Cummins Overrated?

Remove this Banner Ad

People go on about Hazlewood being the next McGrath - i reckon it's Cummins

So consistent on a length on or about off stump.

No longer swings or jags it massively - just does enough to kiss the edge.

He may not get as many glory balls (such as a starc inswinger) - but he's damn effective.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What are Pat Cummins numbers in the 24 months since this thread was created ?
20 tests, 103 wickets, average of 20, SR 43.9, ER 2.75
 
Mate you go off topic in every single thread, reminiscing over great players that you watched in the '60s and '70s lmao.
ha ha. you got me confused with someone else. Drinking already ?
Not old enough to have seen any of 1960's...lol and first summer I watched any Test cricket was 1979 .. so I've virtually missed Test cricket of those decades. Try again...lol

BTW, Cummins is super. OP clueless....lol
 
ha ha. you got me confused with someone else. Drinking already ?
Not old enough to have seen any of 1960's...lol and first summer I watched any Test cricket was 1979 .. so I've virtually missed Test cricket of those decades. Try again...lol

BTW, Cummins is super. OP clueless....lol
Sounds like it was Adelaide Hawk.
 
Worst strike rate and average of all our bowlers so far this series. Has struggled to lead the attack this Test. At least he's been economical.

I mean, I rate him, but he doesn't get nearly as much stick as someone like Starc - which seems odd given their respective returns.

Bet you feel like a real tool right now hey
 
People go on about Hazlewood being the next McGrath - i reckon it's Cummins

So consistent on a length on or about off stump.

No longer swings or jags it massively - just does enough to kiss the edge.

He may not get as many glory balls (such as a starc inswinger) - but he's damn effective.

Hazlewood is superficially the most similar to McGrath, but he lacks McGrath's bag of tricks. Hence why he doesn't average below 25 like I would have hoped after his debut 5-fer.

Closer to Reiffel than McGrath IMO (though still better).

As for Cummins - yes, this is the thread that keeps on giving. I guess we all do and say things that turn out to be unwise with hindsight...:)
 
I remember seeing Steve Smith bat for first time & thought his technique would never work at test level.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

People go on about Hazlewood being the next McGrath - i reckon it's Cummins

So consistent on a length on or about off stump.

No longer swings or jags it massively - just does enough to kiss the edge.

He may not get as many glory balls (such as a starc inswinger) - but he's damn effective.

Me and a mate had a similar discussion yesterday - he’s got the accuracy and bounce of McGrath; with another 10-15km of Pace.
 
Me and a mate had a similar discussion yesterday - he’s got the accuracy and bounce of McGrath; with another 10-15km of Pace.

Ooh ah was pretty quick in the 90s - certainly into the low 140s

He never got to the 150 mark that Cummins has hit.

But i don't reckon the gap is near 15kmh at the same age.

McGrath massively slowed down once he hit 30
 
It's been so good to watch Cummins realise his potential in the last 2 years. Especially happy I got to see him in the flesh take 5 at the MCG recently. Those spells he bowled that day eclipsed Rabada at Hobart as the best bowling I've ever seen live.

Can't help but feel he has gone to another level since the Ashes. Even though he hasn't necessarily torn lineups apart this summer, it now seems like he is in complete control whereas last summer he was still learning how to fully harness his talent and ability. Also helping I think is his status as our best bowler, rather than the bang-it-in brutaliser role he was assigned earlier.

The one thing now that I'm hoping to see from him is an innings where he single-handedly decimates a line-up and picks up 7 or 8 wickets. McGrath had that 8 for at Lords in 1997 which really announced him as a master quick. To a lesser extent Johnson's 8 in Perth in 2008 was a signal that he'd become what Lillee predicted (and what a shame he couldn't consistently hit that level bar 13/14). Will be tougher for Cummins with the attack he is sharing wickets with, and also that Australian wickets seldom allow for that kind of scything bowling performance these days.
 
Gough you're probably the best person to ask here. Is this the most ill informed thread ever seen on these boards? Lol
 
Bet you feel like a real tool right now hey
Nope.

The point I was making (admittedly with a pretty clickbaity title) was that, at the time the thread was made, Cummins was receiving fairly disproportionate praise and comparatively little criticism compared to bowlers who were regularly turning in far superior performances - Starc in particular. It is a common problem on this forum, where Test bowlers get way too much credit for economy and not nearly enough for strike rate.

As I noted in the OP you quoted, I still rated Cummins and I am glad that he has gone on to fulfil his potential.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top