And around and around we go.Do you have a source for that?
Go read the drug code yourself you poor lazy soul.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And around and around we go.Do you have a source for that?
"It is asserted that Rioli's A sample returned an Adverse Analytical Finding for Urine Substitution being a Prohibited Method following an Out-of-Competition doping control test on 20 August 2019."I’m pretty sure the charge hasn’t been publicly released yet?
Why though?His urine
Since when do you need to be doing those things to take enhancers? *. Half the local players around my area have taken gear.Why though?
He’s not trying to shave a second off his pb for sprinting, or gaining an extra inch for jumping. He’s not competing in the Tour de France or the CrossFit games. He owns his spot in the Eagles side and has no competition in holding it.
The version of events made public are very likely to be true. As I said I feel sorry for people like you actively campaigning for him to be strung up without any evidence
Did i say he needs to be strung up did i?Why though?
He’s not trying to shave a second off his pb for sprinting, or gaining an extra inch for jumping. He’s not competing in the Tour de France or the CrossFit games. He owns his spot in the Eagles side and has no competition in holding it.
The version of events made public are very likely to be true. As I said I feel sorry for people like you actively campaigning for him to be strung up without any evidence
Rioli has custody of the sample until he chooses to submit it. Rioli can throw it out and apologise for spilling his drink accidently then provide a sample.Do you have a source for that?
And around and around we go.
Go read the drug code yourself you poor lazy soul.
My god.A direct quote would be more convincing.
Regardless, what if a tester cannot ascertain whether what they saw is deliberate or accidental? Are they they there to decide these things, or observe and take a sample?
Pretty sure Rioli wouldn’t be taking enhancers to look pretty in a mirrorSince when do you need to be doing those things to take enhancers? fu**. Half the local players around my area have taken gear.
Head down to Spartans. Half the blokes there have tried enhancers.
It’s actually very common these days
Why are you pretty sure? Maybe he wanted to lose weight? Maybe he’s vain? Maybe someone called him fat and it upset him?Pretty sure Rioli wouldn’t be taking enhancers to look pretty in a mirror
I’m pretty sure the charge hasn’t been publicly released yet?
The finding is that a substitution was madeThe original post I quoted of yours you provided a list of examples of athletes punished for "tampering" and highlighted that it was different to "refusing to submit"
from the official AFL statement in the link:
"THE AFL on Thursday confirmed that a mandatory provisional suspension had been handed to West Coast Eagles player William Rioli following notification to him by ASADA of an Adverse Analytical Finding (AAF) and a potential violation of the Australian Football Anti-Doping Code (Code).
It is asserted that Rioli's A sample returned an Adverse Analytical Finding for Urine Substitution being a Prohibited Method following an Out-of-Competition doping control test on 20 August 2019."
Again, arent they also two different things?
No, I’m not claiming anything. I’m just not willing to label him a drug cheat until it’s been proven and I can see how the version of events made public are very plausibleWhy are you pretty sure? Maybe he wanted to lose weight? Maybe he’s vain? Maybe someone called him fat and it upset him?
You claiming he definitely took nothing because he’s not competing in the Tour de France is exactly the same as those claiming he did take PEDs.
You listed things he’s not doing as evidence of why he wouldn’t take PEDs. It’s not evidence either way. It’s just a random non pointNo, I’m not claiming anything. I’m just not willing to label him a drug cheat until it’s been proven and I can see how the version of events made public are very plausible
If that is the case what outcome for the media liar?
Surely it's some of the media parasites paid for their indiscretions like the players.
Tribunal should suspend them for Ex weeks for telling porkies.
That was the point of the press.
You listed things he’s not doing as evidence of why he wouldn’t take PEDs. It’s not evidence either way. It’s just a random non point
Apologies for not having read all 2500+ posts, but this rumour that he couldn’t pee for hours on end and that’s why he did it.... is it really plausible that with all the fluids you could possibly want, you still couldn’t come up with 50ml of pee after 3 hours?
Could he really have been that dehydrated?
The finding is that a substitution was made
Sick of fans getting so defensive when one or the whole team get caught with their hand in the lolly jar.No I've got it right, you need a way to vent your frustration at the team you support being perennial losers / tankers (is that cheating!), you thought you had a chance last year in the finals but the Eagles obliterated them and that inhalation went so deep it also ruined your team this year, Now that WC have had something bad happen you see it as a way to jump in boots and all as an outlet for your frustration....