Sloane's tackle on Blicavs

Remove this Banner Ad

This footage? Looks round at Harry Taylor, not once but twice before dropping his knees.

giphy.gif
LOL. Would you care to watch an hour long video of Selwood ducking and dropping at the knees ??
 
LOL. Would you care to watch an hour long video of Selwood ducking and dropping at the knees ??

Sheer deflection. This is Sloane ducking into a tackle causing head high contact in the same week as he had prolonged media attention about his concussion. And the umpires gave him a free kick for it.
 
Just because someone is injured, doesn't mean someone needs to be suspended.

The delusion in this thread is embarrassing.

Blicavs shepherded, Sloane wasn't expecting it, grabbed onto Blicavs as a natural reaction to break his fall, and unfortunately landed awkwardly on his leg. No malice, nothing worth a freakin' 5 page thread about ffs
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Just because someone is injured, doesn't mean someone needs to be suspended.

The delusion in this thread is embarrassing.

Blicavs shepherded, Sloane wasn't expecting it, grabbed onto Blicavs as a natural reaction to break his fall, and unfortunately landed awkwardly on his leg. No malice, nothing worth a freakin' 5 page thread about ffs
agreed, this and the eye-gouging thread are embarrassing
 
Just because someone is injured, doesn't mean someone needs to be suspended.

The delusion in this thread is embarrassing.

Blicavs shepherded, Sloane wasn't expecting it, grabbed onto Blicavs as a natural reaction to break his fall, and unfortunately landed awkwardly on his leg. No malice, nothing worth a freakin' 5 page thread about ffs

That is correct but it would be nice to know that they at least had a cursory look at it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Just because someone is injured, doesn't mean someone needs to be suspended.

The delusion in this thread is embarrassing.

Blicavs shepherded, Sloane wasn't expecting it, grabbed onto Blicavs as a natural reaction to break his fall, and unfortunately landed awkwardly on his leg. No malice, nothing worth a freakin' 5 page thread about ffs
Since when is intention relevant? It's all outcome based isn't it?
 
Since when is intention relevant? It's all outcome based isn't it?

Geez talk about a delayed response.

If it was all outcome based, then every injury would result in a suspension. Stupid. There needs to be an act which gives rise to consideration first. It did not exist here.
 
Geez talk about a delayed response.

If it was all outcome based, then every injury would result in a suspension. Stupid. There needs to be an act which gives rise to consideration first. It did not exist here.
Guess you didn't detect the sarcasm in my comment. Pity I have to point it out
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top