Jones and buzza have no future. Simpson probably doesnt. Krueger got injured at the wrong time.Players who did not play a game this year and should have:
- Jones
- Simpson
- Buzza
- Krueger
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jones and buzza have no future. Simpson probably doesnt. Krueger got injured at the wrong time.Players who did not play a game this year and should have:
- Jones
- Simpson
- Buzza
- Krueger
Why would we park our full back in front of him rather then just putting him on him?Can’t disagree.
I saw Selwood took it upon himself to take the defensive side of the centre bounce. But he’s now too slow, despite his tremendous will.
And then Narkle went over or didn’t get his hands onto his opponent a few times in that third quarter.
6/6/6 and no runner really challenges teams.
That third quarter run-on for Richmond really was an example of this rule benefiting an attacking team. In the past we’d have parked Blicavs in front of Lynch after that first goal.
Charlie? should have read more closely my bad.Players who did not play a game this year and should have:
- Jones
- Simpson
- Buzza
- Krueger
The correct analogy is “now the shoe is being worn as a glove”...Correct now the shoe is on the other foot
That may work, but I was just commenting about how effective flooding your backline was prior to the 666 ruleWhy would we park or full back in front of him rather then just putting him on him?
Yet from where I sit I think Buckley can coach. Who else before he did it would have moved Moore to defence?IF you accept that every coach has "favourites" (which they do) then its hardly relevant to a discussion criticising a coach for having them.
I should say though that my experience was a long time ago...so maybe they don't any more.
You lose and the coach wears the brunt of the criticism, it goes with the turf....along with the "star" players....a visit to the Pie Board will find suggestions that Grundy was palming the ball to the opposition most of the time...wtf is he doing...., and Buckley is lacking the skills to be a Premiership coach.
Remarkable eh? Sounds like our Board.
His kicking is average at best so really playing him on the wing where you need elite ball use skills to have an impact is just ridiculous.Let me be criminal then,Blitz is a great athlete but lacks a football brain,give him simple strait forward jobs,maybe full back there's an idea.
Only krueger for me. And cunico on the wing if he wasn’t injured.Players who did not play a game this year and should have:
- Jones
- Simpson
- Buzza
- Krueger
Really Zach? What crime exactly has been committed?
I'll help you out. We have a different view than you, Scott, and the bulls**t that we're constantly fed.
Go ahead and prosecute. Try turning up when the pressure's on for once too.
His kicking is average at best so really playing him on the wing where you need elite ball use skills to have an impact is just ridiculous.
But I'm not criticising him for his games as a wingman because he's just doing what he's told.
He played FB for the first half of the year and was in AA contention; why would you change it and how can anybody possibly defend such a ludicrous decision.
His point is a valid one. There is clearly reasons for the Blicavs decision we are not aware meaning we can't make an informed opinion.
I would like the club to let us know what they are but seems they feel its intellectual property they want to keep internal.
Scott doesn't rate Charlie Cameron,Grundy or Lynch,that's all I've got.What was the logic behind the decision?
Jones and buzza have no future. Simpson probably doesnt. Krueger got injured at the wrong time.
I have no idea, so unless the club or coach comes out and states why they did it then for me personally I will always see it as one of the moves which cost us a GF spot.What was the logic behind the decision?
The etc is the issue.I don't think we have an etc.
Our top 4 or so are elite, but it drops off too severely.
Watching Collingwood, Taylor Adams and Sidebottom are superb mids, and run both ways, Pendlebury is better. Treloar is a gun. Greenwood was NM's second best mid when he left there, and plays as a run - with player. Stephenson could play as a mid, runs all day, and gets 20+ possessions as a small forward. De Goey could be a mid. They ARE laden with true talent.
Kelly is almost flakey, Selwood has carried us too long, Danger is exceptional. Duncan is well below the talent level of all those named, makes way too many "unforced errors" to be highly regarded. Guthrie is our best 2-way mid, even Roos said that last night, and he is not in that league of players mentioned.
We could do this comparison with GWS, Richmond, WCE
I think too many here look at us only, and think we have a great list, but in comparison, we don't.
The thing is, I don't expect us to, and am not critical of it- it is just what we have, and at Geelong, CS is able to get that list to perform. Away from there, for whatever reason, the deficiencies are magnified. I don't get angry at his efforts to get us up, or to trick the opposition, because he is painfully aware of where we are at, and there is not much that can be done to alter that consistently enough under pressure.
If a new coach was able to do so, then my theory is useless, but it's going to be a while before it is put to the test.
The added issue is the decline of Selwood, GAJ, Hawkins, and Taylor
Needs to drop his media commitments back to the minimum this coming year
Relax all, Scott quoted as saying, " l'm sure when we all look back we'll all come to the conclusion we've had a pretty good year."
So there you go the coach has spoken.
It's all good! Lol!
My biggest frustration with Scott & the coaches last night was playing Blicavs on the wing and seemingly not looking at trying something different on Lynch in the second half.
It's easy to blame Scott for not making the switch, but there's also Scarlett who is our defensive coach who may have had some say on the make up of our defensive unit. Did Scarlett not trust or want a switch of Henderson to the backline with Taylor going forward?
I would like to have seen a change made in regards to the Lynch matchup - but we lost the game through the middle, with Richmond running & working harder in the second half then we did
With Harry gone I get a sinking feeling when I imagine Blitz as the new Plan B.HT back will be missed. But at least it will force Scott to leave Blics back.
This secret squirrel crap that the coach and club constantly hides behind is really starting to grind my gears.
Sometimes, it's justified, but more often than not I think it's just a smug, defensive mechanism to dismiss and deflect scrutiny.
Good points.I don’t get all your love for Collingwood. They are on the same level as us. Pendles and Sidebottom are aging midfielders. Reid is also cooked.
You continue to say we aren’t that good and we don’t have the players. You even wanted to compare us with the “all mighty eagles” who we actually beat comfortably, in a final last week.
It seems you shield yourself from disappointment for the reason of not wanting to get burnt. I get that, I do, but a lot of what you said simply isn’t true.
We are absolutely capable. We showed that Friday night in a first half that was near perfect football.
When you continue to chop and change players when your finally starting to get a settled team is a recipe for disaster. I like Chris but he needs to take responsibility for that. We had hardly any injuries this year yet we had to bring back Bews. Why? And the most disappointing thing is it’s the same outcome every year.
Geelong remind me of a magician who’s really good but tries to do 1 trick to many and ends up completely stuffing up the trick. You didn’t need need to do that trick you were already doing enough.
Relax all, Scott quoted as saying, " l'm sure when we all look back we'll all come to the conclusion we've had a pretty good year."
So there you go the coach has spoken.
It's all good! Lol!