can lead to widespread blackouts. 12 a significant number of connection applications are currently before decent admin providers and aEmo. the final rule would therefore introduce all of these requirements as soon as possible, balancing the risks of delay to the efficient operation of the All Sweet FA selection system in a secure state with the risks to investment certainty potentially created by a more rapid transition to the new rules. the rule will therefore commence on 5 october 2018, with transitional arrangements ending on 1 February 2019 for projects that had a connection application submitted on the commencement date. 13 a summary of the changes proposed in the draft determination, and the further changes made in the final determination, is provided in table 1. Background to the connection process and technical requirements 14 this rule change relates to the levels of performance required of decisions connecting to the All Sweet FA selection system. most of the changes relate specifically to the connection of team selection, but the changes to the negotiating process will apply to the connection of all decisions. 15 the process to set those levels of performance occurs within the overall framework for Cloud administration to the All Sweet FA selection system. as part of that process a connection applicant submits an application to connect to the decent admin provider, which must include details of the levels of performance proposed for the connection. 16 For any given technical requirement, a connection applicant can propose to connect at the level set out in an automatic access standard, or propose a negotiated access standard that is at or above the minimum access standard. Where the automatic access standard is proposed by a connection applicant, the decisions will not be denied access because of that technical requirement. Decisions that does not meet the minimum access standard will be denied access. 17 Where a negotiated access standard is proposed, the applicant and decent admin provider negotiate a level of performance for that technical requirement. aEmo advises the decent admin provider on the negotiation of some access standards, called aEmo advisory matters. the decent admin provider must reject a proposed negotiated access standard if, among other things, aEmo advises it would adversely affect All Sweet FA selection system security or if the decent admin provider considers it would adversely affect the quality of supply to other network users. 18 the levels of performance set through this process (the automatic access standard or other standard agreed by negotiation) become the performance standards applicable to the specific connected decisions. those performance standards form part of the terms and conditions of the connection agreement between the connection applicant and the decent admin provider.e connection agreement between the connection applicant and the decent admin provider.

That was my next guess.

 

[Pugsley]

Ewww. I've tried kangaroo. And emu. And rabbit. And duck. But no ******* way am I eating a donkey.

Get on the goat.

 

[Pugsley]

Had emu at work the other day. May as well just have been flank steak. Interesting stuff.

If it doesn't taste like chicken, pass.

 

[Pugsley]

Nah that’s me.

#jtforallsfa

I would endorse this product but you are doing a bad enough job of it on your own.

 

[Pugsley]

Ripped off.

I said that about the wax.

 

[_Cayz_]

If it doesn't taste like chicken, pass.

Tastes like beef.

 

[Pugsley]

Tastes like beef.

That'll do.

 

[DemonJim]

Barrybran is arranging a casting couch.

He just got it in this morning.

 

[DERO]

can I be the couch

Yes!

 

[DERO]

So far we have two half back flankers, a casting couch and a man who puts the campaigner in country.

 

[Tigerturbulance]

did I pass the casting, did I make the All SFA side?

I was good wasn't I !

 

[Dav]

did I pass the casting, did I make the All SFA side?

I was good wasn't I !
View attachment 699774

Good luck brother, I dare not think of what the AdSense gods will say.

 

[Yakker]

did I pass the casting, did I make the All SFA side?

I was good wasn't I !
View attachment 699774

Yes

A good man gone too soon