The rankings (from best to worst) of the 123 VFL/AFL premiership sides

[BF Tiger]

Since the Eagles and Bears entered in 1987.

1.) Essendon 2000. This team earnt the right to be called the greatest in VFL-AFL history with a 24-1 record, a percentage of 163.9 from 25 games, winning three finals by an equal-record combined 230 points with margins of 125, 45 and 60 and a percentage versus the finalists of 160% - 20% higher than any other team in the modern era has managed. At no stage did they look like losing, with even their one loss being narrow, after having 27 more inside 50's, with the Bulldogs having to tactically change the way the sport was played. The Essendon team of 2000 did everything that you could ask, in order for them to be called the best ever. As close to being unbeatable as a team has ever been in VFL-AFL history, with the closest challenge being...

4.) Hawthorn 1989. The Hawthorn side of ’89 was their best in one of the most powerful eras in history. The Hawks reached their zenith in ’89. They went 21-3, with a percentage of 149.5, had champions everywhere and at their best, were simply unstoppable. I rate them the 4th best of 123 premierships sides. However, unlike Essendon of 2000, or Collingwood of 1929, they didn’t quite have the aura of being totally invincible. Their loss to the Bears holds them back a spot.

6.)Geelong 2007. A fantastically dominant team in '07, winning the Grand Final be a record margin, having a percentage for the year over 160% from 25 games. Only great teams can do that. A team, who used skillful, attacking "corridor" midfield play, complimented with a group of players in the mid 20's who have played over 100 games giving them the perfect mix of youth and experience. 21-4, a percentage over 160% and three finals wins by a total of 230 points.

7.) Geelong 2011 A dominant team who didn't have any flat-spots finishing 22-3 with a percentage of 157%. The second oldest premiership side in history meant a wealth of mature bodies and experience. 3 easy finals wins, and a tough defence. More of a long kicking game plan with a defensive edge to it than the flags sides of 2007 and 2009, but perhaps a little less dominant overall than the 2007 side which is ranked one spot higher

10.) Hawthorn 1988. Only behind their ‘89 team due to their inferior defence which conceded 200 points more than the ’89 model. This great team was ruthless, skilled and efficient, and amassed a 21-3 record. Many believe they peaked in ’88, but I believe the Hawks reached their absolute zenith in 1989. Deserve their ranking as the 9th best out of 123.

13.) Carlton 1995. This great side had it all - experience, hardness, skill, and a willingness to win. Amassing a 23-2 record with a percentage of 140.6% they played with a professionalism that no club had previously matched. Incredibly, did not lose to a finalist all year. They didn’t quite have the same aura of invincibility as some of the sides in the top 10, but their almost unbeatable record alone ensures them a high ranking.

27. Collingwood 2010
28. Hawthorn 2015
31. Port Adelaide 2004
32. West Coast 1992
42. West Coast 1994
43. North Melbourne 1996
44. Hawthorn 2013
45. Geelong 2009
46. Brisbane 2002
49. Hawthorn 2014
60. Hawthorn 2008
61. Brisbane 2001
70. Carlton 1987
72. Brisbane 2003
78. Hawthorn 1991
79. Sydney 2012
80. Richmond 2017
82. Richmond 2019
85. West Coast 2018
90. West Coast 2006
98. Collingwood 1990
105. Western Bulldogs 2016
107. Essendon 1993
110. Adelaide 1998
113. Adelaide 1997 (like any flag side they were good, but there were many better)
114. Sydney 2005 (workmanlike, needed everything to go right)
119. Kangaroos 1999 (Worst defence of the top-10 teams. Percentage of 115%)

 

[The Cryptkeeper]

If you look our 2000 form as a singularity....we would’ve beaten anyone including those sides you mentioned.

On every line we were that good.

I know it’s hard to accept but that Essendon 2000 side was the best team of all time. There’s just no other team that can compare.

Explain the one flag and one losing GF then.

Geelong, Hawthorn, Brisbane and now Richmond put together more impressive bodies of work than that Essendon team. If you were that good you would have been a force for years. You won one flag against a rubbish GF opponent, were exposed by a truly great team the following year and pretty much faded away after that. Judging a team's greatness based on one year of work where it is impossible to measure the collective ability of the competition against other years is about the dumbest way of trying to justify their position.

Great teams don't win one flag and fade away. Great teams back it up very quickly afterwards. Essendon 2000 had a great season but they were not a great team when measured against the truly great teams.

The thread is no more than a subjective list put together by an Essendon fanboy to try to validate his own football club. The most blatantly obvious thing about this is that the OP uses stats to justify Essendon's position at the top yet conveniently disregards statistical analysis when it doesn't suit his argument in rankling the teams below. This is most startlingly revealed by the following:

113. Adelaide 1997 (like any flag side they were good, but there were many better)
114. Sydney 2005 (workmanlike, needed everything to go right)

OP uses stats when it suits him and just makes up crap when it doesn't.

 

[Shane Heard]

Explain the one flag and one losing GF then.

Geelong, Hawthorn, Brisbane and now Richmond put together more impressive bodies of work than that Essendon team. If you were that good you would have been a force for years. You won one flag against a rubbish GF opponent, were exposed by a truly great team the following year and pretty much faded away after that. Judging a team's greatness based on one year of work where it is impossible to measure the collective ability of the competition against other years is about the dumbest way of trying to justify their position.

Great teams don't win one flag and fade away. Great teams back it up very quickly afterwards. Essendon 2000 had a great season but they were not a great team when measured against the truly great teams.

The thread is no more than a subjective list put together by an Essendon fanboy to try to validate his own football club. The most blatantly obvious thing about this is that the OP uses stats to justify Essendon's position at the top yet conveniently disregards statistical analysis when it doesn't suit his argument in rankling the teams below. This is most startlingly revealed by the following:

113. Adelaide 1997 (like any flag side they were good, but there were many better)
114. Sydney 2005 (workmanlike, needed everything to go right)

OP uses stats when it suits him and just makes up crap when it doesn't.

In a single season. No team can compare mate.

But keep rattling on by all means.

 

[blckcaviar]

The thread is no more than a subjective list put together by an Essendon fanboy to try to validate his own football club.

Yup

 

[BF Tiger]

In a single season. No team can compare mate.

But keep rattling on by all means.

Carlton 1908 lost only one game all season. That was to the team that finished second in the H&A season and who they then beat in the GF. Compared to Essendon who lost to the team that finished seventh. Carlton 1908 also had a superior percentage to Essendon 2000.

 

[Shane Heard]

Carlton 1908 lost only one game all season. That was to the team that finished second in the H&A season and who they then beat in the GF. Compared to Essendon who lost to the team that finished seventh. Carlton 1908 also had a superior percentage to Essendon 2000.

We lost to dogs because Wallace flooded our forward line like no one had ever seen before.

I think it was Brad Johnson who kicked a goal in the last minute for a narrow 11pt victory.

Then we kicked 68 goals 60 pts in total in the finals. Qualifying, Pre lim and gf.

Who comes close to that I ask you?

 

[BF Tiger]

We lost to dogs because Wallace flooded our forward line like no one had ever seen before.

I think it was Brad Johnson who kicked a goal in the last minute for a narrow 11pt victory.

Then we kicked 68 goals 60 pts in total in the finals. Qualifying, Pre lim and gf.

Who comes close to that I ask you?

Didn’t you read my post. Carlton 1908 not only came close but superseded Essendon 2000. The stats don’t lie.

Essendon 2000 finals % was 201
Carlton 1908 finals % was 219

 

[The Cryptkeeper]

We lost to dogs because Wallace flooded our forward line like no one had ever seen before.

I think it was Brad Johnson who kicked a goal in the last minute for a narrow 11pt victory.

Then we kicked 68 goals 60 pts in total in the finals. Qualifying, Pre lim and gf.

Who comes close to that I ask you?

That's not really the point though. The OP dismisses the Essendon loss to the Dogs in 2001 (he even makes excuses for it) yet drops Hawthorn 1989 a spot because they lost to the Bears.

Then the OP rates the Brisbane 2001 side as about average in terms of premiership winning teams and a full 60 places below the 2000 Essendon side...the alleged greatest premiership team of all time. And he does this in spite of the Brisbane team BEATING more or less the alleged greatest premiership team of all time to win that 2001 flag. The OP's rationale for all of this is tenuous at best and downright insulting to any intelligent human being at worst.

The OP uses only the parameters that suit his argument whilst dismissing anything that doesn't. The OP has also completely overlooked a whole host of factors that would contribute to a reasonable debate on the topic. For example, how was the health of the Essendon list in 2000 compared to their opposition? Did they have significant injuries to key players or was it a healthy list playing against injury depleted lists. Richmond 2019 had injuries everywhere, Hawthorn 2014 was the same. What was the level of competition? Were Essendon that good in light of the fact that they delivered nothing after 2000 or did they take advantage of the fact that a brilliant North Melbourne side was in decline and there was a lack of emerging challengers?

To simply say "we went 21-1 and only lost to the Dogs when we really should have won, blah, blah, blah" is a simpleton's argument. There are many more variables than the OP (or indeed any of us) has the capacity to consider.

 

[Dr Tigris]

Pretty good list I reckon. Of course it's very subjective, but every spot I looked at made sense.

The key thing being that it is normalized to the year. So people look and say that was the GREAT BRISBANE TEAM. Yes it was dominant for 3 years. But in any single year it wasn't that dominant.

I could say a similar, but lesser, thing about the current tiger team. 2 premierships in 3 years and best in 2018 bar one poor game. Doesn't mean that any year was truly dominant.

Plus almost all premiership teams were incredibly good. A few lucky ones. But to win the title you have to be very good compared to all the other teams in the comp. So you would expect a few outliers on top and a few on the bottom and then 80% being pretty much the same, with small differences. That's what the list shows. Easy to argue that this team is better than that team. But looking back compared to their premiership year they were very similar in performance.

The Squiggle gives you a more quantitative thing to look at. It shows the style of the team and how they compared to that year. But quant analysis can also hide things. So I always find this interesting. especially 2017 and 2019.

 

[Shane Heard]

Didn’t you read my post. Carlton 1908 not only came close but superseded Essendon 2000. The stats don’t lie.

Essendon 2000 finals % was 201
Carlton 1908 finals % was 219

1908? Come on man..that’s a bit rich.

Ya reaching ...

 

[Shane Heard]

That's not really the point though. The OP dismisses the Essendon loss to the Dogs in 2001 (he even makes excuses for it) yet drops Hawthorn 1989 a spot because they lost to the Bears.

Then the OP rates the Brisbane 2001 side as about average in terms of premiership winning teams and a full 60 places below the 2000 Essendon side...the alleged greatest premiership team of all time. And he does this in spite of the Brisbane team BEATING more or less the alleged greatest premiership team of all time to win that 2001 flag. The OP's rationale for all of this is tenuous at best and downright insulting to any intelligent human being at worst.

The OP uses only the parameters that suit his argument whilst dismissing anything that doesn't. The OP has also completely overlooked a whole host of factors that would contribute to a reasonable debate on the topic. For example, how was the health of the Essendon list in 2000 compared to their opposition? Did they have significant injuries to key players or was it a healthy list playing against injury depleted lists. Richmond 2019 had injuries everywhere, Hawthorn 2014 was the same. What was the level of competition? Were Essendon that good in light of the fact that they delivered nothing after 2000 or did they take advantage of the fact that a brilliant North Melbourne side was in decline and there was a lack of emerging challengers?

To simply say "we went 21-1 and only lost to the Dogs when we really should have won, blah, blah, blah" is a simpleton's argument. There are many more variables than the OP (or indeed any of us) has the capacity to consider.

“That's not really the point though. The OP dismisses the Essendon loss to the Dogs in 2001 (he even makes excuses for it) yet drops Hawthorn 1989 a spot because they lost to the Bears”

You mean 2000? Bulldogs loss.

You’re all over the place with your argument in so many places matey. You’d be a #### lawyer.

We had a fantastic season in 2001.

But come gf day we were underdone. That’s footy.

I was at the game early in the year when they beat us at the Gabba.

I can go into detail why lions beat us but you probably won’t listen.

Anyways...7 goal average winning margin over an entire season.

Ya just can’t best that folks.

 

[BF Tiger]

1908? Come on man..that’s a bit rich.

Ya reaching ...

Ok. Let’s just state what the thread is...

The rankings (from best to worst) of the 122 VFL/AFL premiership sides, excluding the dominant 1908 Carlton side that shades the Essendon 2000 side, this leaving Essendon 2000 as number 1 in the rankings.

 

[Thrawn]

That's not really the point though. The OP dismisses the Essendon loss to the Dogs in 2001 (he even makes excuses for it) yet drops Hawthorn 1989 a spot because they lost to the Bears.

Then the OP rates the Brisbane 2001 side as about average in terms of premiership winning teams and a full 60 places below the 2000 Essendon side...the alleged greatest premiership team of all time. And he does this in spite of the Brisbane team BEATING more or less the alleged greatest premiership team of all time to win that 2001 flag. The OP's rationale for all of this is tenuous at best and downright insulting to any intelligent human being at worst.

The OP uses only the parameters that suit his argument whilst dismissing anything that doesn't. The OP has also completely overlooked a whole host of factors that would contribute to a reasonable debate on the topic. For example, how was the health of the Essendon list in 2000 compared to their opposition? Did they have significant injuries to key players or was it a healthy list playing against injury depleted lists. Richmond 2019 had injuries everywhere, Hawthorn 2014 was the same. What was the level of competition? Were Essendon that good in light of the fact that they delivered nothing after 2000 or did they take advantage of the fact that a brilliant North Melbourne side was in decline and there was a lack of emerging challengers?

To simply say "we went 21-1 and only lost to the Dogs when we really should have won, blah, blah, blah" is a simpleton's argument. There are many more variables than the OP (or indeed any of us) has the capacity to consider.

A fully fit Carlton side in the GF with Kouta in full flight might have beaten them.

 

[Werewolf]

Seems to be bit of a pointless exercise. I can’t see how you can compare a team in the 1950’s to a team in 2019.

With the professionalism, resources and training standards of today compared to back then, the Gold Coast Suns would likely defeat the Melbourne of 1956.

Any modern team would defeat even the best teams from 40+ years ago due to fitness and skills. So you're missing the point of the thread.

These rankings are based on (1) the W/L record and percentage of the premiership team and (2) their standing relative to their nearest competition for that particular year. Standout teams are ranked near the top while teams that pinched a flag in an even year are ranked lower. Whether a team manages to go back to back (or three-peat) is irrelevant. Sure, some of the rankings are questionable - one that stands out for me is that Footscray 1954 should be above Carlton 1945 - but it's a huge task to rank 123 premiership sides and there are numerous correct ways in which it can be done.

 

[Vassp]

All points moot, too many variables. Greatest grand final team is.......the team that won it.

 

[Captain_Bender]

Essendon's mediocre midfield of 2000 would get destroyed by the midfields of sides such as Brisbane 2001-2004 Geelong 2007-2011 and Hawthorn 2012-2015

 

[Heisenberg_]

Don’t agree with Brisbane 2001 being ranked 60th

Beat the greatest side of all time and couldn’t even get into the top 50, brings the lists credibility into question imo.

Also 2019 was a much better side then 2017

 

[The King!]

my mate says that 1916 fitzroy side is underrated

 

[The King!]

Essendon's mediocre midfield of 2000 would get destroyed by the midfields of sides such as Brisbane 2001-2004 Geelong 2007-2011 and Hawthorn 2012-2015

they had a great year, but that was a pretty weak year

that demons side they played werent much chop

 

[HurleyHepsHird]

Longest running bit in bigfooty history.

Even Robbie would be impressed with this commitment to being on ones bullshit.

 

[Tiger2709]

my mate says that 1916 fitzroy side is underrated

Won the spoon and the flag in one year.

 

[CarterS]

I remember this thread from when I first joined the forum in 2001. Amazing stuff to have it still going Dan.

 

[doppleganger]

Then the OP rates the Brisbane 2001 side as about average in terms of premiership winning teams and a full 60 places below the 2000 Essendon side...the alleged greatest premiership team of all time. And he does this in spite of the Brisbane team BEATING more or less the alleged greatest premiership team of all time to win that 2001 flag.

You don’t follow what he is doing.

In 2001 Brisbane were a 17-5 side with a % of 127 who weren’t minor premiers.

So yeah in terms of individual premiership winning seasons, that is mediocre.

The OP's rationale for all of this is tenuous at best and downright insulting to any intelligent human being at worst.

The OP uses only the parameters that suit his argument whilst dismissing anything that doesn't.

He is pretty clear to be fair.

Just looks at respective records in isolation for each year.

Essendon going 21-1 with a % of 160 and then blitzing finals, that is a dominant season.

Not sure how anyone could argue otherwise...apart from the Pie saying 18-0 with a % of 171!

Essendon were a great team, they won three minor premierships on the trot and went 56-10 from 99-01....thank * they shat the bed in the 99 PF and were walking wounded in 01 GF.

To simply say "we went 21-1 and only lost to the Dogs when we really should have won, blah, blah, blah" is a simpleton's argument. There are many more variables than the OP (or indeed any of us) has the capacity to consider.

Of course you need to narrow it down to a simple argument...ultimately they are all premiers.

I would imagine a Dog supporter wouldn’t change the amazing finals run in 2016 for anything...but if trying to ‘rank’ individual premiership teams it has to be low as they came from 7th. Similar for the Adelaide wins.

Not sure why you have ur panties all twisted over it?

 

[Barry_Badrinath]

Beat the greatest side of all time and couldn’t even get into the top 50, brings the lists credibility into question imo.

Also 2019 was a much better side then 2017

Not to mention finishing the season on a 16 game winning streak

 

[AuntyBlindEye]

Thanks to everyone for their continued support. This exercise is now in its 18th consecutive year.

Time to see where the latest premiership team fits in to to the list. I use my own knowledge from the time of have spent watching football combined with anecdotal, statistical, and written accounts from the early years to rank the 123 premiership teams. I use relativity, taking into account the standard of the competition at the time, so as to not disadvantage teams from the past who were not competing in a national competition, with the resources and professionalism of modern day clubs.

Richmond won the 2019 premiership. That clubs 12th flag and their 7th in the last 53 years. They had

- a 19-6 season.
- a percentage from 25 games of 121.04%
- Three finals wins by 47, 19, and 89 points
- 3rd on the ladder at end of H&A season
- The 7th best attack
- The 4th best defence

Richmond were the consumate team. They have built their side on a selfless team-first mentality, based around hard-running, manic defence, and thumping the ball forward at all times to create scoring opportunities. They withstood a tough injury run early to power home after the mid-season bye. In the 18 years I have been doing this exercise, I found this side the hardest to rate. Never has a premiership side been so contrasted by it's first half and second half of the season. Their second half of the season was exemplary - almost faultless. Their first 13 games, though yielded a 7-6 record and a percentage of just 92%, and this exercise must take into account the entire season. I have decided to rank them at number 82, about 2/3rds of the way down the list, two spots below their 2017 premiership side.

1.) Essendon 2000. This team earnt the right to be called the greatest in VFL-AFL history with a 24-1 record, a percentage of 163.9 from 25 games, winning three finals by an equal-record combined 230 points with margins of 125, 45 and 60 and a percentage versus the finalists of 160% - 20% higher than any other team in the modern era has managed. At no stage did they look like losing, with even their one loss being narrow, after having 27 more inside 50's, with the Bulldogs having to tactically change the way the sport was played. The Essendon team of 2000 did everything that you could ask, in order for them to be called the best ever. As close to being unbeatable as a team has ever been in VFL-AFL history, with the closest challenge being.....

2.) Collingwood 1929. This team went 19-1 over 20 matches with a percentage of 159.5. They had champions on every line, and were regarded as the greatest combination to have played to that point. The ONLY team to ever be unbeaten in the H&A season. Collingwood fans may label them the best ever VFL-AFL side – I put them at number 2 out of 123. A 62 point loss to Richmond in the finals costs them the number one position on my list. Gordon Coventry was the first to person to kick 100 goals (124) and the Pies completed the treble with Albert Collier winning the Brownlow.

3.) Melbourne 1956. The Dees were at their zenith this year with an 18-2 record and a percentage of 149.4%. Coached by the VFL-AFL coach of the century, Norm Smith and with champion players such as Barassi, Adams, Cordner and Beckwith leading the way, the 1956 Melbourne side was their best side in the most dominant era by one club in VFL-AFL history. A side that could turn it on at will. Many old-timers suggest this was the type of team who could have gone undefeated if they really wanted to.

4.) Hawthorn 1989. The Hawthorn side of ’89 was their best in one of the most powerful eras in history. The Hawks reached their zenith in ’89. They went 21-3, with a percentage of 149.5, had champions everywhere and at their best, were simply unstoppable. I rate them the 4th best of 123 premierships sides. However, unlike Essendon of 2000, or Collingwood of 1929, they didn’t quite have the aura of being totally invincible. Their loss to the Bears holds them back a spot.

5.) Essendon 1950. Tempted to put them higher, but number 5 is fair enough. Here was a team that was near invincible. Just look at their record: 19-1, with a percentage of 159.2. With Coleman at his peak, Dick Reynolds and Hutchison lurking, this was the best Essendon side in their golden era. At the time, many rated this side alongside the 1929 Magpies team as the best of all time.

6.)Geelong 2007. A fantastically dominant team in '07, winning the Grand Final be a record margin, having a percentage for the year over 160% from 25 games. Only great teams can do that. A team, who used skillful, attacking "corridor" midfield play, complimented with a group of players in the mid 20's who have played over 100 games giving them the perfect mix of youth and experience. 21-4, a percentage over 160% and three finals wins by a total of 230 points.

7.) Geelong 2011 A dominant team who didn't have any flat-spots finishing 22-3 with a percentage of 157%. The second oldest premiership side in history meant a wealth of mature bodies and experience. 3 easy finals wins, and a tough defence. More of a long kicking game plan with a defensive edge to it than the flags sides of 2007 and 2009, but perhaps a little less dominant overall than the 2007 side which is ranked one spot higher

8.) Carlton 1908. Carlton’s first golden era produced three great sides, the best of which was the 1908 side. Jack Worrall became the first ever coach, and propelled the Blues to 19-1, with a percentage of 173.7%. Old timers still hold this side as the greatest, and if modern coaching techniques were applied, no doubt they would still be hard to beat in the present day.

9.) Melbourne 1955. Marginally behind the 1956 side, this Melbourne side went 17-3 with a percentage of 150.3%, and showed the makings of a team that would continue to dominate for years to come. The 1955 Melbourne side was heralded as one of the all time greats. A great even spread of talent with no reliance on individuals - a hallmark of the Melbourne teams of this era

10.) Hawthorn 1988. Only behind their ‘89 team due to their inferior defence which conceded 200 points more than the ’89 model. This great team was ruthless, skilled and efficient, and amassed a 21-3 record. Many believe they peaked in ’88, but I believe the Hawks reached their absolute zenith in 1989. Deserve their ranking as the 9th best out of 123.

11.) Collingwood 1927. After losing the Grand Final in 1925 and 1926, this side was ready to peak. They amassed a 17-3 record, with many superstars, proving they could be a champion team and a team of champions. With Coventry kicking 97 goals, and his brother winning the Brownlow, the 1927 side featured the Magpies greats close to their best.

12.) Geelong 1952. Although other teams have amassed superior records, this Geelong side was still one of the greatest in history. They won the premiership in the middle of an unbeaten run that would stretch to 26 consecutive games into the following season, and their attacking, free-flowing style of play became a Geelong tradition. Their 18-2-1 record (140.2%) was a testament to their greatness. Geelong’s best ever side until 2007.

13.) Carlton 1995. This great side had it all - experience, hardness, skill, and a willingness to win. Amassing a 23-2 record with a percentage of 140.6% they played with a professionalism that no club had previously matched. Incredibly, did not lose to a finalist all year. They didn’t quite have the same aura of invincibility as some of the sides in the top 10, but their almost unbeatable record alone ensures them a high ranking.

14.) Carlton 1979. With a 21-3 record and a percentage of 138.9%, and three narrow, spaced losses, this team didn’t have any obvious weaknesses. They nearly blew it in the Grand Final, but their performances through the year were worthy of one of the all time great sides. A rampant mosquito fleet, with a bevy of big name stars all over the field.

15.) Essendon 1985. Sheedy's team peaked to such an extent that they blew away the opposition with a 21-3 record, and were hailed as one of the grea sides of all time. With no apparent weaknesses, a top ruckman, onballers, options everywhere in attack, and a solid defence, this side ranks as one of the greats. Their three losses were all substantial which takes a little away from them, but I still rate them at number 15 out of 123.

16.) Collingwood 1928 Slightly behind their 1929, and 1927 sides the '28 side was one of the greats but perhaps not that far ahead of the other contenders that year. Finished with a 17-3-1 record, and a percentage of 132.5%. Right smack-bang in the middle of the Magpies most famous era. Won the Grand Final by 33 points. Gordon Coventry kicked 89 goals.

17.) Melbourne 1960 This Melbourne side amassed a 16-4 record but with the players at their disposal, that record arguably didn’t do them justice. This was a side that could have easily gone through the season losing only one or two games. In their 7th consecutive Grand Final, they kept Collingwood to only 2.2.14.

18.) Essendon 1911 Under the guidance of the first super-coach, Jack Worrall, who previously led the Blues to three consecutive premierships, the Same Old's as they were known at the time amassed a 17-2-1 record with a percentage (including finals) of 173.3%! The two losses were by 3 and 8 points. Unlucky not to be higher.

19.) Melbourne 1959 Another Demons super-side from their golden era. Not talked about in the same breath as 1955, 56, but this side, along with 1960, were at roughly the same level. The team has a 15-4-1 record from 20 games, winning two finals by 44 and 37 points

20.) Carlton 1907 A great side that would become even better one year later. This side topped the ladder with a percentage of 155.7%. Coached by the first VFL coach, the great Jack Worrall, the Carlton 2007 side was one of the greats.

21.) Hawthorn 1986 Just when it seemed the era was coming to and end in 1985, the experienced ruthless Hawks bounced back in 1986 to finish minor-premiers with 18 wins, and crushed Carlton by 42 points in the Grand Final. The difference between a young Jason Dunstall kicking 77 goals from 22 games in 1986, compared to his 132 in 1988 and 138 in 1989, is essentially the difference between the rankings of where those teams sit compared to this one.
________________________________________________________
22. Essendon 1962
23. Geelong 1937
24. Fitzroy 1913
25. Fitzroy 1899
26. South Melbourne 1933
27. Collingwood 2010
28. Hawthorn 2015
29. Essendon 1901
30. Geelong 1925
31. Port Adelaide 2004
32. West Coast 1992
33. Richmond 1974
34. Hawthorn 1971
35. Fitzroy 1898
36. Carlton 1906
37. Collingwood 1902
38. South Melbourne 1909
39. South Melbourne 1918
40. Essendon 1984
41. Richmond 1967
42. West Coast 1994
43. North Melbourne 1996
44. Hawthorn 2013
45. Geelong 2009
46. Brisbane 2002
47. Richmond 1932
48. Collingwood 1930
49. Hawthorn 2014
50. Melbourne 1957
51. Melbourne 1964
52. Essendon 1946
53. Geelong 1951
54. Collingwood 1936
55. Geelong 1931
56. Collingwood 1903
57. Carlton 1914
58. Collingwood 1919
59. Carlton 1915
60. Hawthorn 2008
61. Brisbane 2001
62. Richmond 1980
63. Carlton 1981
64. Carlton 1972
65. Essendon 1949
66. Carlton 1982
67. Geelong 1963
68. Hawthorn 1961
69. Hawthorn 1983
70. Carlton 1987
71. Richmond 1934
72. Brisbane 2003
73. Richmond 1969
74. Melbourne 1939
75. St.Kilda 1966
76. Collingwood 1953
77. Carlton 1968
78. Hawthorn 1991
79. Sydney 2012
80. Richmond 2017
81. Carlton 1947
82. Richmond 2019
83. Richmond 1920
84. Essendon 1923
85. West Coast 2018
86. Essendon 1942
87. Melbourne 1926
88. Richmond 1973
89. Essendon 1965
90. West Coast 2006
91. Melbourne 1941
92. Fitzroy 1905
93. Fitzroy 1944
94. Carlton 1970
95. Carlton 1938
96. Richmond 1943
97. Collingwood 1935
98. Collingwood 1990
99. Collingwood 1958
100. Essendon 1924
101. Melbourne 1940
102. Hawthorn 1978
103. North Melbourne 1975
104. Hawthorn 1976
105. Western Bulldogs 2016
106. North Melbourne 1977
107. Essendon 1993
108. Collingwood 1910
109. Essendon 1897
110. Adelaide 1998
111. Fitzroy 1904
112. Fitzroy 1922
113. Adelaide 1997 (like any flag side they were good, but there were many better)
114. Sydney 2005 (workmanlike, needed everything to go right)
115. Essendon 1912 (stole it off South Melbourne)
116. Melbourne 1948 (stole if off Essendon)
117. Carlton 1945 (percentage of only 106% and came from 4th, as war ended.)
118. Footscray 1954 (a modest win-loss record in a very even year)
119. Kangaroos 1999 (Worst defence of the top-10 teams. Percentage of 115%)
120. Richmond 1921 (stole it off Carlton)
121. Collingwood 1917 (war years)
122. Melbourne 1900 (came from 6th and helped by finals system)
123. Fitzroy 1916 (war years. Won wooden spoon and flag)

Great stuff mate. Good read. Love that the 17 and 19 flags are so close, given the symmetry in our seasons those years.

I've wanted to do this for a while but it seemed like a bit of effort that I wasn't prepared to give.