surely this is a compensation/overcompensation thing, wrapping oneself in a flag, and assuming some mythic identity. The most militant in rhetoric zionists are in the Diaspora, not in the West Bank. I see this thru a similar lense.
anyone see this article on a scuffle betwee on a Brazillian tennis player, versus a Colombian female fan (he played a Colombian)
http://www.theage.com.au/sport/tenn...ctators-at-australian-open-20100120-mje4.html
here is the highlight
since when was the tennis so jingoistic and nationalist? Before Eastern and Central Europe entered the pro sports sphere (post Navratolova) there were fewer nations represented and less chance. But I cant remember Kooyong ever having much rancour at all.
Do those "Fanatics" have an inkling of their jingoistic mindlessness?
anyone see this article on a scuffle betwee on a Brazillian tennis player, versus a Colombian female fan (he played a Colombian)
http://www.theage.com.au/sport/tenn...ctators-at-australian-open-20100120-mje4.html
here is the highlight
the match between Belgian Christophe Rochus and American Donald Young was stopped for 40 minutes after a ball boy wet his pants on court 10.
"The ball kid peed on himself. It was unfortunate," Young said.
"It took a while to replace him. Then they had to put the sawdust down, or whatever you put down when somebody throws up.
"Then they had to use the blower (to dry the court) but the blower had no gas in it, so that took even more time."
since when was the tennis so jingoistic and nationalist? Before Eastern and Central Europe entered the pro sports sphere (post Navratolova) there were fewer nations represented and less chance. But I cant remember Kooyong ever having much rancour at all.
Do those "Fanatics" have an inkling of their jingoistic mindlessness?