GROTTO
TheBrownDog
- Jul 5, 2013
- 66,791
- 89,675
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
So salty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is anyone surprised?
Cotchin went for the ball and he could hardly have gone lower to avoid a high hit. How can you compare that with this disgusting off the ball behaviour?Sometimes it's easy to forget the AFL are in charge of making and manipulating these decisions. Like Ellis and Cotchin in 2017, you're allowed to get away with anything so long as it boosts ratings.
Hasn't stopped other players from being suspended for the same thing.Cotchin went for the ball and he could hardly have lower to avoid a high hit. How can you compare this disgusting off the ball behaviour?
you're acting like this is something newSo he got off because he's a good player?
AFL manipulating it's own rules very nicely.
I actually am a big fan of the bont and sometimes enjoy watching them (dogs) play (except for when they play for free kicks and when the umpires aren’t on your side).Bro, why have you invested so much time in this thread anyway? Be it through posts or liking anything anti-Bulldogs?
I guess when you support St Kilda, you gotta spend time on something in September hey?
I can’t recall the exact issues with Ellis. However, the tribunal has also changed a lot since 2017 too. This decision today is completely against what the AFL says it wants to stamp out.Hasn't stopped other players from being suspended for the same thing.
Want to defend the Ellis decision?
Can’t definitively see him digging his fingers into his eyes
The AFL were never going to suspend their own. It warranted 6 weeks. He's a grub. If Bont had any balls he'd have smacked him in the chops.Would've been much more surprised with a suspension, TBH...
Who cares what he aimed to do? What he did do was so unsportsmanlike and so against what we want to see our junior players do that it demanded suspension.I actually am a big fan of the bont and sometimes enjoy watching them (dogs) play (except for when they play for free kicks and when the umpires aren’t on your side).
But I am just sticking up for what I believe in and I believe he didn’t aim to eye gouge bontempelli.
And I’m just spending my off season the same as you (watching other teams in the finals)
Ah, here comes the backpedaling upon being called out for your agenda?I actually am a big fan of the bont and sometimes enjoy watching them (dogs) play (except for when they play for free kicks and when the umpires aren’t on your side).
But I am just sticking up for what I believe in and I believe he didn’t aim to eye gouge bontempelli.
And I’m just spending my off season the same as you (watching other teams in the finals)
Also keen to see this seemingly mythical footage.I just want to see the footage that some Dogs fans seem to have that shows the eye gouge. Where is it guys?
I can’t recall the exact issues with Ellis. However, the tribunal has also changed a lot since 2017 too. This decision today is completely against what the AFL says it wants to stamp out.
I actually am a big fan of the bont and sometimes enjoy watching them (dogs) play (except for when they play for free kicks and when the umpires aren’t on your side).
But I am just sticking up for what I believe in and I believe he didn’t aim to eye gouge bontempelli.
And I’m just spending my off season the same as you (watching other teams in the finals)
Irrelevant. I’m not a dog supporter but what he did was a dog act. We do not want our kids in junior leagues replicating this. He deserved at least 2 weeks for this.Dp any dogs supporters like him?
Short memory!?Sorry but this is a disgusting decision. What message are we sending our juniors? You can shove the opposition’s head into the turf, attempt to gouge eyes, scratch the players face and then all you have to do is be remorseful and you can avoid a suspension.
This is an absolute disgrace.