Strategy The 3 second rule

Remove this Banner Ad

You know how if you drop something on the floor, popular wisdom is that it's 'okay' if it's only been there three seconds? (even though it's actually now covered with germs)

Well, let's extrapolate that to football, because it applies to how we play as well, or specifically, the options that we take. It should take only three seconds to assess every option available when it comes to playing on:

0dbff4de4fdfeeade2afc7fe1f0941bc.png


Adelaide were hugely successful in 2017 using the second and third phases of this style of play, because it gave them the appearance of being fast with ball movement. They loved those 45 degree kicks after they wheeled around to running players that were moving into space. However, when that avenue was shut down by Richmond's full-field press, their only option was to go back and take their kick - and if the option on the angle was closed down when they had just marked the ball, it was suicide when they went back to take their kick...so they were forced to head down the line.

Fortunately for Port...because of our leg speed and running capability, we have the first option - to wheel around and play on. What this does is force defences to make a choice - either be sucked toward the ball to stop the run, exposing their flank with a 45 degree kick or keep their defensive shape and be cut up with run and carry.

And even if we do have to go back and take our kick - since we have at least two contested marking forwards in Dixon and Watts, we are assured that sides won't simply push us to the line, because Dixon has the ability to win the contest.

Obviously, in order to execute this style of play you need kicks that actually reach their intended target quickly and clean grabs. You also need every player to be agile and athletic but with a thirst for the contest, because the only way to stop this style of play is at the source by denying the mark in the first place. But that's where our defensive systems kick in.

If it sounds simple, it is. Football, like any sport, is a simple game. In terms of tactics, it's just angles, which is basic mathematics. The hard part is the execution, especially under pressure. That's why it's important to put opposition players under pressure at all times - any team in the competition can win if given enough space and time to execute their method.

We have the effort and we have the method. This year, it's all about speed - specifically, how fast we can execute those two things together. Eventually, our speed will be so fast out of defence that our ball retention will be like quicksilver going down the field.

I posted this on the Hawthorn forum back in 2014, before we played them in R10:

Everytime I see us play live, it reminds me a little of Geelong 2007 mixed with a bit of Fremantle 2013. The defense is manic until a turnover occurs, then it's quick handballs/kicks trying to find the outlet in the open. Sometimes it doesn't work - it's still a work in progress - but when it's on, it looks fantastic. Got a feeling that it will be pretty tight for most of the game though.

We could play that way back in 2014 because opposition teams gave us the space to do so, because they didn't rate us very highly. Now, we are creating our own space. This is what we've been working towards for the past five years.

By the end of the year, we will be the greatest Australian Rules football team in the world. Of that I have no doubt.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You know how if you drop something on the floor, popular wisdom is that it's 'okay' if it's only been there three seconds? (even though it's actually now covered with germs)

Well, let's extrapolate that to football, because it applies to how we play as well, or specifically, the options that we take. It should take only three seconds to assess every option available when it comes to playing on:

0dbff4de4fdfeeade2afc7fe1f0941bc.png


Adelaide were hugely successful in 2017 using the second and third phases of this style of play, because it gave them the appearance of being fast with ball movement. They loved those 45 degree kicks after they wheeled around to running players that were moving into space. However, when that avenue was shut down by Richmond's full-field press, their only option was to go back and take their kick - and if the option on the angle was closed down when they had just marked the ball, it was suicide when they went back to take their kick...so they were forced to head down the line.

Fortunately for Port...because of our leg speed and running capability, we have the first option - to wheel around and play on. What this does is force defences to make a choice - either be sucked toward the ball to stop the run, exposing their flank with a 45 degree kick or keep their defensive shape and be cut up with run and carry.

And even if we do have to go back and take our kick - since we have at least two contested marking forwards in Dixon and Watts, we are assured that sides won't simply push us to the line, because Dixon has the ability to win the contest.

Obviously, in order to execute this style of play you need kicks that actually reach their intended target quickly and clean grabs. You also need every player to be agile and athletic but with a thirst for the contest, because the only way to stop this style of play is at the source by denying the mark in the first place. But that's where our defensive systems kick in.

If it sounds simple, it is. Football, like any sport, is a simple game. In terms of tactics, it's just angles, which is basic mathematics. The hard part is the execution, especially under pressure. That's why it's important to put opposition players under pressure at all times - any team in the competition can win if given enough space and time to execute their method.

We have the effort and we have the method. This year, it's all about speed - specifically, how fast we can execute those two things together. Eventually, our speed will be so fast out of defence that our ball retention will be like quicksilver going down the field.

I posted this on the Hawthorn forum back in 2014, before we played them in R10:



We could play that way back in 2014 because opposition teams gave us the space to do so, because they didn't rate us very highly. Now, we are creating our own space. This is what we've been working towards for the past five years.

By the end of the year, we will be the greatest Australian Rules football team in the world. Of that I have no doubt.
I will have what you are drinking! ;)
 
I have read this twice and I am still like


download (1).jpeg


Are you saying we have the leg speed to create the angles needed but lack the execution or we now have the execution?
 
I have read this twice and I am still like


View attachment 476122


Are you saying we have the leg speed to create the angles needed but lack the execution or we now have the execution?

Once the ball has been marked (which is what the X represents):

The first second is when the decision to play on is made. Once that second is past, that option is closed.

The second second is when the decision to kick on the angle is made. Once that second is past, that option is closed.

The third second...go back and take the kick.

Depending on where on the ground the mark is taken will determine whether both sides of play are open or just one, which is why we (and every other team) like getting into the corridor. It’s harder to cover 5 options instead of 3.
 
Once the ball has been marked (which is what the X represents):

The first second is when the decision to play on is made. Once that second is past, that option is closed.

The second second is when the decision to kick on the angle is made. Once that second is past, that option is closed.

The third second...go back and take the kick.

Depending on where on the ground the mark is taken will determine whether both sides of play are open or just one, which is why we (and every other team) like getting into the corridor. It’s harder to cover 5 options instead of 3.
Ok so before, we didn't have the leg speed for option 1 or 2 (when we did try them, it would cost us a turnover) so we ended up with option 3 99% of the time where as now we have the speed (skill?) to execute 1 and 2 more regularly?
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Ok so before, we didn't have the leg speed for option 1 or 2 (when we did try them, it would cost us a turnover) so we ended up with option 3 99% of the time where as now we have the speed (skill?) to execute 1 and 2 more regularly?

Ah, no.

Back in 2014 we were able to use options 1 and 2 all the time because teams weren’t concerned about us and actively tried to turn the ball over as quickly as possible, which gave us heaps of space (as it did for Adelaide last year).

Then when teams dropped back a few players to stop the run, we’d still keep trying the same tactics, which made it difficult to execute. We needed to add the third option and retain the ball up the ground.

When you can do that...you open up options one and two again, because suddenly teams have to push up again to try to create a marking contest.
 
Instinctive and Predictable. Wonderful in theory. Lets see if we can master it against the best sides.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top