milk the Brisbane and Melbourne teams
How did that go?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
milk the Brisbane and Melbourne teams
Will an existing team go to make way for Brisbane 2?
what impact might this have on the Lions' ability to get fans?
One of the AFLs present strengths in northern states outreach is primary school engagement,
if the NRL gets their act together on this it could eat into Australian rules participation.
The second quote looks like it’s straight from the trump book of speeches...NRL bombshell: Second team in Brisbane on cards for 2023
Peter V’landys has declared “It’s very realistic to say that we’ll have a second team in Brisbane in 2023”.www.smh.com.au
Couple of interesting quotes:
We've known for a while that V’landys has been targeting expansion in Brisbane in the near future, this puts a concrete date on it. Will an existing team go to make way for Brisbane 2? And what impact might this have on the Lions' ability to get fans?
What's new is his focus on participation at primary school level, and specifically linking the new team to having the goal of increasing participation (in Brisbane, presumably). One of the AFLs present strengths in northern states outreach is primary school engagement, if the NRL gets their act together on this it could eat into Australian rules participation.
That would be the sensible procedure.
The Lions ability to get fans has been clearly shown to be linked to their onfield performance.
Same with GWS, despite being surrounded by NRL clubs.
The Force, Rebels, Storm have not impacted the AFL in any way.
But the AFL don't expect female primary school teachers to become coaches and push the code.
Gee, that sounds like AFL is the leading football participation sport in Qld.
Gws crowds in Sydney higher in seasons before making gf.
Why would primary school teachers want to be trained to be RL coaches on top of all their usual responsibilities?
Wouldn't it make more sense to come in with pre trained coaches?
Dunno, maybe they could get an allowance of a few grand a year from the NRL or something like that? But I guess that would require some investment from them to do that.
I think it's part of the rugby league mentality - rugby league is the dominant professional sport in NSW so NSW is a rugby league state so everybody is enamoured with rugby league and will gladly assist in any way.
Well AFL is an AFL state and it's hard just to keep primary schools playing Australian Football (and other potentially dangerous sports) like they used to.
Teachers have a mind of their own starting with primary school teachers.
They are always complaining about something and I don't see them doing that will increase their workload.
Which I guess is part of their problem as the game simply doesn't appear to have the *playing* culture in their heartland. That's a very hard thing to fix, because my experience is that kids want to play with their mates, and if none of their school friends are playing it can be a hard sell.
Which is why you'd need to offer the cash incentive. But a few grand a year can get expensive if you have a thousand people on it.
I know that when AFL brought in Auskick that was a quantum leap in providing an alternative to soccer in the early years.
Then modified football with the graduated increase in physicality, appeased the blessed-little-mothers worries about little Tommy.
Rugby league is the dominant professional sport in NSW but soccer is clearly the dominant participation sport in NSW.
When the ABS last did a census and not just a survey the results were staggering with rugby league participation only a fraction of
soccer participation and not that far in front of rugby union and Australian Football participation.
NRL was worried about AFL back then but it was more a case of soccer overshadowing contacts sports.
I'm not sure how that would work.
I know that when AFL brought in Auskick that was a quantum leap in providing an alternative to soccer in the early years.
Then modified football with the graduated increase in physicality, appeased the blessed-little-mothers worries about little Tommy.
With rugby league it's more difficult - basically tackle or no tackle with tackling being what rugby league is about.
With the introduction of AFLW, there is added pressure to cater for a sport that both genders can play at junior level.
Ha - you can't take contact out of afl. You can with rugby's it's called touch!!
Ha - you can't take contact out of afl.
You can with rugby's it's called touch!!
What a totally idiotic and meaningless statement (rant ?).
Australian Football now starts with Auskick (Freeball) which is only catch, kick and maybe a little handball.
Then, modified football progresses through a range of contact - incidental, bump and finally tackle.
Rugby is all about tackling. If you remove the tackling - then there is no rugby.
Touch football is simply a game of keepings off. If it wasn't for the "heel" then there would be no "football".
There is no rugby in touch football. There is only passing.
The thing is, you cannot put the contact into soccer. Boring, boring, boring - a complete lack of options.
Maybe you should look at Gaelic Football which makes soccer look interesting.
Contact sports can take the contact out but soccer cannot put any in.
Touch is a game, it is just a different game.Do you believe what you say?? Touch isn't a game?? Tell the ppl who belong to leagues & others who represent Australia at world championships... & every kid who play as part of PE.
I play a union style touch game with no play the ball every week.
Meanwhile, pretty sure there are no afl touch league
Do you believe what you say?? Touch isn't a game??
Meanwhile, pretty sure there are no afl touch league
Well it could get more competitive no doubt but longer term is the big question. It may test our strength up there if they get into the schools.NRL bombshell: Second team in Brisbane on cards for 2023
Peter V’landys has declared “It’s very realistic to say that we’ll have a second team in Brisbane in 2023”.www.smh.com.au
Couple of interesting quotes:
We've known for a while that V’landys has been targeting expansion in Brisbane in the near future, this puts a concrete date on it. Will an existing team go to make way for Brisbane 2? And what impact might this have on the Lions' ability to get fans?
What's new is his focus on participation at primary school level, and specifically linking the new team to having the goal of increasing participation (in Brisbane, presumably). One of the AFLs present strengths in northern states outreach is primary school engagement, if the NRL gets their act together on this it could eat into Australian rules participation.
Likely will decrease the AFL male rate further.
Will add a bit more to my post.Further ? It's on the up.
Under estimate Peter V'landys at your peril.The second quote looks like it’s straight from the trump book of speeches...
Why's that? The man is a carnival barker, a glorified PR agent.Under estimate Peter V'landys at your peril.
AFL house don't that's for sure.
The QLD male rate at 53% currently is low by any other State.
QLD male figure will continue to drop over time relative to the females.
Why's that? The man is a carnival barker, a glorified PR agent.