- May 3, 2015
- 3,010
- 6,857
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Cubs Blackhawks Fulham Ivanhoe FC
You just love that Trubisky shirt aye
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You just love that Trubisky shirt aye
You just love that Trubisky shirt aye
Dave Astbury dual premiership player.What a spud.
Dave Astbury dual premiership player.
Mind your manners.
Needs to be traded to the Leeds 49ersSpudisky. $29m over 4 years. Guaranteed ! Hah hah hah...
my final 22 would be
b Astbury Grimes Balta
Houli Vlaustin Short
Kmc Edwards Prestia
Lambert Lynch Caddy
Aarts Riewoldt Castagna
foll Nank Martin Cotchin
i Baker Graham Pickett Rioli
Emerg (Bolton Chol)
I know it's a difficult decision.
But Edwards and Bolton play similar roles.
I wrote about it earlier.
They are not easy decisions for our match committee to assess.
If there is an injury, Bolton returns.
Youād seriously leave Bolton out?ā!
WTF !! Why ? How?!
hate to agree with that but I do.I don't see dimma dropping George for a final.
Too brave. Hard. Tough. Fast etc.
Dude, Bolton is in our best 5 or 6 players right now. He will walk back in.The elite teams introduce one or two new players each year.
I would retain Aarts and Balta.
Lynch and Prestia would return.
Chol and Ross out.
They have to consider whether or not Bolton returns, that is the key issue.
If Prestia has a complication, then Bolton returns regardless.
I know it would be a difficult decision to make.
End of the day, Edwards plays that type of Bolton role through the centre.
The problem is Chol isn't a ruck mans arse hole, he is absolutely rubbish as a ruckman. If he can't play forward and can't play ruck what can he do? I would prefer to play Broad in the ruck at lest he leaves everything out on the footy ground. Seriously Broady would have been a better forward than Chol. The problem with Chol is he always looks for the cheap out the back possession. He cannot be considered for the finals series, he showed all his cards last night and they were bad. If I was Dimma I would be fuming with what he dished up last night. FFS even Markov playing forward would have been 1000% better he is the player that should be playing instead of Chol. If Chol could ruck I would swallow my pride and admit he is needed but he doesn't even offer that. This isn't a personal attack on Chol because I like him but it's plain for everyone to see that he can't handle the pressure.
The bloke who's going to win our b&f as an emergency. Wow. Welcome to depth Tigerland lolmy final 22 would be
b Astbury Grimes Balta
Houli Vlaustin Short
Kmc Edwards Prestia
Lambert Lynch Caddy
Aarts Riewoldt Castagna
foll Nank Martin Cotchin
i Baker Graham Pickett Rioli
Emerg (Bolton Chol)
my final 22 would be
b Astbury Grimes Balta
Houli Vlaustin Short
Kmc Edwards Prestia
Lambert Lynch Caddy
Aarts Riewoldt Castagna
foll Nank Martin Cotchin
i Baker Graham Pickett Rioli
Emerg (Bolton Chol)
I doubt Caddy will be considered as a pinch hit ruckman given what had happened to his knee against Adelaide. It was innocuous so jumping in the ruck is surely not an option.I think Nank can shoulder the ruck and Caddy can play the 3rd tall/pinch hit. We did it with Grigg, we can do it again and yet this time around we have Lynch.
With a spot in our side up for grabs for Chol, that performance was so disappointing and against the worst side this year.
Positions for spots is so hard and there will be some very unlucky boys, so to dish up that is not good enough. Who knows he may have been a bit off or had something going on.
Will be interesting to see how Dimma sees it
Pleased that Bolton was in great form.
End of the day though, he was playing the Edwards role in his absence.
Bolton was slotted in the Edwards role from round five onwards, the Melbourne game on July 5. The Prestia injury game.
I would only make two changes.
Lynch-Chol and Prestia-Ross.
Each to their own.
Our match committee will be looking at the various scenarios.
It's not an easy task for sure.