Politics Alan Jones and the Send-a-Sock campaign

Remove this Banner Ad

It's only because he's right wing and all the LWNJs hate Jones with a passion (like they do with everyone who's not "left"). She's a buck toothed, communist, hypocrite who is very happy sticking her nose into Australian politics where it's not welcome. She got exactly what she deserves. No Prime Minister should ever make repeated negative comments about their neighbour like she does, especially when they're wrong. The most obvious example was her criticising Australia for not taking in enough refugees and yet we take in more per capita that New Zealand.

An no putrid radio commentator, clinging on for relevance should make comments suggesting the pm of Aus should give the leader of that neighbour and ally a ‘backhander’.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

pawleen salty as * over Yassmin
Tongue firmly up the parrots arse on this though


thick moron , yet still not as thick as the dickheads who vote for her
 
It's the LEVEL of outrage that gets me.
It's not like she said " Australians are all the sons of whores " or anything is it.


But , YET AGAIN the right never saw a perceived injustice they didn't melt like a 3yr old whose mummy didn't buy them an ice cream over.

Glass-jaws
She comes from a country where 80% of the power comes from old hydros and geothermal.

None of which the Greenies or geography would allow here. They also have zero industry and there agriculture industry produces far more CO2 per capita than Australia.

NZ has made almost no effort to reduce emissions, even the wood biomass, where as Australia on both sides have.

Hypocritical she is.
 
pawleen salty as fu** over Yassmin
Tongue firmly up the parrots arse on this though


thick moron , yet still not as thick as the dickheads who vote for her
Not enough use of "MUTT" for me there, crowboy. Lift your game ;)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Soft Downhill Skier can we play the "outrage trifle" game again? Where we discuss whether the initial outrage is lesser or greater than the secondary outrage that is a response to the original outrage, and then finally compare these two to the 3rd level of outrage directed at the second?
 
Soft Downhill Skier can we play the "outrage trifle" game again? Where we discuss whether the initial outrage is lesser or greater than the secondary outrage that is a response to the original outrage, and then finally compare these two to the 3rd level of outrage directed at the second?

Kind of what i'm saying , was no need whatsoever for jones to get THAT shitty over it.
 
Even if she is/was do you think the LEVEL of vitriol is appropriate ?
No that's fair, but considering the choice is Australia vs China the biggest polluter in the world maybe NZ should show solidarity with Australia. Winston Peters certainly got it.
 
Soft Downhill Skier can we play the "outrage trifle" game again? Where we discuss whether the initial outrage is lesser or greater than the secondary outrage that is a response to the original outrage, and then finally compare these two to the 3rd level of outrage directed at the second?
Lest we forget (Manus, Nauru...)
 
The outrage only works in his favor, like it did for Latham. The triggered public think they will silence people like Jones and Latham, but all it does is give them publicity and boost their profile further.
 
All you bagging a 78 year old gay bloke.
Surely you could excuse the so called mistakes of a guy not far from living in a nursing home.
Go a bit easy on our elderly folk.
You homophobe ageists

OUTRAGES

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top